RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02285
INDEX CODE: 128.14
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Based on the guidance of the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Department
of Veterans Affairs (DVA) website he believes he is eligible to transfer
benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill to his dependents. In October 2009,
he attended the Transition Assistance Program briefing and the DVA
representative had very little information on Post 9/11 GI Bill criteria
but advised that more information would be forthcoming and to check the DVA
website for updates.
Page 14 of the DOD regulation does not state that the individual has to be
on active duty to take advantage of the Post 9/11 GI Bill; it states you
just have to have served between the dates in the policy and fall under one
of the categories, which he does.
He believes DOD has distributed misleading, inconsistent and improperly
updated on the eligibility requirements for Post 9/11 GI Bill program.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides an extract from the
Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003: Post 9/11 GI Bill, and a copy of
AFPC/DPSIT letter with attachments.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 22 Apr 88, he contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air
Force. He was progressively promoted to the grade of master sergeant,
having assumed the grade effective and with a date of rank of 1 Sep 07. He
was retired on 1 Oct 09.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is
attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSI recommends denial. DPSI states service members may have had the
notion that being on active duty or in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) on the
effective date of the law, 1 Aug 09, was enough to “vest” them with the
right to transfer benefits at some time in the future. If those service
members had sought clarification from an educational counselor, read the
DOD or Air Force guidance that was very clear on that point, or taken other
measures to make a timely decision before their separation or retirement,
they could have initiated a timely transfer of benefits.
DPSI notes the Board could find that there was an injustice if the service
members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled
about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and
did not have ready access to DOD and Air Force guidance due to their
terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early, as 1
Aug 09 and there would be no need to place the service member on active
duty since the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) system allows for
correction of the record by Air Force personnel.
The complete HQ USAF/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant states the information he received from DTM 09-003, dated 22
Jun 09 was misleading because it states “Any member of the Armed Forces,
active duty…on or after 1 Aug 09.”
Although there were various news articles about Post 9/11 GI Bill; most
noted the requirement to be on active duty on the 1 Aug 09 effective date
of the Post 9/11 GI Bill to be eligible to transfer benefits.” He
literally took that to mean that if he were on active duty on or after 1
Aug 09, the he was eligible to transfer his benefits.
He also believed that if he was on active duty on the effective date of the
law he was vested with the right to transfer benefits at some time in the
future. He further believes he was unintentionally misled by the poor
wording in the DTM.
Furthermore, when he attended Transitional Assistance Program in 2009, the
briefer new very little about the Post 9/11 transfer rules. He was told to
keep in touch with the education office. Over the next 6-8 months, he
inquired about Post 9/11 and the education office said that it is a DVA
program and that he would have to contact them.
Lastly, he hopes the Board will see where the poor wording led him and
probably others to believe that as long as an individual was on active duty
on 1 Aug 09 the benefits were transferable.
The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. While we note the steps the Air Force
office of primary responsibility indicates were taken to inform eligible
personnel of this new benefit, it appears that through no fault of the
applicant he was not timely made aware of his eligibility and the steps
necessary to transfer his benefits to his dependents. In addition, we find
no basis to question the applicant's account in this matter and do not find
it reasonable that he would have knowingly elected not to pursue use of
this important entitlement. Therefore, we elect to resolve any doubt in
this matter in behalf of the applicant and recommend the records be
corrected as indicated below.
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the transfer of Post 9/11 GI Bill
Educational Benefits will be executed in accordance with the member’s
expressed preferences contingent upon the completion of the necessary
paperwork as indicated in the attached AFPC/DPSIT Memorandum within 30
days.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-
02285 in Executive Session on 1 Mar 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Nov 09, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIT, dated 7 May 10.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 May 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ USAF/A1PA, dated 30 Jul 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Aug 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01234
DPSIT states any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09 who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election can transfer their unused Post-9-11/GI benefits to their dependents. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-04574
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04574
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01072
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after August 1, 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00682
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: Has at least six (6) years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 August 2009, were not personally counseled...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03714
There were various news articles about the Post-9/11 GI Bill; most noted the requirement to be on duty on the 1 Aug 09 effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to be eligible to transfer benefits. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Oct 11 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01391
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He applied for the Post 9/11 GI Bill prior to retirement; however, the transferability portion of the benefit had not been established at that time and believes for that reason he should be given an opportunity to complete this transfer. The applicant states that he applied for the 9/11 GI Bill right before he retired (no date of when this happened), but the transferability requirement for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03679
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not adequately notified of the opportunity to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits prior to his retirement on 30 Sep 10. There were various news articles about the Post-9/11 GI Bill; most noted the requirement to be on duty on the 1 Aug 09 effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to be eligible to transfer benefits. ________________________________________________________________ The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00662
Several of his retired veteran friends have transferred their Post 9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to their children within months of their retirement or even after retirement with no additional service commitment required. He feels the Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because he was not aware of the ability to transfer Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits until speaking with several of his retired friends across the country. We took notice of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01574
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve (SelRes), officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election. The Air Force provided unfair and misleading information concerning Post 9-11 transferability by stating that enrolled members were...