t DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC SEQ f 5 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-00957 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: with Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree e the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rational has expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant been the victim of either an error or an injustice. There fore, t's under the authority delegated in A.FI 36-26503, the...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: 067 2 9 I998 DOCKET NUMBER: 9 8 - 0 0 9 7 6 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REO UESTS THAT: His discharge be characterized as honorable and the narrative reason for his separation be changed. I+ AIR FO RCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, reviewed this application and states that in order to correct an injustice of improperly labeling the applicant's disorder, the...
In his opinion, the applicant’s request for removal of the contested reports should be accomplished to correct an injustice of circumstances (Exhibit C). The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, stated that the first time the contested reports were considered in the promotion process was Cycle 96E7 to master sergeant (E-7), promotions effective Aug 96 - Jul 97. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 17 Jun 98.
Applicant's submission is at, Exhibit AL The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's. Second Oak: Leaf Cluster to the Meritorious Service Medal, and her DD Form 214 has been corrected to reflect this. - We recommend disapproval of the applicant's request to be: awarded the Armed Forces » Service Medal.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-00986 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent militarv records of the DeDartment of the Air I be corrected to...
-- AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DP, reviewed the application and states that in early October 1992, the Nonaffiliated Reserve Section after being tr (NARS) from the National Guard, applicant applied dual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) and was approve program assignment. However, when the process of reassignment started, there was a four-month delay causing the applicant's inability to perform in his unit and earn the required number of retirement...
Applicant's submission is at The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR Z O R R 2 C T I O N OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF FRCCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER : 9 8 -- 0 0 9 9 6 CCUNSEL : None HEARING DESIRED: I'Jo Applicant requests that his genera;, under honorah1 e conditions, discharge be upgraded to honorable. T h e appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the applicati-on be denied (Exhibit B , I . Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01005 INDEX CODE 131.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) for the 2 October 1996 entry on the Officer Selection Brief (OSB) reviewed by the Calendar Year 1997C (CY97C) Lieutenant Colonel Board be changed to...
RECOMMENDATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that, in order to correct an injustice of improperly labeling the applicant’s disorder, the applicant’s request for change of reason for discharge be granted. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant also recommends applicant’s narrative reason for separation be change since his medical condition was not a personality disorder. We concur with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s recommendation that his narrative reason for separation should be...
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: tary records of the Department of the Air Force relating t be corrected to show that, in conjunction with her entry was issued a reenlistment eligibility code of “X,” rather than...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01 024 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: E cords of the Department of the Air Force relatin , be corrected to show that on 9...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. E. Applicant's Response SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . Unfortunately, the AF Form 41 8 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. However, if the decision is to grant the relief sought, applicant’s record should be corrected to reflect his RE code as “3K: Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records...
The applicant voluntarily requested early separation from the Air Force by submitting an AF Form 3 1 which indicated her reason for requesting early separation was miscellaneous reason. However, with the applicant’s desire to separate 01 Jan 98 (as indicated in her application), she still would not have been eligible for a separation “to attend school” because her normal expiration term of service (ETS) was 980328, more than 90 days allowed by Air Force Instructions. The Air Force approved...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS FEB 2 4 1999 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01053 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REUUESTS THAT: His duty history include a Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) of 11X1115M,11 as reflected on the Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 1 May 1990, and a duty title of 'ISquadron Safety Officer/' effective 2 May 1989. His duty history had been administratively corrected in time so that the Officer...
Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. E. F. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions Addendum to Air Force Advisory Opinion AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S A I R F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H A I R F O R C E E A S E T E X A S MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR 12 Jun 98 FROM: HQ AFPCDPPPEP 550 C Street West Ste 07 Randolph AFB TX 78 150-4709 SUB cords (DD Form 149) REQUESTED ACTION:...
STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the Brief prepared by an Examiner for the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) (Exhibit C). applicant's discharge. Considered alone, we the conclude and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 31 March 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). 4 After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Enlisted Promotion & Military Testing Branch, AFPC/DPPPWB, provided comments addressing supplemental promotion consideration. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant provided a supporting statement from his commander, who is also the indorser on the proposed reaccomplished...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AUG 1 4 1998 IN THE MATTER OF: . In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
Given the date of the discharge applicant claims to have relied on, he could not, in good faith, have honestly believed that the Air Force had discharged him from active duty. Applicant's request to have his discharge upgraded to general (under honorable conditions) was considered; however, in view of the fact that he only served 90 days on active duty, and based on current standards he most likely would have received an entry level separation, we do not believe that his discharge should...
Restore 2 days charged leave for 25-26 Mar 98. When she reported in at the military personnel flight, finance allowed 3 days travel time 27 - 29 Mar 98 and charged 2 days leave, 25- 26 Mar 98. In this case, we support granting relief because the Air Force should not penalize the applicant for erroneous information received at the orderly room.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. 6 DEC IO 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 109 1 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36- 2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: of the Department of the Air Force relating to be corrected to show that on 2...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 1 104 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: Larch 1998; and competent authority approved his DD Form 2278, Application for Do-It-Yourself P I T Y ) Move and Counseling Checklist, dated...
the one he was under while assigned to Osan AB, Korea. This caused By way of backgro currencies in several major problems for many military members serving in these areas who were living on the economy and had either received OHA advances to pay their rent up front; or had leases written in U.S. My point of contact for this advisory is Capt McLoud, DSN 227-0682. quest and change his records to eimbursement at the higher , Chief, Legislation & Compensation Division Directorate of Personnel...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). Applicant states he understood he would be on convalescent leave during this time. Applicant was on leave en route between assignment from Leave history shows 8 days charged leave 1 Jun - 8 Jun AFB to days c o n s n t leave 14 - 20 Jun 97, and 39 days charged leave 21 Jun - 29 Jul AFB hospital on 9 Jun due to acute low back 97.
APPLICANT S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION : Applicant states, in part, that the facts in his case are not in dispute. In recommending denial of the application, HQ AFPC/DPPRS notes, among other things, that the applicant asserts that the MPF at Travis AFB did not inform him that he would incur a five-year ADSC for the KC-10 IQT. This R I P clearly states the ADSC he incurred for KC-10 IQT as f i v e 3 AFBCMR 98-01 125 .
On 8 Feb 00, the applicant provided a four-page statement and requested the Board reconsider removal of the APR closing 7 Mar 89 from his records and grant him immediate promotion to the grade of chief master sergeant (see Exhibit J). The applicant is requesting the AFBCMR void his Airman Performance Report (APRs) closing 16 May 88 and 7 Mar 89. Based on the evidence provided, our recommendations are appropriate.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01127 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be changed to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. RITA S. LOONEY Panel Chair 15 SEP 1998 MEMORANDUMFORAFBCMR FROM: AFLSA/JAJM 112 Luke...
Applicant states he lost leave because his residency program prevented him from taking normal leave. Therefore, he had 79 days on 1 Oct 96, used 13 days, and had 96 days as of 30 Sep 97. He requests reinstatement of lost leave based on AFBCMR’s rationale for restoring 19 days on 3 Jul97.
3 AFBCMR 96- 01136 Therefore, if the AFBCMR overturns his court-martial action, he would only be entitled to have his former grade of airman reinstated with an effective date and date of rank of 3 May 72. Concerning the applicant's request that his court- martial conviction be overturned, we note that 10 USC 1552(f) limits this Board to correction of a record to reflect actions taken by the reviewing official and action on the sentence of a court-martial for the purpose of clemency. ...
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D) .
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AUG 1 4 1996 . IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-01141 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to general. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: - The AFBCMR Chief Medical Consultant reviewed this application and is of the opinion that no change In the records is warranted and the application should be d e n i m . *at Based on the medical evidence provided, the IPEB found her condition nad stabilized and recommended thar she be removed from the TDRL and permanently retired w i t h a 40% disability rating. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated Exhibit D .
Both must be exercised within the first year following divorce: the retiree may file an election change, or the former spouse may request the retiree be deemed to have made such a change on his or her behalf. If neither the member nor former spouse requests the election change within the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. There is no evidence the decedent nor the applicant took the required action to change the coverage, and SBP premiums...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as. - Panel Chaif Attachment: Ltr, HQ USAF/DPRC, 27 May 1998, w/Atch DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 27 May 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ USAFDPRC 1040 Air Force Pentagon Washington DC 20330- 1040 SUBJECT: ction of Military Records This responds to a request for a BCMR advisory o his records be changed to show he was due...
She requested separation for pregnancy and was separated on 03 Jan 98, an arbitrary date. Her separation date was 8 days before she would have been eligible for the MGIB. AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ USAFDPPE 1040 Air Force Pentagon Washington, D.C. 20330-1040 I Bill Eligibility 0 6 AUG 1998 1 9 4 7 - 1 9 9 7 Public Law 98-525, the legislation which enacted the Montgomery GI Bill, requires that individuals who first became...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-01156 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Dpoc16W Applicant requests that his mandatory separation date (MSD) of 1 December 1999 be adjusted to 1 December 2003 to allow for time he was assigned to the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . FACTS: The applicant states that his discharge would not have occurred had it not been for a report filed by a psychologist who evaluated him by direction of his commander. Applicant did not identify any specific errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts which warrant an upgrade of the discharge he received, change his...
He was honorably discharged on 1 April 1998 and reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 April 1998 for a period of three ( 3 ) years; and, at the time of his reenlistment on 2 April 1998, he was entitled to a zone B, multiple one-half Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) , with obligated service through 20 August 1998. L/ Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Jut 0 6 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01165 MEMORANDUM OF...
They recommend- A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C request be denied. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded that the award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), for the period 30 June 1993 to Officer Selection 15 September 1995, should be reflected on Brief (OSB) and the citation be placed in Officer Selection Record (OSR) and, that he should be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by special...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01176 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent Force relating to show that on 31 D 1 period of two (2) years. ...
Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFRES/RSOO, dtd Jul 1, 1998, w/Atch -*ne1 Chair/ DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01178 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1 5 5 2 , Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The...
Applicant did not submit evidence or identify any errors in the discharge process or provide facts which warrant an upgrade of the discharge he received. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and states that he had a behavioral problem that resulted in him being sent for a psychiatric evaluation. The officer that evaluated him concluded that he had a mental health problem and...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01185 SEP 2 9 1998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES Applicant requests that (1) her Calendar Year 1998 (CY981 Lieutenant Colonel, Nurse Corp, Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) be replaced with a new PRF and (2) she be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY98 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. The appropriate Air...
He received an approved Career Job Reservation (CJR) in Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 3EOX2, with no Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB); and, he was honorably discharged effective 16 November 1997 and, on 1 7 November 1997, he reenlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of 4 years. Ltr, AFPC/DPPRS, dtd Jul 2 1 , 1998 D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E AIR FORCE H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE E A S E TEXAS 2 2 JUN 1998 MEMORANDUM...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC JUN 3 0 l998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01195 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to that one (1) day commencing 2 October...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC AUG 2 5 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01209 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: the Department of the Air Force relating to orrected to show...