AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02217
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 6 Aug 70, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Air Force at the completion of his required active service. The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02267
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02267 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal with four Bronze Service Stars (ICM w/4 BSS) rather than the ICM with two Bronze Service Stars (ICM w/2 BSS); and to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02268
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02275
He faxed his election not to participate in the SBP four times and the Defense Finance Accounting Service (DFAS) enrolled them in SBP against their will. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR recommends denial. The complete AFPC/DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02280
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Airmen are given entry-level separation with uncharacterized service when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of an error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02285
If those service members had sought clarification from an educational counselor, read the DOD or Air Force guidance that was very clear on that point, or taken other measures to make a timely decision before their separation or retirement, they could have initiated a timely transfer of benefits. The complete HQ USAF/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02289
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02289 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The evidence submitted in support of the appeal is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02292
DPSI notes the Board could find there was an injustice if the service members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DOD and Air Force guidance due to their terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early, as 1 Aug 09 and there would be no need to place the service member on active duty since the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) system...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02352
Her “Net Active Service” and “Total Active Federal Service,” as reflected on her DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty , be changed. The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02418
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS We find no evidence which indicates the applicant’s service characterization, which had its basis in his court-martial conviction and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded the limitations set forth in the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Dec 10.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02438
He receive service credit for the period following his medical retirement to the date of his return to active duty. The evidence of record indicates that he was medically qualified for continued active service at the time he was processed for an MEB. Had he known of the errors and injustices at the time of the MEB, he would not have agreed to the FPEB recommendation of medical retirement.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02440
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02440 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment (RE) code 4C, Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or void...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02457
The applicant was awarded service credit for his full-time work experience from 22 Jan 07 until the date that he was approved for appointment on 24 Jul 08 in accordance with AFI 36-2005, Table 2.5, Rule 41. However, in view of the fact that credit is only awarded for full-time work in a qualifying specialty, and he has provided evidence indicating that he began such work on 11 Aug 06, we believe the appropriate remedy in this case would be to award him credit for the period 11 Aug 06...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02458
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice. In this respect, In view of the fact he had already applied for retirement with a 12 Jun 10 effective date, and having no reason to believe he would not have elected to take part in this important benefit in conjunction with his planned retirement, we elect to resolve any doubt in this matter in behalf of the applicant and recommend the decedent’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02500
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02500 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized entry-level separation be upgraded to an honorable or general discharge. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02508
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM) is awarded to Air Force enlisted personnel during a three-year period of active military service. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with respect to the applicant’s requests for the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Unit Citation, Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR), Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02514
On 24 Oct 86, after consulting with legal counsel, the applicant offered a conditional waiver of his rights to an administrative discharge board, provided he receive no less than a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge if the recommendation for his discharge was approved. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-02514 in Executive Session on 27 Jan 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 1 Oct 10, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02525
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02525 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 20 Oct 08, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for Erroneous Enlistment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02526
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02526 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Applicant’s EPR profile is listed below: PERIOD ENDING OVERALL EVALUATION *15 May 10 4 15 May 09 5 15 May 08 5 15 May 07 5 15 May 06 5 15 May 05 5 *Referral Report The applicant did not file an appeal with the Evaluation Report Appeals Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02528
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 5 Jun 08, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for Unsatisfactory Participation, effective 28 May 08, with a Reenlistment eligibility status of “Ineligible.” The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02529
Members of the Board, Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Mr. Michael Janosov, and Ms. Patricia R. Collins considered this application on 6 January 2011. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Vice Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSIAR dtd 22 October 2010 AFBCMR BC-2010-02529 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02531
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02534
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS She underwent her TDRL re-evaluation in May 09 and the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB), after reviewing the results of the examination, recommended her removal from the TDRL and subsequent disability discharge with a disability rating of ten percent. In her rebuttal to SAFPC, she noted concern with her disability rating and felt that if she was unfit for duty, she should be given a disability rating of 30 percent, or be...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02537
INDEX CODE: 137.04 AFBCMR BC-2010-02537 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: FRANCIS J. YORIO III Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02576
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02576 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The narrative reason for separation (Fraudulent entry into Military Service/Drug Abuse) be changed on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty to allow him to enter the Army. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02579
A review of the nonjudicial punishment action reflects no error in the processing of the Article 15. The complete AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 13 Oct 10, copies of the investigative report and the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the applicant for his review and comment within 30 days, along with a request for documentation regarding his activities since leaving...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02581
The applicant does not deny any of the charges against her or that an error or injustice occurred during the court-martial process. She was trying to get away from another abusive person. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02582
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02582 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. On 29 Oct 82, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failure to go. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02584
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the AFLSA, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P).
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02588
The Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPMAF2 further states in computing constructive service credit, they count a period of time or qualification only once, and the advanced degree must not have been earned concurrently with the primary credentials. In the applicant’s case his advanced degree was earned concurrently with the primary credentials and the period of time earned...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02590
His correct RE code is “2C” (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without characterization of service) based on his receiving an involuntary entry level separation. The applicant has not submitted any evidence or identified any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02603
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02603 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation, “Disability Existed Prior to Service”, be changed to match the determination of the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) that her condition was service connected and rated at 40 percent. Further, it must be noted...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02604
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02604 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive Incapacitation Pay (INCAP Pay) for the periods 29 Jul 09 to 28 Jan 10, 29 Jan 10 to 28 Jul 10, and 29 Jul 10 to 28 Jan 11. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02613
AFBCMR BC-2010-02613 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02650
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02650 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for his separation (Fraudulent entry into Military Service) be changed on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty to allow him to reenter military service. The applicant’s complete submission, with...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02702
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02704
AFRC/A1A recommends denial, indicating there is no basis to assume the applicant would have been selected for position vacancy promotion by the lieutenant colonel promotion board, or hired as an AGR. We note the applicant filed an IG complaint alleging, among other things, that members of his chain of command unfairly denied him the opportunity to apply for multiple AGR positions and damaged his reputation by providing negative references to potential employers in retaliation for his...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02724
_________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2010-02724 in Executive Session on 20 Jan 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Aug 10, w/atchs. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 16 Nov 10. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Nov 10.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02727
Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to reflect that she made timely notification of his death so she may receive benefits under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The applicant states she was misinformed by the member’s ANG unit to wait until his 60th birthday (16 Jun 10) to file a claim for benefits. Exhibit B. Decedent’s Master Personnel Records.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02737
DPAPP notes a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and the documentation submitted failed to provide any evidence to substantiate any foreign service in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/STORM. DPSIDR states there was no documentation located in the applicant military personnel records to reflect he served in support of Operation DESERT SHEILD/STORM. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP, dated 1 Oct 10.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02777
AFBCMR BC-2010-02777 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02834
Although, the applicant contends his Senior Rater omitted several items from the PRF, he has failed to provide documentation to prove this or submitted a reaccomplished PRF with support from the Senior Rater and the MLR President. The Senior Rater does not support the applicant’s request to change the report or upgrade the PRF to a “Definitely Promote” Recommendation. The complete AFPC/DPSIDEP evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02838
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 1 Jul 10, the applicant’s injury was determined to be in the LOD. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we believe a preponderance of the evidence supports corrective action.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02840
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit B and C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR did not provide a recommendation because the request involves two potential beneficiaries. The complete AFPC/DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit C. SAF/MRB Legal Advisor recommends denial of the applicant’s request. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02912
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 7 Nov 75, the United States Court of Military Appeals declined to review the applicant’s case, making the findings and sentence final and conclusive under the UCMJ. We find no evidence which indicates the applicant’s service characterization, which had its basis in his court-martial conviction and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded the limitations set forth in the Uniform Code of Military...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02915
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS While the applicant’s service medical records indicate he was injured during enemy action while running to a bunker, the applicant did not provide the date of the injury or how it was sustained. Finally, with respect to his request for three bronze service star devices for his previously awarded Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), we note the Air Force office of primary responsibility has determined his eligibility for one Silver Service Star...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02919
The applicant’s request for discharge was voluntary and the Air Force discharged him as requested. The complete AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant comments that he is allowed to submit a case within three years after the discovery date which was April 2010, and the letter from SAF/MRBR dated 12 Aug 10, indicates his case was accepted. On 30 Dec 10, the Board staff...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02920
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-02920 in Executive Session on 16 Dec 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02933
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02943
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The applicant’s Coast Guard Achievement medal is on file in his SNCO Selection Record. The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.