Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02440
Original file (BC-2010-02440.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2010-02440

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Reenlistment  (RE)  code  4C,  Separated  for  concealment  of  juvenile
records, minority,  failure  to  meet  physical  standards  for  enlistment,
failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured  by  the  Air  Force
Reading Abilities Test, or void enlistments be change to a 1 or 3C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He needs his RE code changed to reenter military service.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to  this  application  are  contained  in  the
letter prepared by the appropriate office of the  Air  Force.   Accordingly,
there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA reviewed this application and recommends  denial.   DPSOA  states
the RE code  4C  the  applicant  received  at  the  time  of  discharge  was
erroneous.  The appropriate RE code is 2C, Involuntarily separated  with  an
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without  characterization  of
service.  His records will be administratively corrected to  reflect  an  RE
code of 2C.  A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 17  Dec  10
for review and comment.  As of this date, no response has been  received  by
this office (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence  of  error  or  injustice.    After   careful   consideration   of
applicant's  request  and  the  available  evidence  of  record,   we   find
insufficient evidence of error or injustice to  warrant  corrective  action.
The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based  on
the evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted  by  applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights  to  which  entitled,
appropriate regulations were not followed,  or  appropriate  standards  were
not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2010-
02440 in Executive Session on 16 Feb 11, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      , Panel Chair
      , Member
      , Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket  Number  BC-
2010-02440 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 17 Jun 10.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, dated 29 Nov 10.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Dec 10.





                                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02590

    Original file (BC-2010-02590.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His correct RE code is “2C” (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without characterization of service) based on his receiving an involuntary entry level separation. The applicant has not submitted any evidence or identified any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01662

    Original file (BC-2011-01662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01662 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-0425`1

    Original file (BC-2010-0425`1.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force. The applicant’s records will be administratively corrected to reflect the RE code “2C”, unless otherwise directed by the Board. SGPS states due to the fact the possibility of recurrence is unknown, they do not recommend the applicant reenter military service.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02975

    Original file (BC-2012-02975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 03 Feb 09. Airmen are given entry-level separation with uncharacterized service when separation is initiated within the first 180 days of continuous active service. While the applicant’s military personnel records indicate that he was erroneously issued an RE code of 4C, his correct RE code should be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03334

    Original file (BC-2011-03334.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 Apr 09, the applicant was furnished an entry level separation with uncharacterized service for erroneous enlistment, with an RE Code of 4C, and a narrative reason for separation of “Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03407

    Original file (BC-2011-03407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 September 2007, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to recommend the applicant for an entry-level separation for fraudulent enlistment under the provisions of Air Force Policy Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section C. The commander indicated the reason for his recommendation was that he received a medical narrative summary on the applicant, dated 7 September 2007, that indentified the applicant as not meeting minimum medical standards to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04753

    Original file (BC-2010-04753.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 6 May 2011, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). However, a recent medical evaluation submitted by the applicant indicates she does not present symptoms or reaction to bananas. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04534

    Original file (BC-2010-04534.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04534 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01571

    Original file (BC-2011-01571.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01571 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03614

    Original file (BC-2011-03614.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03614 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...