Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01544
Original file (BC-2005-01544.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-01544
            INDEX NUMBER:  136.00

      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED: NO


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  10 NOV 2006


___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He  be  entitled  to  Combat-Related  Special  Compensation  (CRSC)
benefits.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He retired after 19 years and 9 months of active duty service under
the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA).  He does not  know
Congress’s specific reasoning behind the 20-year  requirement.   It
seems if a member  was  injured  during  combat  or  combat-related
training, they are just as  deserving  whether  they  retired  with
20 years, or 19 years and 9 months, as in his case.

Congress authorized the DOD to implement  TERA  to  assist  in  the
downsizing of the military  in  the  early  1990s.   He  and  other
personnel were asked to retire  early  to  help  solve  a  critical
budget problem facing the DOD.   They  took  significant  risks  in
retiring early and there were no negative stigmas  associated  with
leaving early under TERA, and they felt  they  were  doing  a  good
service for their country.  Additionally, they  were  advised  that
they would be eligible for all benefits due a retiree with 20 years
of service.

He asks for a review of his  circumstances  and  hopefully  leaving
active duty three months early will not result in a  penalty  to  a
deserving veteran.

In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal  statement
and copy of his CRSC application and decision, with attachments.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant was retired effective 1 Aug 94, under the Temporary Early
Retirement Authority (TERA).  He completed 19 years, 9 months,  and
1 day of active federal military service.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial  of  applicant’s  request  stating,  in
part, a review of  veteran’s  personnel  files  shows  that  he  is
currently not eligible for compensation under CRSC since he did not
serve 20 years or more of  active  duty.   He  does  not  meet  the
mandatory criteria for  compensation  under  the  CRSC  program  as
outlined under the provisions of Public Law 107-134.

The Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program, established
by Public  Law  (PL)  107-314,  provides  compensation  to  certain
retirees with combat-related disabilities.  A retired member of the
Uniformed Services must meet each of the four following  conditions
to meet the preliminary CRSC criteria:

      a.  Has 20 or more years of active service in  the  Uniformed
Services for the purpose of computing the amount of retired pay, or
is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of Title 10,  United
States Code, unless such retirement is under section 12731b of that
same title.

      b.  Is in retired status.

      c.  Is entitled to retired  pay,  notwithstanding  that  such
retired pay may be reduced due to receipt of Department of Veterans
Affairs (DVA) disability compensation.

      d.  Has qualifying disability ratings (percentages)  [retiree
must be entitled to compensation for service-connected disabilities
under 10 USC 38 by the DVA].

             Qualifying  Combat-Related  Disability:   Member   has
combat-related  disabilities  (which  includes  any  Purple   Heart
disabilities) that are compensated by the DVA.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant
on 22 July 2005 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of  this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).

Applicant provided a change of address by letter, dated 27 Jul 05.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient  relevant   evidence   has   been   presented   to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of  the
Air  Force  office  of  primary  responsibility  and  adopt   their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that  the  applicant  has
not been the victim of an error or injustice.   Therefore,  in  the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-
01544 in Executive Session on 13 January 2006, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 Apr 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter,      HQ AFPC/DPPD, dated 18 Jul 05.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Jul 05.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01770

    Original file (BC-2005-01770.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of applicant’s request stating, in part, applicant’s personnel files show that he is currently not eligible for compensation under CRSC since he did not serve 20 years or more of active duty. Additionally, applicant retired in 1995, several years before the establishment of the CRSC program. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03086

    Original file (BC-2005-03086.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of applicant’s request stating, in part, a review of the Defense Finance and Accounting Services (DFAS) files and Air Force Military Personnel files indicates applicant was retired after 17 years, 1 month, and 5 days of active service, under TERA. Since he did not complete at least 20 years of active service, he is not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02553

    Original file (BC-2003-02553.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. c. Is entitled to retired pay, notwithstanding that such retired pay may be reduced due to receipt of Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) disability compensation. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that relief should be granted.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02736

    Original file (BC-2003-02736.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Has 20 or more years of active service in the Uniformed Services for the purpose of computing the amount of retired pay, or 7200 or more Reserve retired points. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that relief should be granted.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01570

    Original file (BC-2004-01570.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Has 20 or more years of active service in the Uniformed Services for the purpose of computing the amount of retired pay, or is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of Title 10, United States Code, unless such retirement is under section 12731b of that same title. c. Is entitled to retired pay, notwithstanding that such retired pay may be reduced due to receipt of Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) disability compensation. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02670

    Original file (BC-2003-02670.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant’s pay records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) reflects she waived her Air Force retired pay for the purpose of receiving disability compensation through the Department of Veterans Affair (DVA). ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-03541

    Original file (bc-2003-03541.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Has 20 or more years of active service in the Uniformed Services for the purpose of computing the amount of retired pay, or 7200 or more Reserve retired points. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-03541 in Executive Session on 10 March 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member Mr....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01631

    Original file (BC-2005-01631.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Qualifying Combat-Related Disability: Member has combat-related disabilities (which includes any Purple Heart disabilities) that are compensated by the DVA. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00503

    Original file (BC-2005-00503.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00503 INDEX NUMBER: 136.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 AUG 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband be entitled to benefits under the Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program. Has 20 or more years of active service in the Uniformed Services...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02124

    Original file (BC-2006-02124.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02124 INDEX NUMBER: 136.00 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 JAN 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be eligible for benefits under the Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...