AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01371
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01371 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: HARRY KONST HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect 20 years of active duty service, a subsequent active duty retirement, and a pilot bonus he would have received had he been selected for any one of several positions he had applied for but...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01371-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01371-2 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect 20 years of active duty service, a subsequent active duty retirement, and a pilot bonus he would have received had he been selected for any one of several fulltime positions he...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01381
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01381 INDEX CODE: COUNSEL: Vietnam Vets of America HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 Oct 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation, Personality Disorder, be corrected to reflect Adjustment Disorder. Applicant was discharged from the Air Force on 6 Jan 04. Therefore,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01398
He was serving in the grade of technical sergeant and had served 37 years, 6 months, and 22 days for pay at the time of his transfer to the Retired Reserve. Applicant has provided a different promotion recommendation form signed by a different supervisor (along with the same letter of recommendation by the different supervisor). Applicant’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01402
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states in accordance with AFI 36-3208, paragraph 10.4.4, members reduced to Senior Airman or below before reaching 12 years of service (YOS) will be allowed to remain in the Air Force until they reach 12 YOS, which is the normal high year of tenure (HYT). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01418
[Examiner’s Note: AFPC has administratively corrected the applicant’s record to reflect four awards of the AFAM] He be promoted to the grade of master sergeant (MSgt) as if selected during cycle 03E7. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the primary basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01431
Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Medical Consultant recommended denial noting the applicant was administratively discharged in 1963 for unsuitability due to passive- aggressive personality disorder (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - I (DSM-I). The DVA has granted service-connected disability compensation based on that psychiatrist's...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01432
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01432 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show satisfactory years of service for retention/retirement (R/R) year’s 17 April 1982 to 16 April 1983, 17 April 1984 to 16 April 1985, 17 April 1986 to 16 April 1987, and 17 April 1987 to 16 April...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01459
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01459 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 6 Nov 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2003A (CY03A) Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01465
The Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) considered and denied applicant’s request for the PH on 1 November 2005. Applicant’s personal statement is noted; however, after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, to include his service medical records, we find no corroborative evidence to establish that he was treated for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action during a rocket attack on 28 February 1968. ________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01497
On 1 February 2005, the applicant appealed the contested report under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluations Reports. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 June 2005, for review and response. Although letters of support were provided from the evaluators...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01530
DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records shows medical examinations dated 13 Jun 81, 11 Sep 82, 11 Jan 86, and 2 Dec 89 indicates he had normal hearing. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01531
On 5 December 1978, the MEB recommended he be forwarded to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that there is no evidence to support a higher disability rating at the time of the applicant’s separation. In deference to the comments of the BCMR Medical Consultant, which appear to be supported by the evidence of record, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01533A
_________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: The Board previously denied the applicant’s request above in executive session on 21 Jul 05 and 19 Sep 05 (Exhibit I). The applicant opines that after the Board reviews his new evidence, the letter written by his former group commander, and previously reviewed by the Board, supporting removal of the referral report from his Air Force records “makes perfect...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01535
The board recommended the applicant be permanently retired with a compensable rating of 60 percent. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 Jun 06 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01536
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Base on available records, the applicant, was an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) enlisted member with 17 years of satisfactory federal service. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/DPM reviewed this application and recommended denial, stating, in part, applicant states he completed all...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01541
On 14 Sep 88, the IPEB recommended that the applicant be permanently retired from the Air Force with a combined disability rating of 100%. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant recounts his previous contentions and requested his case be administratively closed (see Exhibit E). Based upon a review of the available evidence of record and the documentation provided in support...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01543
________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. While the applicant contends the actions which led to his discharge were the result of physiological problems he was experiencing at the time, a 26 November 1957 medical evaluation determined that he was free of any mental or physical defect and was capable of distinguishing right from wrong. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 8 Jun 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01544
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He retired after 19 years and 9 months of active duty service under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA). ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of applicant’s request stating, in part, a review of veteran’s personnel files shows that he is currently not eligible for compensation under CRSC since he did...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01551
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of applicant’s request stating, in part, although the veteran states he is rated at 100 percent disabled by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), a review of the Defense Finance and Accounting Services (DFAS) files and Air Force Military Personnel files indicates the veteran did not retire from military...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01552
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement and documentation associated with his CRSC application. No evidence, such as a medical report of accident report prepared at the time of the injury can be found. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01562
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air National Guard office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01570
The Military Personnel Database (MilPDS) indicates the applicant is a member of the Air Force Reserve currently serving in the grade of Master Sergeant (MSgt) (E-7) with a date of rank of 1 May 2005. DPB explains the applicant’s name did not appear on the HQ AETC promotion list for promotions effective 1 March 2005. Novel, Panel Chair Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 May 05 w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01582
On 22 October 2004, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending the applicant be separated from the Air Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section 5C, Defective Enlistments, paragraph 5.15, for Fraudulent Entry. The application was timely filed. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2005- 01582 in Executive Session on 10 January 2006, under...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01594
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01594 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 Nov 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, bronchitis, traumatic arthritis of left shoulder, traumatic arthritis of left second metacarpal, sinusitis, traumatic brain disease, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01611
Her AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board, dated 1 Oct 04, be changed in item 10d, Disability was the Direct Result of a Combat Related Injury, to reflect "Yes." Instrumentality of war is defined as "a vehicle, vessel, or device designed primarily for military Service and intended for use in such Service at the time of the occurrence of the injury. Further, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01622
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His request for separation was disapproved even though the Air Force Board for Corrections of Military Records (AFBCMR) rescinded his Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT)-incurred Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) of 18 October 2011 and the Record of Proceedings (AFBCMR Document Number BC-2004- 02126) stated that ACC/DOT would not hold him to his 10 June 2007 ADSC. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01634
She sought care in Sep 03 and was diagnosed with asthma based on clinical history and PFTs showing mild obstruction to airflow and response to treatment with bronchodilator. Medical standards for continued military duty indicate that asthma, recurrent bronchospasm, or reactive airway disease, unless due to well- defined avoidable precipitant cause is disqualifying for worldwide duty. A complete copy of the AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01646
On 31 Mar 88, he voluntarily retired from the Air Force in the grade of staff sergeant, having served 20 years and 17 days on active duty. While his conditions are deemed service connected by the DVA, their standards for approval focus on connecting the claimed disabilities to his period of service. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01650
Additionally, the DVA is not providing compensation to him for his bronchitis. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Jun 05 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01659
DPP states to establish eligibility for Reserve retired pay a member must complete 20 years of satisfactory Federal service and have the last 8 years of qualifying service in a Reserve component. DPP asserts since he does not have 20 years of satisfactory service, he is not entitled to Reserve retired pay or any benefits associated with it. His retirement order did authorize an Armed Forces Identification Card at the time of his retirement, but since the member is not entitled to Reserve...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01672-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01672 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). The Board noted the applicant’s accomplishments since leaving the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01699
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01699 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 Nov 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, limited motion of the lumbar spine, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01713
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01713 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 27 SEPTEMBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to elect coverage under TRICARE Reserve Select (TRS). He has been informed that he is not eligible for TRS because he was not in an active reserve status at the time he...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01725
On 8 Jul 03, the applicant was notified by her military training flight (MTF) commander she was recommending the applicant’s discharge from the Air Force for conditions that interfere with military service, mental disorders. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 Jun 06 for review and comment within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01726
On 7 and 23 June 1978, she failed to report for duty, for which she received two failures to repair letters. Upon the recommendation of the Air Force Personnel Board, on 24 June 1981, the Secretary of the Air Force approved her request to upgrade her RE code to RE-1. Although the applicant contends she should have been medically discharged, she provides no documentary evidence to support that she was unfit for continued military service at the time of her discharge from the Air Force.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01738
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01738 INDEX CODE: 107.00 (Member/Uncle) COUNSEL: None (Applicant/Nephew) 063-14-5768 HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 29 NOV 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncle be awarded the Silver Star (SS) [or some other fitting award - See Exhibit E] for heroic actions performed in World War II...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01764
INDEX CODE: 135.02 BC-2005-01764 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01766
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01766 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 November 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable and his reenlistment code be changed. ____________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01769
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He does not have a DD Form 214 showing active duty time while serving in the Air Force Reserve from 1954 to 1966. On 5 Dec 43, he was commissioned in the Reserve grade of second lieutenant in the US Army Air Corp and entered extended active duty (EAD). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01780
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01780 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 DEC 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. The BCMR Medical Consultant states the applicant was disability separated for chronic headaches after a period of time on the TDRL. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01789
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was diagnosed with thyroid cancer, which provided clinical evidence that she had a real medical problem that produced the symptoms and conditions used to suggest the diagnosis of Dysthymia and Personality Disorder. She was diagnosed with thyroid cancer only four months after her discharge from the Air Force. The BCMR Medical Consultant concludes that the applicant’s diagnosis of personality...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01789-2
The applicant’s additional submission consisted of a five page article by Douglas Brodie, MD, titled “The Cancer Personality: Its importance in Healing.” _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing the complete evidence of record along with the applicant’s latest submission, we are not persuaded that the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice. We find the information contained in the applicant’s latest...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01792
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01792 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 DEC 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. On 26 September 1995, the applicant was tried by a General Court- Martial for wrongful use of marijuana and cocaine for which he pled guilty. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01799
DPPRS concludes the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, and did not provide any facts warranting a change to his reenlistment eligibility code. DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In a personal statement dated 25 July 2005, the applicant reiterates his reasons for wanting to enter active duty service. At...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01803
There is no evidence the entries in the service medical record are in error or that the source of information was other than the applicant himself. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 25 August 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Michael J. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Jul 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01804
As a result, the following is the only known information pertaining to the applicant’s service and was extracted from the partially reconstructed record and from documents provided by the applicant. After a thorough review of his submission and the supporting documentation he provided, these documents do not persuade us that he should be awarded the Purple Heart Medal. However, should the applicant provide the above information or testimony from other former members of his unit who were...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01815
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01815 (CASE 6) XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 2 Feb 01 through 1 Feb 02 be declared void and removed from his records, and the attached reaccomplished OPR be accepted...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01816
By letter, dated 29 Nov 05, the applicant requested that his “Do Not Promote” PRFs also be removed from his records, and that he be provided SSB consideration based on the new information obtained from a CDI, which is attached at Exhibit E. By electronic mail (e-mail), dated 5 Dec 05, the applicant provided additional documentary evidence for the Board’s consideration, which is attached Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01818
DPF states her case file shows no evidence the applicant was directed to weigh-in regardless of her menstrual cycle prior to 10 February 2003; therefore, they recommend denial of her request to upgrade her EPR closing 25 January 2003. Accordingly, it is recommended the record should be corrected as indicated below. Exhibit H. Applicant’s Rebuttal, dated 8 Nov 05.