AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-00998
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter military service _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01081
His service-connected medical condition, arthritis of the back and neck and sinusitis (bronchitis) be reevaluated as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibits C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01140
The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. The applicant provides no evidence of an error or injustice with respect to his RE code, but only states that he was punished for being immature and uncertain of life when he was young. The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01212
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C through D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDEP recommends denial. The complete AFPC/DPSOO’s evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states AFI 36-2501,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01397
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the service characterization, was appropriately administered and within...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01419
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS In support of his request, the applicant provides excerpts from his military personnel records, which include copies of his enlistment record, honorable discharge certificate, and rosters related to his assignment at Wheeler Army Airfield, HI, and his subsequent hospitalization. After a thorough review of the available evidence, a majority of the Board is persuaded he is entitled to the PH Medal.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01553
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C, D and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAMN notes no BCMR action is warranted for the OSB reflecting board certified “no” for the 1 Dec 09 promotion board because the applicant did not submit the AF Form 2096 prior to the convening of the board. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01557
The complete AFRC/SGP evaluation is at Exhibit C. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends the record be changed to reflect the applicant was placed on active duty orders effective 1 Nov 09 and remained so until placed on the TDRL with an 80 percent disability rating effective 24 Jun 10. The complete AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01561
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The SJA did not agree with the General Court Martial (GCM) conviction and delayed his retirement so he would retire in the grade of staff sergeant rather than master sergeant. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01582
DPAPP states that neither the evidence of record nor the applicant’s military personnel record (MPR) substantiates that he served in Vietnam. Should the applicant provide sufficient evidence in the form of eyewitness statements, travel vouchers, or letters of evaluation to substantiate his eligibility for award of the VSM, we would be willing to reconsider his request. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01589
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was issued a general (under honorable conditions) discharge upon his separation from the Air Force. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010- 01589 in Executive Session on 11 Jan...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01591
He received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for the incident. The complete APFC/DPSIDEP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In support of his request the applicant submitted copies of emails between him and his rater regarding the LOR and referral OPR. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01595
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-01595 in Executive Session on 13 Jan 11, under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01596
On 10 Dec 10, NGB/A1PS informed the applicant that he had not exhausted the administrative remedies regarding his application for correction of his military records. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the existence...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01608
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The member and spouse were married on 8 Oct 41. DPSIAR states SBP is awarded to common-law spouses who properly validate they resided in a state that recognizes common-law marriages and the union existed for one full year – the required length of post-retirement marriages before the spouse becomes eligible as an SBP beneficiary. Moreover, all three of these requisites must exist at the same time.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01611
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01611 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. Having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we conclude that no basis exists to grant favorable action on...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01615
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of correspondence from the DVA and excerpts from his military personnel records, which include his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty , pre and post-deployment health assessments, and correspondence related to his medical disqualification from world-wide duty. While the evidence provided indicates he was retained on active duty for medical hold for nearly eight months, apparently due to a shoulder injury...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01631
However, they recommend denial of his request to change his 31 Jul 08 duty history entry on his OSB to reflect “Chief, Academic Advising, Executive Officer” as his duty title, indicating there is no evidence that he exercised due diligence to ensure his record was correct in this respect. He also had the option of submitting a letter to the board members prior to the board convening informing them of the correct entries on his OSB. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01632
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the United States Air Force , requires an RE code of 2C be issued based on the applicant’s entry-level separation with uncharacterized service. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-01632 in Executive Session on 20 Jan 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01636
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01636 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation “Fraudulent Entry into Military Service” and, his Reenlistment (RE) code “2C” (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01641
His records be corrected to show his Retention/Retirement (R/R) year (11 Aug 06 through 10 Aug 07) was a satisfactory year of Federal service. A complete copy of the AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we believe the applicant has raised sufficient doubt as to the circumstances surrounding the postponement of his Annual Training period.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01701
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The Commander, Air Force Reserve Command concurred and forwarded the request to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) on 22 Jun 10. The applicant’s initial request for an extension of her MSD was received and processed in a timely manner.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01728
AFBCMR BC-2010-01728 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01797
The base legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient to support the discharge. The discharge authority approved the separation and directed he be discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s general (under honorable conditions) discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander’s discretionary authority.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01815
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01815 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive payment for accrued annual leave at the time of his separation. The applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01828
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01828 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The applicant requests that her late father’s records be corrected to reflect his entitlement to the following awards and decorations: 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01840
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01840 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Based on the attachment to his application, dated 29 Apr 10, it appears he is requesting that his records be corrected to reflect he was disability retired with a 100 percent compensable rating. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01852
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01852 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 20 “Dates of Time Lost During This Period” be corrected to reflect no lost time. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01875
AFBCMR BC-2010-01875 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01876
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Because he is not entitled to the VSM and his service was outside the inclusive period of the award, the applicant is not eligible for the RVCM. We note the Air Force OPR has determined the applicant’s eligibility for the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V) and will correct his records administratively.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01893
His Referral Officer Performance Report (OPR), closing 1 Jun 09, be removed from his records. # Top Report at the time he was considered and nonselected for promotion to the grade of colonel by the CY09D Colonel CSB. The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01904
The overall recommendation on his most recent Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) was “Promote.” Prior to the report becoming a matter of record, the Senior Rater completed a PRF for the contested promotion board which contained a DE and job push. The CY10A CSB is the only board that considered the contested OPR in the promotion process.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01957
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS However, in accordance with 10 USC 12683 and AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members , he should have been discharged from ISLRS after three years, effective 2 Oct 01. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant correcting the applicant’s records to show that he was discharged from the Inactive Status List...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01966
Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service. The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 30 September 2009 he elected to transfer his Post 9/11 GI...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01983
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS His first IPZ board should have been the CY2009B CSB based on his commissioning date of 13 May 95. While the applicant contends that his three-year break in service, during which he served in the Air Force Reserve, caused him to be considered IPZ three years earlier than his commissioning year group, reserve officers ordered to active duty maintain their rank and DOR.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01985
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02029
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1POP does not make a recommendation and defers to the Board to make a determination regarding the applicant’s date of rank. However, they point out that a state has the authority to have a policy for promotion of their officers who would become overgrade upon promotion. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we find the evidence of record insufficient to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02048
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 17 Oct 45, the War Department announced that officers of all Reserve Components up to the grade of colonel who had not been promoted while on active duty would be promoted to the higher grade effected on the date they go on terminal leave, provided they served on active duty for two years and had an efficiency index of 35. The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02055
AFBCMR BC-2010-02055 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02066
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2010-02066 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02091
AFI 36-2504, paragraph 2.7 requires, among other things, that officers have an outstanding record with at least 50 points for a year of satisfactory service during the last full R/R year at the time of submission of the PRF to be considered by a PV promotion board. While the applicant met all the other requirements for consideration by the contested Board, he had not completed an R/R year as of either 18 Dec 09, or as of the date the Board convened on 1 Feb 10. Accordingly, we recommend...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02182
Criteria: Combat conditions defined: For the purposes of this award, the combat conditions are met when; Individual(s) deliberately go outside the defended perimeter to conduct official duties – either ground or air, and come under enemy attack by lethal weapons while performing those duties, and are at risk of grave danger or individual(s) are defending the base (on the defended perimeter), and come under fire and engage the enemy with direct and lethal fire, and are at risk of grave...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02184
The Air Force Board of Review on 25 Jan 61 found the findings and sentence correct in law and fact. He has not provided any evidence that his being AWOL was caused by racism or discrimination. Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2010-02184 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02189
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Only members who meet the criteria for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Vietnam) or VSM during the period of service are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN armed forces. Nonetheless, after careful review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we are convinced of his entitlement to the requested award.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02191
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. We find no evidence which indicates the applicant’s service characterization, which had its basis in his court-martial conviction and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded the limitations set forth in the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02202
DPAPP further requested the applicant provide official documentation, such as, travel vouchers, evaluation reports and letters of evaluation to substantiate his Foreign Service in Spain, France and Libya. DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s military personnel records do not reflect he served in Spain or Libya. After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the evidence of record his entitlement to Foreign Service credit for serving in Vietnam and the Philippines...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02211
Furthermore, Executive Order 12276 awarded the NDSM to all service members on active duty from 2 Aug 90 to 30 Nov 95 who were discharged under honorable conditions. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EALUATION: The applicant states the official character of his discharge is general, under honorable conditions and he served within the dates specified for the award. He was also...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02214
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Information regarding his service with the 1964th Communications Group in the Republic of Vietnam has been declassified since the time of his discharge. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with respect to the applicant’s request for credit for service in the Republic of Vietnam.