RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01562
INDEX CODE: 135.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her record be changed to show she earned 24 points during her
Retention/Retirement (R/R) year of 26 July 1988 to 25 July 1989.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She transferred from the Florida Army National Guard (FLARNG) to the
California Air National Guard (CAANG) in early 1989. She was not
awarded participation points for the time she served during her
transfer to include time served for equipment draw, uniform issue,
additional attendance and training in preparation for transition to
her new Air Force Specialty and being part of the planning committee
for her new organization’s picnic. She was assigned but not aware of
the point’s only system for performing duty.
She separated from the FLARNG effective 19 July 1988; however it took
the FLARNG a full year to produce a discharge order. Though she was
processed into the CAANG effective 1 September 1988, it wasn’t until 3
June 1989 that she was officially assigned to the CAANG and allowed to
participate.
In support of her appeal, the applicant has provided copies of her
FLARNG transfer order and portions of her CAANG appointment package.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
She began military service on 7 August 1984. She was commissioned on
26 July 1985 and was progressively promoted to the grade of major with
a date of rank (DOR) of 1 October 1999. In her 19 years, 5 months,
and 11 days of satisfactory service, she has only one unsatisfactory
year of service which was her R/R year of 26 July 1998 to 25 July
1989. She is currently serving in the CAANG.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ANG/A1POF recommends denial. A1POF contends she has provided no
documentation to show she performed duty during the specified period
of time in either a paid or non-paid status. A1POF states they would
reconsider her request should she provide pertinent documentation that
would support her request.
A1POF’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
19 May 2006 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air
National Guard office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-01562 in Executive Session on 11 July 2006, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member
Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Apr 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, ANG/A1POF, dated 10 May 06.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 May 06.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02632
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 4 June 1985. Between 4 June 1989 and 3 June 1992 his record indicates service with a Reserve component where he accumulated three satisfactory years of service towards a Reserve retirement – part of which the record shows was spent in the CAANG. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01503
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01503 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His National Guard Bureau Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be changed to show he earned the Small Arms Marksmanship Ribbon. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00746
Prior to being released on 26 June 2004, he requested additional orders so he may remain on active duty until the MEB had heard his case and made a final decision on it. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was not released from active duty with the Air National Guard on 21 January 2006, but was continued on active duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03210
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03210 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to wear the New York Conspicuous Service Cross, with device and the Shoulder Sleeve Insignia for Wartime Service during service with other services with the understanding the Shoulder Sleeve Insignia for Wartime...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02034
In February 2007, the applicant was considered but was not selected for promotion by the FY08 Reserve Major Promotion Board. She ended up meeting the promotion board in the same Category E position as the first board. DPB states there is no apparent error in her Officer Selection Record (OSR) that could result in Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration in lieu of either the FY07 or FY08 USAFR Major Promotion Boards.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03053
The State HQ based their denial of his promotion on ANG Instruction (ANGI) 36-2502, wherein it is stated members on 4-P (permanent) medical status are not eligible for promotion consideration. A1POF contends he was denied promotion on 6 February 2004 by the TXANG as he was ineligible in accordance with ANGI 36-2502, Promotion of Airmen, and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03582
A1POF’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant agrees with the ANG that his discharge was handled with all applicable regulations, however, the WYANG acted on “bad” information provided by his doctor. He contends he was too young at the age of 38 to have contracted a bipolar disorder and instead asserts he suffered from a “situation” disorder based on many personal changes...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03913
Therefore, he should have been promoted via the Reserve Office Promotion Act (ROPMA) in 1999, his seventh year of time in grade (TIG) as a captain. A1POF states he was, in fact, considered by the fiscal year 2000 (FY00) Air National Guard Major mandatory promotion board and was not selected making him a once-deferred officer. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air National...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01561
On that day he and 18 other Guardsmen were getting ready to fly home (Baltimore), when they were told the C-130 aircraft taking them home was going to practice a ‘Hot Start’ meaning all the guardsmen would have to run and jump on the back lift of the aircraft as it taxied to the active runway. Due to this injury, he was not able to complete his physical fitness training and was discharged in March 1989 after serving for over 17 years. ...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-2004-00368
However, in accordance with Title 37, United States Code, Section 206[e], while a member may be allowed by their commander to perform duty to make up missed Unit Training Assemblies (UTA’s) for retirement points, the duty must be performed within their R/R, or anniversary, year. They state the member made up the time outside the parameters of the affected R/R year making the one point she earned attributable to her next R/R year of 30 January 2003 through 29 January 2004 instead of the...