ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 91-02260
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE
On 31 May 1985, the Board considered and denied the applicant's request for
an upgrade of his discharge. A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings
is attached at Exhibit F.
On 25 September 2000, applicant submitted additional documentation and
requested reconsideration. (Exhibit G). On 26 October 2000, a post-
service letter was sent to the applicant asking him to provide additional
information pertaining to his activities since leaving the service.
(Exhibit H)
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, WV, indicated on the basis of the data furnished they were
unable to locate an arrest record (Exhibit I).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. After reviewing the previous
documentation and noting the additional documentation submitted, we again
are not convinced that the applicant’s request should be granted. We find
no impropriety in the characterization of applicant's discharge. It
appears that responsible officials applied appropriate standards in
effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that
pertinent regulations were violated or that applicant was not afforded all
the rights to which entitled at the time of discharge. We conclude,
therefore, that the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization
of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances. We also
find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge
be upgraded on the basis of clemency. We have considered applicant’s
overall quality of service, the events which precipitated the discharge,
and available evidence related to post-service activities and
accomplishments. On balance, we do not believe that clemency is warranted.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we again find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
DECISION OF THE BOARD:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the applicant
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 28 March 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Panel Chair
Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member
Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit G. ROP, dated 18 July 1994 w/atchs.
Exhibit H. Applicant's letter, dated 19 September 1994,
w/atchs.
Exhibit I. FBI Report.
DAVID C. VAN GASBECK
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1994-02615A
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1994-02615 INDEX CODE 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed. By application, dated 9 Dec 03, the applicant again requests his RE code be changed so that he may be allowed to reenlist. Therefore, the majority of the...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F. In a letter, dated 1 December 1997, the State of Department of Veterans Affairs, provided additional documentation and requested reconsideration of the applicant’s request for award of the PH (Exhibit G). A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F. In a letter, dated 25 June 1997, the State of of Veterans Affairs, requested reconsideration request for award of the PH (Exhibit G). ' Examiner's...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceeding is attached at Exhibit C. In support of his request for reconsideration, applicant provided a letter with attachments detailing his post-service activities (Exhibit D). _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 1 October 1952, he was honorably discharged and furnished a Honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00861
Based on the information and evidence provided, they recommend the applicant's request be denied (Exhibit D). Although the applicant has presented documented evidence of post- service activities and accomplishments, the Board majority believes that based on the severity of the drug abuse and the drug of choice (LSD), they find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. Therefore, it is my decision that his discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-02336A
The applicant submitted a statement and additional character reference statements which are attached at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice warranting an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge to general. _______________________________________________________________________ _____________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...
The applicant submitted a statement and additional character reference statements which are attached at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice warranting an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge to general. _______________________________________________________________________ _____________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...
Counsel’s complete reconsideration request is at Exhibit H. The ROP did reflect the correct date (21 March 1994) of the meeting with the rater, additional rater, the applicant and his wife in the Statement of Facts section, and also indicated in the summary of the legal evaluation that the pertinent date used in the AFLSA/JAJM advisory (21 May 1994) was incorrect. The applicant claimed no unauthorized disclosure of confidential information during the original inquiry and presented no...
Counsel’s complete reconsideration request is at Exhibit H. The ROP did reflect the correct date (21 March 1994) of the meeting with the rater, additional rater, the applicant and his wife in the Statement of Facts section, and also indicated in the summary of the legal evaluation that the pertinent date used in the AFLSA/JAJM advisory (21 May 1994) was incorrect. The applicant claimed no unauthorized disclosure of confidential information during the original inquiry and presented no...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-01581A
Counsel’s complete reconsideration request is at Exhibit H. The ROP did reflect the correct date (21 March 1994) of the meeting with the rater, additional rater, the applicant and his wife in the Statement of Facts section, and also indicated in the summary of the legal evaluation that the pertinent date used in the AFLSA/JAJM advisory (21 May 1994) was incorrect. The applicant claimed no unauthorized disclosure of confidential information during the original inquiry and presented no...
On 5 Sep 9 7 , the applicant provided documentation relating to her post-service activities and requested the Board reconsider her application (see Exhibit F). After reviewing the statements and accomplishments pertaining to her post-service conduct, and noting that she was issued an honorable discharge, we believe her RE code should be changed to \\RE 3A" in order that she may apply for enlistment in the Air Force Reserves. The following documentary evidence was considered: AFBCMR...