_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: HQ AFPC did not have her Training Report (TR) filed in her selection folder in time for the start of the 1-8 December 1998 Colonel Promotion Board (0698C). If the training report (TR) was not received prior to the board reviewing the applicant’s below-the-zone record, it would not have been date-stamped and filed until after the board concluded. We noted that HQ AFPC/DPPPA reconfirmed the dates on...
d. The referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered on him for the period 18 Dec 93 through 17 Dec 94. e. The memorandum from his commander, dated 11 May 95, that established a Special Security File (SSF) on him. f. Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 2 Nov 95. g. The referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered on him for the period 18 Dec 94 through 17 Dec 95. h. Letter of Reprimand, dated 28 Mar 97. i. The Air Force contends that the applicant has no evidence that the adverse...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00095 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted a terminal leave promotion to the grade of captain. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Officer Promotion Section, AFPC/DPPPO, reviewed the applicant’s request and recommended...
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00105 (Case 2) COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: A waiver be granted for an exception to policy for retirement under the Fiscal Year 2000/2001 (FY00/01) Phase III Officer Early Retirement Program. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In letters, dated 16 May and 27 July 2001, the applicant’s Senator provided copies of correspondence provided to him by the applicant and her counsel (Exhibits J and M). In further support of the appeal, counsel submits the 6 August 1982 version of the Air Force regulations governing crew rest and flight duty limitations....
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00325 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect the award of the Purple Heart, Air Medal, Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal with bronze star, and the Republic of Korean War Service Medal. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
The determinative issue is solely whether Air Force counsel can prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that my client stated his sexual orientation for the specific purpose of seeking separation from the Air Force. The Air Force Judge Advocate General (JAG) agrees with the argument advanced by the applicant in the Reply Brief of 30 Sep 00 that the Board could only require recoupment of AFHPSP funds if it found that the applicant made his statement of homosexual orientation for...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The applicant listed his sexual orientation in direct response to a question on a medical questionnaire that he was required to complete for a pre-commissioning physical. Taken to its logical extent, the Advisory Opinion’s interpretation of “voluntariness” or purpose produces the following result: (1) A servicemember should know, on the basis of his HPSP contract, that every statement of homosexual conduct may result in discharge; (2) Purpose can be inferred where a person takes an action...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Chief, Officer Promotion & Appointment Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPPO, recommended that, since the applicant is not eligible for active duty promotions, he remain on the RASL and be eligible to compete for Reserve promotion boards. It is further recommended that, if he is not selected by the FY00 board, he be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by SSB for any subsequent Air Force Reserve selection boards for which he may have been...
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement (undated), a letter from a lawyer; documentation associated with his administrative discharge, which included a SF Form 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 10 April 1998, and a Mental Health Evaluation, dated 23 Jul 98; and copies of letters of admission from two universities. The reason for the proposed action was that applicant failed to indicate on his SF 93 [Report of Medical History] that he had been diagnosed...
In support of the application, the applicant provides personal statements, a copies of his discharge document and his enlisted duty record, and excerpts from a periodical named Stormy Weather (Exhibit A). The absence of any information pertaining to the asserted wounds from the existing records is not surprising in view of the confusion that may have existed on the day of the raid in treating many of those badly wounded. JOSEPH G. DIAMOND Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-00616 MEMORANDUM FOR THE...
After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his records should be changed. Applicant has provided no persuasive evidence that his prior to service medical condition was improperly rated and processed at the time of his discharge. We therefore agree with the recommendations of the Air Force and adopt the rational expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has suffered...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 27 February 2001. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Board further concluded that the applicant’s misconduct was mitigated by the number and nature of the personal problems he appeared to be facing and recommended that he be discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of discharge on 9 June 2000. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00747 INDEX CODE: 108.05 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive pay for the 6 years she spent on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) from 6 Jun 91 through 4 Jun 97; that her TDRL pay be non-taxable; she receive continued disability (incapacitation) pay; and, her records be...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated the applicant's requests and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge (Exhibit D). The decision of the AFDRB appears to be based on the evidence of record and has not been adequately rebutted by the applicant.
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Available documentation indicated that the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 2 Dec 88 in the grade of airman for a period of six years. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s staff request, the Directorate of Military Law, AFRC/JAJM, reviewed this application and recommended denial. JAJM indicated that the...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Available documentation indicated that the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 2 Dec 88 in the grade of airman for a period of six years. Applicant’s additional submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit M. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In an earlier finding, we determined that there was insufficient evidence to warrant any...
_________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT are corrected to show that on 13 June 1957, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). Record of Proceedings, dated 16 January 2001, with exhibits. Exhibit B. Applicant’s undated letter, postmarked 4 Apr 01, with attachments VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair AFBCMR...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 00-00868 INDEX CODE 100.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The military records be changed to show a name and gender of “Holly E.” and “female” rather than “Stephen R.” and “male.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Department of the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00882 INDEX CODE: 137.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he notified the finance center immediately following his divorce to suspend his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) premiums. In view of the fact that finance center suspended his spouse coverage back to the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00930 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant's request to upgrade his discharge to honorable, change the reason for...
The Administrative Discharge Board (i.e., AFR 36-2) action be set aside and removed from his records. However, the Board did recommend that, if possible, the applicant be appointed in the Air Force Reserve for the purpose of serving in the Georgia ANG. In an application, dated 27 February 2000, the applicant, through counsel, provided additional documentation, requested reconsideration of his application, and amended his request to include setting aside and expunging the AFR 36-2 discharge...
On 22 Jan 01, he was considered and not selected by SSB for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel for the CY99B board. Critical acquisition positions are selected positions that must be filled by members of the Acquisition Corps (see Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded and states that DPPPO is correct in their statement that he did not write a letter to the P0599B board...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant, a member of the Air Force Reserve, was processed through the Disability Evaluation System (DES) when her disability case was referred to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) in December 1999, for a diagnosis of dysthymic disorder. Counsel provided a statement supporting the applicant’s requests to change the IG findings; credit satisfactory service to 20 plus years; change the AF...
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The duty qualification brief that appeared before the 1999 Brigadier General Promotion Board lacked relevant information for duty title, academic education, professional military education and decorations. Subsequent to the board he was informed by Air Force Personnel Center there was no information on file regarding his academic education. After thoroughly reviewing the complete case file, the...
The Board recommended discharge from the service because of unfitness, with an undesirable discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 15 Feb 01, the Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed the application and states that the applicant did not provide evidence of errors...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated the request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit G). The applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit I.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F. In a letter, dated 20 April 2001, the applicant provided statements from her former rating chain and requests reconsideration of her appeal. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the additional documentation provided by the applicant, the majority of the Board finds sufficient evidence to award her the AFCM. WAYNE R. GRACIE Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-01071 INDEX CODE: 107.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
A member must provide documentation to support the injury was a direct result of enemy action. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart for injuries he received in action against an enemy of the United States during a bombing in the Republic of Vietnam on 26 June 1968. GREGORY H. PETKOFF Panel...
He was honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserve on 26 May 66. A complete copy of the advisory is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force Evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D).
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01128 INDEX CODE: 128.09 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed in full for self-procured airline ticket cost from her technical training base located in San Antonio, Texas, to her new duty assignment in Great Falls, Montana. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01140 INDEX NUMBER: 137.01; 128.14 (DECEASED) COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES Applicant requests that his deceased father’s records be corrected to show that the deceased’s widow is entitled to an annuity under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01215 INDEX CODE: 128.09 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed $615 for the cost of self-procuring a commercial airline ticket to her new duty station. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Officer Evaluation Board Section, HQ AFPC/DPPPEB, reviewed this application and states in order for the applicant to receive a Definitely Promote (DP) recommendation on his PRF that was previously corrected, he would again need the senior rater and the Management Level Review (MLR) President's support. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01266 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES Applicant requests that his commander’s denial of his reenlistment be overturned and that he be allowed to reenlist in the Air Force Reserve. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01271 INDEX NUMBER: 111.02; 126.02; 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs), rendered for the periods 21 October 1997 through 20 October 1998, and 21 October 1998 through 31 May 1999, be declared void and removed from his records; he be made eligible for...
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01271A INDEX NUMBER: 108.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests early retirement. Based on the Board’s findings in a previous application, the Board recommended that the applicant be reinstated to active duty. GREGORY H....
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01281 INDEX CODES: 110.00, 111.02, 131.00 COUNSEL: GEORGE E. DAY HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The forged Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) be removed from his promotion file and he be given Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration. ...