AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01088
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect he remained on active duty
orders for the period 30 Jun 10 through 20 Mar 11.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was injured during his deployment to Iraq and was removed from
orders before his medical issue was resolved.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of AFRC
Form 348, Informal Line of Duty Determination, AF Form 469, Duty
Limiting Condition Report, AF Form 938, Request for Authorization
for Active Duty Training/Active Duty Tour, AF Form 22,
Qualification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status.
The application’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force Reserve.
On 5 Jan 10, the applicant commenced a tour of active duty of 169
days in support of Operation IRAQI FREEDOM. His initial orders
were extended and he was released from active duty on 29 Jun 10.
On 10 Ju1 10, two Informal Line of Duty Determinations (LOD) were
initiated for injuries the applicant sustained to his back while
deployed to Iraq. Both ILODs concurred the injury was in the
LOD. On 3 Sep 10 and 9 Sep 10, respectively, the appointing
authority found the applicant’s injuries to be in the LOD.
On 21 Mar 11, the applicant commenced a tour of voluntary active
duty of 35 days for a surgical procedure and hospitalization
related to his LOD injuries. His orders were subsequently
extended several times until he was finally released from active
duty on 24 Feb 12 when he was cleared to return to duty.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibits C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFMOA/SGHI recommends denial noting the applicant did not meet
MEDCON eligibility requirements until the date of his surgery.
No determination of eligibility can be made prior to the date of
the Command Man-Day Allocation System (CMAS) request, as no
documentation was ever provided. The applicant’s DLC and LOD
were initiated after his orders ended. The CMAS request was
submitted on 28 Dec 12; however, after multiple declinations at
AFRC, MEDCON and A1MO his case was allocated on 11 Mar 11 with a
start date of 21 Mar 11.
The CMAS indicates the initial diagnostics were returned normal;
however, additional tests were ordered, but there is no record of
completion or results being provided. At time of allocation it
was determined conservative treatment failed and surgical
intervention was required.
Per SAF/MR Memo, 9 Dec 11, section "b. Medical Continuation,
Eligibility for Medical continuation, the ARC member will be
eligible for Medical Continuation orders when an injury, illness,
or disease is incurred or aggravated while serving on active duty
and that condition renders the member unable to perform military
duties." It further states in this same section, "Not all
conditions that restrict deployment or mobility constitute
eligibility for medical continuation."
Once the Air Reserve Component (ARC) service members are
demobilized they are eligible for the Transition Assistance
Management Program (TAMP), a 180-day period of health benefits,
beginning on the sponsor's separation. Once the LOD's were
completed, service member was eligible for care for those two
conditions through Military Medical Support Office (MMSO).
Eligibility is based on the completed service approved LOD
injury, illness or disease. Incapacitation pay is a third venue
the applicant could have been eligible for. Service members are
eligible for this benefit if they are able to perform their
military duties but unable to perform their civilian duties.
The AFMOA/SGHI complete evaluation, with attachments, is at
Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
2
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 8 May 12, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
While the evidence of record indicates the applicant was placed
on active duty for the purpose of medical treatment and
recuperation, there is no evidence that said injury rendered him
unfit for the duties of his office and/or grade during the
requested period or caused the applicant any loss of earnings
during this period as he contends. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-01088 in Executive Session on 13 Dec 12, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
3
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Mar 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Military Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFMOA/SGHI, dated 4 May 12, w/atch
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 May 12.
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-01088 was considered:
Panel Chair
4
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00637
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00637 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to Medical Continuation (MEDCON) orders starting on 20 Sep 12 vice 10 Oct 12, based on his injury he sustained In the Line of Duty (INLOD). ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00805
However, the MEDCON orders were not completed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/SGPF recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00118
The Medical Consultant states that the applicant may be eligible for at least periodic restoration of active duty orders to receive treatment for his medical condition on the dates he was required to take leave from his civilian employment, but finds the evidence insufficient to establish MEDCON orders along the entire continuum requested; noting the evidence suggesting that his medical condition waxed and waned while under treatment with epidural and sacroiliac steroid injections; allowing...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03402
On 7 Dec 10, the LOD Board administrator signed, for the Air Force Reserve Vice Commander, deciding that the applicants injury was In the Line of Duty (INLOD). He has AF Forms 422s and 469s that reflect his duty limitations and currently/supposedly going through a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) process. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04716
From 1 Mar 10 to 6 Oct 11, he should have been on medical continuation (MEDCON) orders for his injuries. Per SAF/AA Memo, Return to Active Duty of Air Force Reserve Component Members Unable to Perform Military Duties, dated 8 Dec 06, Entitlement under this policy shall begin when the condition renders the Airman unable to perform military duties, not when the injury occurred or when the Airman was released from active duty. In this instance, the surgical date would be considered the date...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03639
There is no evidence of a Command Man-Day Allocation System (CMAS) request for MEDCON during any time the applicant was on AD orders or prior to his retirement date of 1 Jun 12. While we note the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility to deny the applicants request, the evidence reflects the applicant was treated for a medical condition in Dec 11 and, contrary to the AF Form 348, Informal Line of Duty Determination, dated Mar 12, wherein the military medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01021
His orders should have continued for medical treatment of the injuries he incurred during his TDY to Korea. In support of his request the applicant provides copies of VA Form 10-5345, Request for and Authorization to Release Medical Records or Health Information; and AF Forms 938, Request and Authorization for Active Duty Training/Active Duty Tour. SGHI states there were no notes provided to show that the applicant followed up with his Primary Care Manager (PCM) or what the prescribed...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00996
MEDCON managed by SGHI and through CMAS does not provide orders for ADOS tours. The complete SGHI evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 Aug 13 for review and comment within 30 days. Exhibit C. Letter, AFMOA/SGHI, dated 8 Jul 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04977
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04977 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect she was not released from active duty on 2 Sep 11, but was instead retained on active duty for medical continuation (MEDCON) until 16 Nov 11. Severalattempts were made to secure MEDCON orders with no responses...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03992
In this respect, we note the applicant was on active duty orders in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM and was diagnosed with a medical injury. While the applicant requests continuation of his active duty orders for the period 18 Jun 11 to 9 Sep 11, we concur with the recommendation of AFMOA/SGHI to correct the record to reflect the applicant was retained on active duty orders for the period 19 Jun 11 to 27 Jul 11. ________________________________________________________________ THE...