RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-03124, Cse 2
INDEX CODE: 110.00
APPLICANT COUNSEL: NONE
SSN HEARING DESIRED: Yes
Applicant requests his General (Under Honorable Conditions) Discharge be
upgraded to an Honorable Discharge and the reason for separation be
changed. He also requests that he be credited for two years, five months
and twenty-two days of active duty military service. Applicant's
submission is at Exhibit A.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on
7 October 1999 and 26 September 2000. In accordance with policy, the
application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit
C). The AFDRB brief was forwarded to applicant for review and response
(Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the AFDRB is at Exhibit E.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to
warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory
opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been
rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied
rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the
existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issue(s) involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only
be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was
not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Ms. Carolyn J. Watkins, Mr.
John E. Pettit considered this application on
17 January 2001 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction
36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
TERRY A. YONKERS
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 7 October 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).) After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 8 October 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).) After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Available Master Personnel Records C. AFDRB Brief D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 9 March 1950 (Exhibit B). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
The AFDRB brief was forwarded to applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
On 25 March 1999, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied an application submitted by applicant requesting an upgrade of his discharge to honorable, a change of reason for discharge, and a change of his RE Code (See AFDRB Hearing Record at Exhibit C). A copy of the AFDRB Hearing Record was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient...
The Air Force Correction Board of Military Records (AFBCMR) denied applicant’s request for an upgrade of discharge on 25 March 1965. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant ' s request on 15 April 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.