We noted the character references the applicant provided in support of his request and do not find them sufficient to warrant approval of the requested relief on the basis of clemency. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He requested that his child be enrolled in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) and was told by a Military Personnel Flight (MPF) representative that he needed to provide a DNA test to prove his paternity. In a North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, State Center for Health Statistics - N.C. Vital Records, Affidavit of Parentage for Child Born Out of Wedlock...
AF | BCMR | CY2001 | BC 2001 02811
STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 6 March 2002, the Board considered and denied the applicants request that his discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants separation and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F. In an application dated 20 June 2014, the applicant seeks reconsideration of his earlier request. THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2001 | BC-1996-01020A
In HQ USAF/JAG’s opinion, there is evidence to support the Board’s conclusion that a timely request for a deemed election of former spouse SBP coverage was never received from the applicant. The applicant claims she submitted a request for a deemed election of former spouse SBP coverage by certified mail on 27 July 1992. The applicant could also have established the former spouse SBP coverage for herself provided she submitted a copy of the divorce decree to DFAS and requested a deemed...
AF | BCMR | CY2001 | BC-1996-01731A
On 21 July 1998, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request to increase his disability rating from 40% to 100%. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s disability retirement, and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit H. On 12 July 2001, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration through his Congressman, contending that the Air Force did not take time to check his symptoms out...
AF | BCMR | CY2001 | BC-1996-01737A
The denial of reenlistment was supported by the record - the correction was not. Although approximately 80 members of applicant’s ANG unit were due to reenlist or extend shortly before or after he was denied reenlistment, only the records of five members who were denied reenlistment have been provided. Applicant’s counsel states the ANG failed to provide us all of the available records of individuals denied reenlistment.
AF | BCMR | CY2001 | BC-2001-00597-2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request for the award of the Purple Heart and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E. On 18 July 2012, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In earlier findings, the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2001 | BC-2001-01195
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit K (with Exhibit C). On 5 Feb 13, the applicant requested reconsideration to change his RE and SPD codes stating that his psychological health is being called into question. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board reconsidered AFBCMR Docket Number...
AF | BCMR | CY2001 | BC-2001-01568
The applicant was considered but not selected for promotion to lieutenant colonel by the CY99A promotion selection board. The applicant had sufficient time once the record was corrected to request his letter be withdrawn. _______________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 20 September 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Mr. Teddy L. Houston, Panel Chair Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr.,...
AF | BCMR | CY2001 | BC-2001-02086
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, the Board agrees with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force and adopts their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that...
AF | BCMR | CY2001 | BC-2002-01142A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01142 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests that his discharge documents be corrected to reflect that he was assigned to the --- th Fighter Squadron, ---th Fighter Group. On 10 Oct 48, he was discharged from...