Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 96-00884
Original file (96-00884.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                                 ADDENDUM TO


                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  96-00884
            INDEX NUMBER:  111.01

      XXXXXXXXXXXX     COUNSEL:  None

      XXX-XX-XXXX      HEARING DESIRED:  No

_______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) closing  1  June  1991,  1  June
1992, 1 June 1993, and 19 May 1994 be  removed  from  his  records  and
substituted with the reaccomplished reports; and, upon approval that he
be reconsidered  for  promotion  to  the  grade  of  major  by  Special
Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year (CY) 1995A  (5  June  1995)
Central Major Board.

_______________________________________________________________

RESUME OF CASE:

On 24 April 1997, the AFBCMR considered and  denied  applicant’s  above
request.  A complete copy of the Record of Proceeding  is  attached  at
Exhibit F.

In support of his request for  reconsideration,  applicant  provided  a
five-page statement that addresses the Board’s previous  conclusion,  a
copy of his previous case, and statements from two of  his  supervisors
at the time he was considered but not selected for promotion.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit G.

____________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of probable error  or  injustice.   After  reviewing  the  new
statements he has provided, we are  not  persuaded  that  the  contested
reports were in error or unjust.  Rather, the applicant makes more of  a
case that his OPRs could have been written differently to better  convey
his duty performance.  The Board believes that to change an OPR based on
the arguments put forth by the applicant is to endorse  a  system  where
the only justification needed for correction to an OPR is the lack of  a
desired outcome,  e.g.,  promotion.   The  Board  also  notes  that  the
applicant’s rater and additional raters on the  contested  reports  were
fairly senior in grade  and  should  have  had  adequate  experience  in
accomplishing performance evaluations.  Without a  basis  for  comparing
whether others evaluated by these individuals or assigned to like  units
were similarly impacted, it is not possible to draw the conclusion  that
the applicant makes.  In view of the above findings, we find  no  reason
to change the decision of the previous Board.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the  existence  of  probable  material  error  or  injustice;  that   the
application was denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following  members  of  the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 20 March 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair

      Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member

      Mr. Thomas J. Topolski, Jr., Member

The following additional documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit F.  Record of Proceeding, w/Exhibits, dated 20 Mar 98.
    Exhibit G.  Letter, Applicant, dated 3 Feb 01, w/atchs.




                                   RICHARD A. PETERSON
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00962

    Original file (BC-2003-00962.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00962 INDEX CODE: 131.00, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Reports (OPRs), closing 9 January 1999 and 9 January 2000, be replaced with the reaccomplished OPRs he has provided. In view of the foregoing, and in order to offset any possibility of an injustice,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01843

    Original file (BC-2003-01843.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    By amendment at Exhibit G, the promotion recommendation form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the CY01B Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board be removed from his records and replaced with a reaccomplished PRF containing definitely promote DP recommendation. On 16 October 2002, the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) denied applicant’s request to substitute the contested OPR and the PRF for the CY01B Central Selection Board. Their evaluation is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01894

    Original file (BC-2003-01894.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01894 (Case 2) INDEX CODE: 131.00, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Referral Officer Performance Report (OPR), rendered for the period 5 July 1990 through 4 January 1991, be declared void and removed from her records. Prior to the applicant’s break in service, during the period...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02859

    Original file (BC-2002-02859.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant asserts that while there is no requirement for rating chains to include PME or command comments, absence of these comments was intentionally made to exclude him from promotion. Further, he believes this alleged bias against him caused the rater and additional rater to omit PME and command recommendations on the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802642

    Original file (9802642.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After a review of his Officer Performance Report (OPR), for the period 2 July 1989 through 29 October 1989, he discovered an error in a statement cited in the CY96B PRF. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Acting Chief, Promotion, Evaluation, & Recognition Division, HQ AFPC/DPPPAB, states that while the applicant contends the statement in question may have misled the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01151

    Original file (BC-2002-01151.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS INDEX CODE 111.01 111.03 111.05 131.01 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-01151 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period closing 24 Oct 98 be declared void, the Performance Recommendation Form (PRF) for the Calendar Year 1999A (CY99A) Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9701857A1

    Original file (9701857A1.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-01857 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the CY97C Lieutenant Colonel Board, which convened on 21 Jul 97, be replaced with a reaccomplished PRF. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03054

    Original file (BC-2004-03054.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03054 INDEX NUMBER: 131.01; 111.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY03A (8 Jul 03) (P0503A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02373

    Original file (BC-2003-02373.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02373 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 19 September 2000 through 18 September 2001 be replaced with a reaccomplished OPR rendered for the same period and direct promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02014

    Original file (BC-2005-02014.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02014 INDEX CODE: 131.01 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 DEC 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by special selection board (SSB) for the CY04A Colonel Central Selection Board (6 Dec 04) (P0604A) with his...