AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04867
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04867 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under SRP) be changed to allow him to reenlist. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04870
There was a miscommunication; she thought she had one year from the date her former spouse signed the DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage to comply, not one year from the date of the divorce. The complete DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit B. The applicant has not demonstrated that extraordinary circumstances exist as required for this Board to grant relief in cases of competing SBP beneficiaries.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04872
The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. AETC/SGPS notes the applicants separation was carried out in accordance with established policy and administrative procedures; however, they support changing the RE code should the Board grant the request. The complete AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: While he understands the basis for the decision the Air Force took at the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04874
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Code of JFC (Erroneous Enlistment) and Narrative Reason for Separation of Erroneous Entry (Other) be removed from his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04875
At the time of clearing from his off-post housing the inspector stated the home was in perfect condition and there were no damages to the rental property. In this respect, we note the applicant received a security deposit advance to pay for a three month security deposit, and when he PCSd early his security deposit was not returned to him by his landlord. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04876
Then, she was on convalescent leave and in rehabilitation until 17 Sep 11, and not permitted to leave the local area due to her medical condition. The applicant lost 16 days of leave because her extensive convalescent leave and rehabilitation precluded her from taking ordinary leave. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04879
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) that in addition to the administrative correction that will be made to document the applicants award of the AM with four (4) OLCs, his records also be corrected by this Board to reflect award of the AM (5th OLC). However, in addition to amending the special order, we believe a more appropriate remedy in this case would be to also...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04881
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04881 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 19 December 1989, the applicant was notified of his commanders intent to discharge him from the Air Force for irresponsibility in managing his personal finances. On 14...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04885
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04893
In addition, he submitted his rebuttal letters for his Letter of Counseling and Letter of Reprimand/Unfavorable Information File (UIF) which he received for the two FA failures prior to receipt of his referral EPR, and asks the Board members to consider them. ________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicants request due to insufficient medical evidence to support his claim of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04897
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04897 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation be changed from Pregnancy or Childbirth to Medical Retirement. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was discharged because of her pregnancy; however her...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04907
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial noting after a complete review of the applicant's case, there has been no official documentation located or provided to support award of the PH Medal or to verify his POW status. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04921
On 28 Feb 95, the findings and recommendations of the administrative discharge board were found legally sufficient and, the discharge authority directed the applicant be furnished a UOTHC discharge. Pursuant to the Boards request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report which is attached at Exhibit C. A copy of the FBI Investigative Report and a request for post- service information was forwarded to the applicant on 3 Jul 12 (Exhibit D). We...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04926
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04926 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her honorable discharge for pregnancy or childbirth be changed to a disability retirement. However, after a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicants complete submission, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04966
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04966 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official military records be corrected by having his Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 30 Aug 11, declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The member contends that his illness precluded him from attaining a...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04967
Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicants General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for misconduct was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the discharge authoritys discretion. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04970
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio component of his 7 Jul 11 FA be updated to reflect he was exempt in the AFFMS noting the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, indicates the applicant had a preexisting condition which precluded him from achieving a passing fitness score; and the AF Form 422,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04977
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04977 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect she was not released from active duty on 2 Sep 11, but was instead retained on active duty for medical continuation (MEDCON) until 16 Nov 11. Severalattempts were made to secure MEDCON orders with no responses...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04978
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04978 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of responsibility which is included at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04991
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force primary office of responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial of award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and/or the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The AFEM is awarded for deployed service to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05001
Had his situation been handled properly and he were continued on active duty in 2003; and based on his performance and military records; he would likely have been eligible for promotion consideration to the grade of Lieutenant Colonel in the fiscal year (FY) 2004 or 2005 promotion cycles. Lastly, due to the Board granting the applicant continuance on active duty orders until 15 April 2009, his request for all out-of-pocket medical expenses for the time between 2003 and 2009 is moot, as...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05004
10 U.S.C, § 12686(a) and AFI 36-2131 do not permit the Air Force to require waivers for members who are ordered to active duty for a period of 180 days or more. A complete copy of the AFMOA/SGHI evaluation is at Exhibit G. ________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel disagrees with AFMOA/SGHIs recommendation, and again points-out the applicant was placed on orders well in excess of 179 days while in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05018
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial noting a review of the applicants master personnel records and the documentation he provided do not substantiate he served in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05029
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) who, on or after August 1, 2009, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and satisfies the following service requirements, is eligible to transfer their unused educational benefits to a qualifying dependent: Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. The remaining...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05033
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial of the PH Medal and GCM, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. In a subsequent submission, Counsel also provides additional documentation concerning the applicants request for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05042
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends the AFBCMR approve the applicants request to void the contested report. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05043
Had he known about his cancer at the time of his retirement, he would have elected SBP coverage based on full retired pay. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates that his cancer was present prior to his retirement and provides copies of additional medical documentation as well as an extract from correspondence from the Department of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05052
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. He was clearly not afforded the time allowed to acclimatize after his arrival in Korea as the AFI directs before being scheduled for his FA, thus,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05053
Post 9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post 9/11 benefits to their dependents On 18 Feb 11, the applicant acknowledged and electronically signed the Post...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05063
Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jun 12, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05069
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05069 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His debt to the government in the amount of $9,308.39 be waived. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: An unjust debt was levied upon him for recoupment of a pro-rata share of the scholarship he...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05090
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05090 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to Honorable. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05108
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends removal of her 23 Aug 11 FA, however, recommends denial of her request to void and remove her 25 May 11 FA because the member was tested correctly. The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05113
Only members who meet the criteria for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Vietnam) or VSM during the period of service are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN armed forces. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05130
The applicant did not provide any evidence that an error or injustice occurred in the processing of his discharge warranting a change to his type of discharge or character of service. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 23 March 2012 for review and comment within 30 days. BY DIRECTION OF THE PANEL...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05131
At the time of his discharge, he was furnished a WD AGO Form 53-96, Military Record and Report of Separation Certification of Service, stating he received no wounds in action. DPSID was unable to locate any official medical documentation within the applicants official Military Personnel Records or medical records substantiating the applicant received and/or was treated for a shrapnel wound while serving in WWII, nor has the applicant provided any such documentation to support his claim. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05133
He was involuntarily extended beyond his retirement date, past his high year of tenure and should have been promoted to master sergeant so that the government could have legally retained him for trial. Furthermore, the specific time and date of the incident for which he was convicted could not be determined, so the government extended the time frame of the charges alleged. The time frame properly charged by the government was between, on or about 1 Jan 95 and on or about 30 Sep 97,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05135
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05135 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05255
On 9 Sep 2000, the applicant married; however, he did not request to update his RCSBP election within one year of his marriage. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05388
Had she known she would have been eligible for DVA benefits after two years of service, she would have held out for four more days to qualify. On 9 May 1984, she submitted her application for early separation due to pregnancy with a requested separation date of 15 Sep 1984. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05797
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05797 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His name be changed on his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty. In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of his passport, drivers license and DD Form 214. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2012-03393
AFBCMR BC-2012-03393 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to show that the AF Form 707, Officer Performance Report (Lt thru Col), rendered for the period 4 June 2010 through 1 October 2011, was...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC10-02528
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 5 Jun 08, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for Unsatisfactory Participation, effective 28 May 08, with a Reenlistment eligibility status of “Ineligible.” The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC2010-02528
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 5 Jun 08, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for Unsatisfactory Participation, effective 28 May 08, with a Reenlistment eligibility status of “Ineligible.” The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of...