AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00745
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/STORM while serving in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served on active duty from 6 January 1987 to 4 February 1991. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00749
By letter dated 19 March 2012, HQ AFPC/DPSIM requested the applicant provide additional supporting documentation to substantiate his claim; specifically, a signed memorandum from the Fit Cell staff documenting that his pushups were counted incorrectly. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provided an expanded statement of the events of 6 December 2011 and provided supporting documents. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00759
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends the original “Given Under My Hand” date of 10 Aug 10, be used in reference to supplemental promotion board consideration and that the memorandum stating the AFCM 3OLC is missing from the applicant’s record be removed from the personnel file. DPSOO notes the AFCM (4OLC) was amended to reflect AFCM (3OLC); however, the incorrect AFCM (4OLC) citation had a “Given Under My Hand” date...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00761
The member’s ADSC waiver request is not in the best interest of the Air Force. It is in the best interest of the Air Force and his daughter to approve his request, which will allow him to retire upon completion of 20 years of service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00765
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had a known injury documented by a flight surgeon on a Memorandum for Fitness Assessment Cell, dated 27 September 2011, and a medical evaluation recommending postponing the fitness assessment through 13 October 2011. They recommend denial of his request to have the fitness assessment dated 12 October 2011, removed from AFFMS. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00775
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00775 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The term “Violation of Article 93,” in section 14, paragraph 2, of his AF Form 3070A, Record of Nonjudicial Punishment Proceedings (AB –TSgt), dated 17 April 2009 be completely eliminated. The commander then imposed the punishment for the two...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00784
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for AFBCMR BC-2012-00784 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 3 December 2009, for a period of six (6) years, with a $15,000.00 bonus entitlement based upon Air Force Reserve guidance and policy. The pertinent military...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00786
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In 2009, he registered for Post 9/11 GI Bill education benefits with the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) and was led to believe that his Defense Enrollment Eligibility System (DEERS) dependents would be automatically eligible to receive the education benefits. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00788
By letter dated 21 March 2012, AFPC/DPSIM requested the applicant provide additional supporting documentation to substantiate his claim; specifically, copies of his AF Forms 469 and 422 indicating his limitations/type of blood pressure medication. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 4 June 2012 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). After...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00789
The SOU clearly states the member would incur a service obligation period of four years and the ADSC will be updated in the member’s record effective from the date of application in the DMDC TEB website. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission to include his rebuttal statement in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00793
After a review of the applicant’s records and medical notes, SGPS found she checked “No”, on the history of asthma, shortness of breath, wheezing, airmen are Further, and use of an inhaler; however, she admitted to having asthma symptoms and was treated with inhalers. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00795
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for AFBCMR BC-2012-00795 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to be corrected to show the cardio component portion of the fitness assessment, dated 25 October 2011, be and hereby is, amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00798
DPSIAR states the applicant was properly briefed on the options and effects of the SBP by the Dyess Air Force Base SBP counselor prior to retirement, including the disenrollment provision. There is no provision in the law that allows the one-year disenrollment period to be extended or suspended because a member is recalled to active duty. His wife’s notarized signature on the DD Form 2656-2 is included with his rebuttal.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00800
The Public Law states in part, that “an individual may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the Armed Forces when the transfer is executed.” Articles were published that explained the program benefits and requirements. The applicant initially applied for TEB on 3 Sep; however, the member was informed that he needed to extend his enlistment in order to be eligible for TEB. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00802
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00802 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. After careful consideration of the applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we find no evidence which indicates that the applicant’s service...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00807
2 The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C through E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPF recommends an SSB be convened and the applicant’s record be competed for an in-residence seat against officers actually selected for ISS during his eligibility window. The complete DPSID evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00810
He accomplished a thorough review of his records prior to the O- 5 promotion board and the DG information was not in his records. DPSID states the applicant’s contested training report (TR) was signed by the evaluator on 5 January 2000 and has been a matter of record in the Automated Records Management System (ARMS) and the Officer Selection Record (OSR) since its filing date which was prior to the convening date of the applicable Central Selection Board (CSB) the applicant is contesting. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00811
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The member did not provide the requested documentation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00816
Members who are retired on or after 23 September 1996 may be retired in the regular or reserve grade to which they had been selected and would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which they were retired. The DD Form 214 reflects the active duty grade the member held at the time of separation. ________________________________________________________________ 2 Panel Chair Member Member The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00820
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction BCMR BC-2012-00820 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: corrected to show that he was discharged with severance pay in the grade of Technical Sergeant (E- 6) effective 14 September 2011. The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to XXX, be Director Air Force Review...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00821
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00821 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “4C” (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00827
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his EPRs for periods ending 4 Apr 08 and 13 Jan 09, his appeal to the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) and, a memorandum from his rater dated 6 May 08. Moreover, while Air Force policy requires formal feedback be documented, a direct correlation between information provided during the feedback session and the assessments on an evaluation report does not necessarily exist. The complete AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00829
On 29 October 2008, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to discharge him from the Air Force for Misconduct, a pattern of misconduct, conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. On 5 April 2011, the Air Force Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his discharge. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00835
On 31 May 11, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation Of Airmen, with a narrative reason of completion of required active service, a corresponding SPD code of JBK, and an RE code of 2X. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, stating, in part, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the narrative...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00836
In an e- mail he received it stated, “Due to the ambiguity of initial guidance surrounding the Post 911 GI Bill and the Transferability Benefit option, we are offering you the opportunity to request a 1-month extension of your retirement date to retire effective 1 Sep 09 to become eligible for the Post 911 Transferability Benefit Option.” He submitted a request for an extension, but received an e-mail from the Colonel’s Group stating that his application was not approved because he applied...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00837
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 May 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00845
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00845 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to recommend granting the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00852
Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. Additionally, due to the lack of evidence of a successful post-service adjustment, we do not find it would be in the interest of justice to upgrade his discharge on the basis of clemency. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00854
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS c. Three Letter of Debt Complaints/Dishonored Check DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00854 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00868
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00868 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The AF Form 2098, Duty Status Change, dated 24 Jul 90, be declared void and removed from his records. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we do not find the applicant’s arguments or the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00871
The FPEB concluded the applicant was unfit for duty and recommended discharge with severance pay and a 10 percent disability rating. The applicant requests a change in his medical records to show that he was evaluated and rated for an eye condition, and injuries to his neck, back, shoulder, left hand, hips and legs. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00873
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00873 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. It also reflects N/A in Block 27, Wounds Received as a Result of Action with Enemy Forces. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00875
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIMC recommends denial of the applicants request to remove the LOR from her records. DPSOO states that the applicant was considered by the CY2011B (30 June 2011) and CY2012B (30 June 2012) Captains Promotion Process with a DNP recommendation. The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00880
Her OSA was found not in the line of duty by reason of Existed Prior to Service (EPTS) – LOD not applicable. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/SG recommends denial, noting that while her diagnosis corresponds to a period of active duty, absent a mid-face tumor or trauma, OSA has an incubation period of months to years. She notes she mistakenly did not provide all the active duty orders she had been on between the Jan 07 and Nov 09...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00884
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00884 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. On 12 Dec 89, the applicant’s commander notified her he was recommending her discharge from the Air Force for minor disciplinary infractions. The Board took note of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00891
On 14 Jan 87, he failed to comply with dormitory standards, for which he was furnished a Letter of Reprimand (LOR). On 26 Feb 88, he failed to go to a scheduled social 2 On 6 Apr 88, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for Misconduct—Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions, and was credited with 2 years, 10 months, and 22 days of active service. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00902
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00902 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he was retired for physical disability due to his post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The applicant continued his service in the Air Force Reserve as a dentist assigned to an Air Force Reserve unit until...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00906
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. However, we believe the documentation she provided in the form of an AF IMT 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status dated 1 November 2011, as well as the medical provider’s assessment, on the AF Form 108, dated 22 December 2011, provides a reasonable basis to conclude there were medical conditions which precluded the applicant from achieving a passing...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00907
In support of his request, the applicant provides letters of support from his commander, flight commander, an excerpt from the Fitness Program instruction, his Air Force Fitness Management print out, AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status and AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Report. 2 Panel Chair Member Member THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the fitness...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00913
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Post 9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) was not conveyed in a timely manner before his retirement date. However, based on the applicant's complete submission and his available military records, we find no evidence of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00914
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00914 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Remove her non-selections for promotion to the grade of major (0- 4) from her records. The applicant’s Officer Selection Brief (OSB), dated 25 Jan 11, reflects no errors. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 May 12.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00922
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS the provisions of AFI AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00922 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2C, which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service," be changed to allow reentry in the military. On 12 Aug 2011, he...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00923
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00923 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a RE code 1 series that would allow him to reenlist. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00934
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00934 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2B” (Involuntarily separated with a general or under other than honorable conditions discharge) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00935
He received a letter of counseling (LOC) and a letter of reprimand (LOR) for financial irresponsibility despite having provided letters stating he was unaware of his spouse’s actions. The applicant did not file an appeal through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00938
The Air Force should have made the decision of changing this policy to be effective for future recruiting goals in the recruiting career field and provided a definitive date of implementation rather than affecting personnel currently serving in that duty. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and do not find that it supports a determination that he be awarded two WAPS points for his Air Force Recruiting ribbon. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00946
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his Individual Fitness Assessment History, and a letter from his detachment chief. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that his fitness assessment dated 4 May 2011 be declared void and removed from the AFFMS. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Sep 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00950
Panel Chair The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air AFBCMR BC-2012-00950 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00954
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) to provide the applicant SSB consideration, during which he will be provided an opportunity to write a letter to the board explaining why he had been unable to complete ACSC prior to the board. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00955 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The characterization of his discharge be changed from general (under honorable conditions) to honorable. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report which is at...