ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01672
INDEX CODE: 110.02
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his bad conduct
discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was discharged with a BCD in the grade of airman basic on 4
Oct 56. He was credited with 3 years, 3 months, and 3 days of active duty
service (excluding 346 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement).
On 21 Sep 05, the AFBCMR considered and denied the applicant’s request to
have his BCD upgraded to a general discharge. (A copy of the Record of
Proceedings, with exhibits, is at Exhibit I.
On 26 Oct 06, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration,
requesting his BCD be upgraded on the basis of clemency. He explained the
circumstances surrounding his courts-martial and subsequent discharge; and
his accomplishments since leaving the service. Applicant disagrees with
some of the charges on the FBI report, specifically surrounding the charges
of grand larceny of an automobile. Additionally, he provides letters of
recommendation to support his appeal for clemency.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit J.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support
of the appeal, we remain unpersuaded that the applicant’s discharge was
erroneous or unjust. The Board noted the applicant’s accomplishments since
leaving the service, including the numerous letters of character reference
and support submitted in his most recent submission. However, no evidence
has been presented which would lead us to believe that the applicant’s
service characterization was improper. Therefore, based on his overall
record of service, the numerous courts-martial which resulted in his bad
conduct discharge, and the contents of the FBI report, we found no evidence
warranting an upgrade of the characterization of the applicant’s discharge
on the basis of clemency.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 15 November 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
Mr. Wallace F. Beard Jr., Member
Mr. Patrick C. Daugherty, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit I. Record of Proceedings, dated 18 September 1987,
with Exhibits.
Exhibit J. Applicant’s Letter, undated, with attachments.
B. J. WHITE-OLSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-1984-02567-2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation, and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. In his request for reconsideration, the applicant contends that he has submitted new evidence in the form of bank statements, a letter from his pastor, and statements from friends and neighbors (Exhibit G). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00626A
However, according to a National Archives & Records Administration Form 13038, dated 27 Oct 05, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 13 Jun 55, was discharged in the grade of airman third class on 18 Sep 58, but with a general (under honorable conditions) characterization. In their conclusions, the Board strongly suggested the applicant submit additional official documents, as his records were destroyed and the details of his military service and discharge could not be clearly or...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02816
On 30 November 1961, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request to upgrade his discharge to honorable. However, as of this date, no response has been received. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence of error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY1996 | BC 1996 02123 2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1996-02123 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 12 Jun 98, a similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board. Pursuant to the Boards request, the applicant provided a copy of a letter from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00455
Additionally, the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, and he provided no facts warranting change to his under honorable conditions (general) discharge The complete DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his letter dated 1 Apr 07, the applicant requested an extension in order to reply to the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03451
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the FBI provided a copy of an Investigative Report pertaining to the applicant, which is at Exhibit B. However, in view of the contents of the FBI report, we are not persuasive that his discharge warrants an upgrade based on clemency. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00774
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00774 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NO XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 SEP 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His other than honorable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Therefore, the facts surrounding his service in the Air Force cannot be verified. The only other basis upon which to upgrade his...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00523
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00523 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions) and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to an eligible code. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01051
173, dated 26 July 1954, his punishment consisted of a BCD, confinement for three months and forfeiture of $25.00 of pay for three months. The applicant did not provide any other facts to warrant an upgrade of his discharge. On 9 May 2005, the Board staff requested the applicant provided documentation regarding his activities since leaving military service.
His one Airman Performance Report (APR) for the period closing 29 Sep 72 has an overall rating of 6. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded his general discharge should be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 17 December 2002 under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Panel...