Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01789-2
Original file (BC-2005-01789-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-01789-2

      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her disability discharge with severance be  changed  to  a  disability
retirement.

_________________________________________________________________

Resume of Case:

On 28 Sep 06, the AFBCMR  considered  and  denied  the  above  request
(Exhibit F).  In a letter dated 4 Oct 06 (Exhibit  G),  the  applicant
submitted information she had intended to include with her rebuttal to
the BCMR Medical  Consultant  advisory.   Since  the  information  was
received subsequent to the Board’s consideration and decision, it  was
forwarded  to  the  Board  as  a  request  for  reconsideration.   The
applicant’s additional submission consisted of a five page article  by
Douglas Brodie, MD, titled “The Cancer Personality:  Its importance in
Healing.”

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

After again reviewing the complete evidence of record along  with  the
applicant’s latest submission, we are not persuaded that the applicant
has been the victim of an error or injustice.  We find the information
contained in  the  applicant’s  latest  submission  coupled  with  her
previous  submission  insufficient  to  overcome  the   findings   and
recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant.  Accordingly, we  again
recommend that the requested relief be denied.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of probable  material  error  or  injustice;
that the application was denied without  a  personal  appearance;  and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission  of
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence   not   considered   with   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this  application  again
in Executive Session on 17 Oct 06 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. James W. Russell, III, Panel Chair
      Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
      Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member

The following additional documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit F.  Record of Proceedings, dated 11 Oct 06, w/atchs.
    Exhibit G.  Letter, Applicant, dated 4 Oct 06, w/atch.




                                   JAMES W. RUSSELL, III
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00536

    Original file (BC-2005-00536.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    After careful consideration of the applicant's submission along with the evidence of record, we see no evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change in her RE code. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03326

    Original file (BC-2005-03326.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The BCMR Medical Consultant states the applicant experienced approximately four episodes of loss of consciousness (syncope) while on active duty diagnosed as seizure disorder leading to disability discharge. The cardiology evaluation concluded her episodes of syncope in service were due to vaso-depressor syncope. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, it is our opinion that given the circumstances surrounding her separation from the Air Force,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01789

    Original file (BC-2005-01789.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was diagnosed with thyroid cancer, which provided clinical evidence that she had a real medical problem that produced the symptoms and conditions used to suggest the diagnosis of Dysthymia and Personality Disorder. She was diagnosed with thyroid cancer only four months after her discharge from the Air Force. The BCMR Medical Consultant concludes that the applicant’s diagnosis of personality...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-04019A

    Original file (BC-2003-04019A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant stated that on the advice of his Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) hearing officer, he should request the Air Force correct his records so that he would be rated for his condition of “Filariasis.” The applicant was advised by the AFBCMR in a letter dated 19 Apr 05 that his request did not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board (Exhibit G). On 28 Sep 05, the AFBCMR responded to a second Congressional Inquiry (Exhibit I), which asked that it be explained to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01381

    Original file (BC-2005-01381.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01381 INDEX CODE: COUNSEL: Vietnam Vets of America HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 Oct 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation, Personality Disorder, be corrected to reflect Adjustment Disorder. Applicant was discharged from the Air Force on 6 Jan 04. Therefore,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03480

    Original file (BC-2006-03480.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant opines no change in the records is warranted. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01725

    Original file (BC-2005-01725.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 Jul 03, the applicant was notified by her military training flight (MTF) commander she was recommending the applicant’s discharge from the Air Force for conditions that interfere with military service, mental disorders. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 Jun 06 for review and comment within 30 days. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00883

    Original file (BC-2005-00883.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, w/attachments, is at Exhibit A. Based on documentation provided by the applicant he did retire from the Air Force Reserve in part due to having a condition that made him physically disqualified for active duty. Applicant appealed the unfit decision to the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) on 1 Apr 04.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03264

    Original file (BC-2005-03264.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03264 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 APRIL 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that he received a service connected disability pension. The remaining relevant medical facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00607

    Original file (BC-2006-00607.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Prior to his separation he was briefed that his severance pay would be calculated based on his (total years of service) times (base pay X 2). The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He finds it difficult to believe that his information could have been misunderstood given the...