___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Upon his release from active duty, he transferred to the Air Force Reserve and never received an orientation from his unit of assignment on the requirements needed for proper credit toward a good year for retirement. If he had that support upon his assignment to the Cat B position in the Air Force Reserve, he would not be asking for the credit. ...
AFBCMR 01-02542 Index Code: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPWB states that this decoration does not meet the criteria for promotion credit during the 01E7 cycle because there is no tangible evidence the decoration was placed into official channels prior to the date selections for the 01E7 cycle were made. A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). DAVID C. VAN GASBECK Panel Chair Exhibits: A.
Both the commander and the indorser provide information on why although they originally supported the rating given the applicant, later determined that it was not a fair or objective evaluation. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded to the Air Force evaluations. Exhibit F. Memorandum, Applicant, dated 15 Nov 01.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant’s response is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AFBCMR 01-02566 INDEX NUMBER: 137.02 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
The diagnosis was defective attitude with no evidence of classifiable psychiatric disease. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded his general discharge should be upgraded to honorable. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Aug 02 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 6 Sep 02.
On 30 Mar 94, the Board reconsidered and denied the applicant’s appeal, requesting that his records be corrected to show that he was selected for promotion to the grade of colonel, Air Force Reserve, by the FY78 Reserve of the Air Force Reserve Colonel Overall Vacancy Selection Board, which convened on 3 Oct 77; and, by amendment, his record of performance be recreated as it would have been had it not been for the illegal wing policy and his reconstructed record be submitted to a promotion...
AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 8301958A2
On 26 May 1999 and 12 May 2000, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his bad conduct discharge to either general (under honorable conditions) or a medical discharge. A complete copy of the Addendum to the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit F. In a letter dated 25 September 2000, the applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be changed to a medical discharge. ...
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit F. ___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C). Exhibit G. FBI Report. Exhibit H. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 7 Dec 00.
_________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied. BENEDICT A. KAUSAL Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Case of , Docket Number 88-002610 I have carefully reviewed all aspects of this case and do not agree with the opinion of the majority of...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F. On 25 September 2000, applicant submitted additional documentation and requested reconsideration. (Exhibit G). We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency.
In letters to Senators Nickles and Inhofe, the applicant provided additional evidence and requests that the Board reconsider his application (Exhibits X-CC). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...
_______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluated this application and recommends that the applicant’s request be denied. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceeding is attached at Exhibit F. In support of his request for reconsideration, applicant provided a five-page statement that addresses the Board’s previous conclusion, a copy of his previous case, and statements from two of his supervisors at the time he was considered but not selected for promotion. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 9600745A3
_________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF THE CASE: On 26 Aug 97, the Board considered and denied an application for correction of military records pertaining to the applicant, in which he requested that his UOTHC discharge be upgraded to honorable. Accordingly, a majority of the Board recommends that the applicant’s UOTHC discharge be upgraded to honorable. The following additional documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit G. Record of Proceedings,...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceeding is attached at Exhibit C. In support of his request for reconsideration, applicant provided a letter with attachments detailing his post-service activities (Exhibit D). _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 1 October 1952, he was honorably discharged and furnished a Honorable...
It appears to DAS that MPPU is recommending the applicant be promoted to captain effective 15 May 1993, prior to his appointment in the Air Force Reserve. Upon completion of the Medical Diploma (MD), a reappointment application must be completed and submitted to ANG/DPPS in accordance with AFI 36-2005, Appointment in Commissioned Grades and Designation and Assignment in Professional Categories - Reserve of the Air Force and United States Air Force. A review of his state records revealed...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibits A through E. In a letter, dated 12 February 1999, the applicant provided a copy of his performance report rendered while he was assigned to Thailand and requested reconsideration of his appeal (Exhibit F). The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit H. The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds,...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00606 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dismissal from the Air Force be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Associate Chief, Military Justice Division, Air Force...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00833 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) for promotion to the grade of staff sergeant, Air National Guard, be changed from 1 Sep 96 to 1 May 83, which would allow him to be promoted to the grade of technical sergeant effective 15 Nov 97. However, when he...
She further asserts that, to date, the Air Force is unable to validate any of the documentation used to deny her an entitlement to SBP. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...
____________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 2 October 1945, he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight during the period 30 July 1944 through 12 March 1945. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, w/atchs. TERRY A....
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03208 INDEX CODE: COUNSEL: MR. ALAN K. HAHN HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Board set aside two Article 15 punishments imposed upon him on 11 Dec 95 and 12 Sep 96; set aside the Secretary of the Air Force’s (SAF) decision to retire him in the grade of major; and, that he be retired in the grade of...
The inconsistencies between the duty titles on his Office Performance Reports (OPRs) and those listed on his Officer Preselection Brief (OPB) prior to his consideration for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by the P0498B central board have been administratively corrected. A complete copy of this evaluation is appended at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the advisory...
The board, however, did find that, on 28 February 1994, the applicant falsified an official document, the AF Form 24, that indicated she had graduated from the USC with a Chemical Engineering degree. On 25 April 1997, the Air Force Personnel Board (AFPB) reviewed the PODB’s decision and agreed that the applicant should not be retained in the Air Force. The records indicate her service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00210 INDEX CODE: 100.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His name be changed from Sutterfield to Satterfield. After reviewing the evidence submitted with this appeal, the majority of the Board is persuaded that the applicant’s records should be changed. The following documentary evidence was...
In further support of the appeal, applicant also submits character reference letters, certificates of achievements, the Article 15 and counsel’s letter to the 403rd WG/JA requesting applicant’s file(s). The applicant’s complete response is attached at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: An affidavit was received from the 403rd AW/SJA in response to the Board’s request for review and comments concerning counsel’s...
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a personal statement, a statement from the rater and statements from individuals outside the rating chain. They further state, to grant a direct promotion would be unfair to all other officers who have extremely competitive records and also did not get promoted. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Enlisted Promotion and Military Testing Branch, AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) Memorandum, dated 7 Jun 00, directing that the applicant be provided supplemental consideration for promotion to the grade of senior master sergeant. Regarding the supplemental promotion consideration, the Enlisted Promotion and Military Testing Branch (AFPC/DPPPWB)...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E. On 2 February 2000, applicant submitted a letter requesting that his RE code be changed. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit G. ____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 18 August 2000, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. Therefore, we agree with the opinions...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Teddy L. Houston, Mr. John L. Robuck, and Mr. Edward H. Parker considered this application on 8 May 2001. TEDDY L. HOUSTON Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ USAF/JAG, dtd 23 Apr 01, with attachment AFBCMR 99-01391 INDEX CODE: 129.01 MEMORANDUM FOR THE...
During the contested time period, a Safety Investigation Board (SIB) was conducted to investigate a mishap on 24 February 1999 involving an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in Kuwait in which the applicant was the mishap pilot. They have difficulty seeing how a Safety Investigation Board (SIB) or SIB investigation can be construed as personal to the applicant or related to his own military records. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01418 INDEX CODE 110.02 100.06 xxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: No xxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason on her DD Form 214 be changed from “Personality Disorder” to one that more accurately reflects her diagnosis and her military record reflect she is fit for military service. Since the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01026 INDEX CODE: A68.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge(BCD) be upgraded to general. Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request,...
____________________________________________________________________________ ___ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: A formal complaint was filed with the Military Equal Opportunity Office from 14 May 1999 to 28 July 1999 which was substantiated and the EPR in question was written while the complaint was being investigated. ____________________________________________________________________________ ___ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the Air Force Evaluations the applicant...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. David C. VanGasbeck, Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, and Mr. Joseph A. Roj, considered this application on 6 February 2001. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPTR, dtd 4 Dec 00 AFBCMR 99-02050 INDEX CODE: 110.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
On 19 December 2000, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s requests for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change of reason for discharge, and change of RE code. A copy of the AFDRB Hearing Record is at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's requests for reinstatement of his former grade of senior airman and change of RE code and provided advisory opinions to the Board (Exhibit D). The AFDRB Hearing Record and advisory...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. Members of the Board Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, and Ms. Marilyn Thomas considered this application on 18 April 2001 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C.
Since he was on active duty at the time of the surgery, he is limited to disability retirement as compensation for the damages done to him. As stated by the applicant, it was his own decision to retire early, and not one forced by his sleep or post-surgical problems. The VA finds the applicant’s sleep apnea condition, by itself, 50% disabling.
The IG investigation was completed on 18 March 1998, and found two of the applicant’s 15 allegations (performance feedback was not completed, as indicated on the report and the rater falsified the report when he indicated otherwise) substantiated. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that it...
Due to the lack of sufficient evidence provided by the applicant, denial is recommended (see Exhibit B). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In further support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his SGLV Form 8286 (see Exhibit D). Documents provided indicate that on 20 Mar 97, the applicant completed the appropriate paperwork electing SGLI coverage in the amount of $50,000.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-02960 INDEX CODE: 131.09, 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be advanced to the grade of senior master sergeant (E-8) for retirement and awarded the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) and an Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). No documentary evidence has been presented to substantiate...
AFBCMR 99-03048A INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Special Review Board and adopt that recommendation as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant and counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). Counsel’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
_________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 25 July 2000, the Board considered the application and found sufficient evidence to warrant her reevaluation by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) to determine her medical condition at the time of her release from active duty and transfer to the Arizona ANG (Exhibit A - D). A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The decisions of the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB), dated 29 Jan 98, and the decision of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAF/PC), dated 3 Apr 98, are contrary to law and regulation and violate “minimum concepts of basic fairness.” When all the evidence is considered, the Board should reach the decision that she is unfit for further military service and should be permanently retired, with...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 7 October 1999 and 26 September 2000. Applicant's response to the AFDRB is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Members of the Board Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Ms. Carolyn J. Watkins, Mr. John E. Pettit considered this application on 17 January 2001 in accordance with the...
The processing of a military member through the military disability evaluation system is determined by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) when the member is determined to be medically disqualified for continued military service. The Director of Personnel Program Management, ARPC/DPP, reviewed the case and states that to be eligible for Reserve retired pay under Title 10 USC, Section 12731 the applicant needs to complete at least 15 years, but less than 20 years of satisfactory service, with...