Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01068
Original file (BC-2012-01068.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01068 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF:   
 
 
     
 
     
 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:  
 
He be promoted to the grade/rank of technical sergeant (E6) with 
a date of rank (DOR) of 1 February 1967.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He  was  relieved  from  active  duty  and  placed  on  the  Temporary 
Disability Retired List (TDRL) on 31 October 1966.  He believes 
that  if  he  had  been  considered  for  promotion  to  technical 
sergeant he would have been selected for promotion.  He is not 
sure he was considered for promotion. 
 
The  purpose  of  his  application  is  to  confirm  that  he  was 
considered and selected for promotion to the grade of technical 
sergeant with a DOR of 1 February 1967. 
 
In  support  of  his  request,  the  applicant  provides  a  personal 
statement, a copy of his retirement order and his DD Form 214, 
Armed  Forces  of  the  United  States  Report  of  Transfer  or 
Discharge.   
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  enlisted  in  the  Regular  Air  Force  on  17  April 
1954.    He  was  progressively  promoted  to  the  grade  of  staff 
sergeant  with  a  date  of  rank  of  1  June  1961.    On  30  September 
1966, he was placed on the TDRL.  He was later found unqualified 
for  the  performance  of  military  duties  and  placed  on  the 
Permanent  Disability  Retired  List  at  the  grade  of  staff 
sergeant, effective 4 June 1968.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSOE  recommends  the  application  be  time  barred.  
Promotions  during  that  time  were  made  at  the  Major  Command 
unless  delegated  to  the  Wing,  Group  or  Squadron  level.  
Promotion  boards  selected  individuals  based  on  the  quotas 
received by HQ USAF within each career field.  To be considered 
for promotion to E6, an individual must have 21 months time-in-
grade,  possess  a  7-skill  level  and  be  recommended  by  the 
commander.    These  were  the  minimum  requirements  and  did  not 
guarantee promotion. 
 
The  promotion  regulation  at  that  (AFR  39-29,  Promotion  of 
Airmen)  stated  that  airmen  found  to  be  unfit  for  further 
military  service  by  the  Secretary  of  the  Air  Force  and  being 
separated or retired for physical disability were ineligible for 
promotion.    A  review  of  the  applicant’s  records  reveals  no 
official  documents  or  orders  promoting  him  to  the  rank  of 
technical sergeant prior to his placement on the TDRL. 
 
The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant on 24 May 2012, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit  D).    As  of  this  date,  this  office  has  received  no 
response. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  an  error  or  injustice.    The 
applicant’s complete submission was thoroughly reviewed and his 
contentions  duly  noted.    However,  we  note  the  applicant  was 
placed  on  the  Temporary  Disability  Retired  List  (TDRL)  in  the 
grade of staff sergeant.  As such, upon placement on the TDRL, 
in accordance with the policy contained in AFR 39-29,  Promotion 
of Airmen, Table 1, he was not eligible for promotion and would 
not have been considered for promotion to the grade of technical 
sergeant.  We are not persuaded that the record raises issues of 
error  or  injustice  which  require  resolution  on  the  merits.  
Therefore,  in  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find 

 

 
2

no  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this 
application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-01068 in Executive Session on 31 July 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 22 Feb 12, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 9 May 12. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 May 12. 
 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   Panel Chair 
 
 

  Panel Chair 
  Member 
  Member 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 

 
3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03741

    Original file (BC 2013 03741.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Prior to the amendment to the law, members were retired in the grade they held on their date of separation. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01708

    Original file (BC 2014 01708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01708 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His rank listed on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued 3 Dec 07, in Block 4a/b, Grade, Rate or Rank/Pay Grade, be changed to Staff Sergeant (SSgt/E-5). His untimely application should be considered in the interest of justice because he received a form from the Physical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00583

    Original file (BC-2011-00583.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00583 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect she was retired in the grade of technical sergeant (TSgt), rather than staff sergeant (SSgt). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03835

    Original file (BC-2012-03835.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant failed to complete the required mandatory PME or receive an approved waiver prior to his 28 Jul 12 retirement. Airmen with approved waivers must attend PME, in the higher grade, within 179 days of their effective promotion date, or as soon as they are available without impacting the mission. The DD Form 214 will reflect the active duty grade the member held at time of separation/retirement and the retirement order will reflect the rank as "highest grade held on active...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200856

    Original file (0200856.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ineligibility occurs on the date of the Secretarial determination and is effective that date, irrespective of the fact that a member may be on an announced promotion selection list awaiting promotion, or that the member may actually retire or separate for physical disability on a date subsequent to the determination. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his records should be changed to reflect that he had been promoted to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00588

    Original file (BC-2012-00588.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    To be considered for promotion to E-5 an individual must have had a minimum of 18 months time-in-grade (TIG), a skill level commensurate with their Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC), and be recommended by the commander. To be considered for promotion to TSgt, an individual must have 18 months TIG as a SSgt, possess a 7-skill level, have a current PFE and SKT score, and be recommended by the promotion authority. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03355

    Original file (BC-2007-03355.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the applicant’s DOR as a SrA of 13 June 1992, the first time he was considered for promotion to the grade of SSgt was cycle 94A5. The AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In an undated letter, the applicant reiterated his contention that based on Air Force Pamphlet 36-2241, paragraph 15.41.2.SrA, which states that A1Cs are promoted to SrA with either 36 months TIS and 20...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00762

    Original file (BC-2011-00762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00762 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His grade of staff sergeant (SSgt/E-5) be reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) on 24 Jan 11. ACD- 00199, issued...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03818

    Original file (BC-2012-03818.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03818 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be promoted to the grade of staff sergeant (SSgt) with an original date of rank (DOR) and effective date of 1 July 2010. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1998-01992

    Original file (BC-1998-01992.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01992 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement grade be changed to technical sergeant (TSgt). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, Enlisted Promotion & Mil Testing Branch, AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed the...