Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801031
Original file (9801031.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AUG  1 4  1998 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

DOCKET "MBER:  98-01031 
COUNSEL:  NONE 

HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

Applicant  requests his  27  March  1990  uncharacterized  entry  level 
separation  be  changed  to  an  honorable  discharge.  Applicant's 
submission is at Exhibit A. 

The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and 
provided  an  advisory  opinion  to  the  Board  recommending  the 
application  be  denied  (Exhibit  C) . 
The  advisory  opinion  was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response  (Exhibit D).  As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office. 
After  careful  consideration  of' applicant's  request  and  the 
available  evidence  of  record, we  find  insufficient  evidence  of 
error  or  injustice  to  warrant  corrective  action.  The  facts  and 
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the 
evidence  of  record  and  have  not  been  adequately  rebutted  by 
applicant.  There is no evidence in either the personnel records or 
the  medical  records  substantiating  applicant's  assertions  of 
physical  mistreatment  nor  has  any  evidence  been  provided  by  the 
applicant.  Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights 
to  which  entitled, appropriate regulations were  not  followed, or 
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb 
the existing record. 

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. 

The Board  staff is directed to inform applicant of  this decision. 
Applicant  should also be  informed that this decision is final and 
will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  presentation  of  new  relevant 
evidence  which  was  not  reasonably  availzle  at  the  time  the 
application was filed. 

Members of the Board, Messrs. Douglas J. Heady, Joseph G. Diamond, 
and Henry Romo Jr., considered this application on 11 August  1998, 
in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603 
and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552. 

DOUGLAS J. H E ~ Y  
Panel Chair 

Exhibits: 
A.  Applicant's DD Form 149 
B.  Available Master Personnel Records 
C.  Advisory Opinion 
D. 
E.  Applicant's Response 

SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802928

    Original file (9802928.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02928 INDEX CODE: 121.03 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes Applicant requests thirteen (13) days of leave be restored to his current leave balance. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702008

    Original file (9702008.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFBCMR previously considered and denied the applicant I s request that his records be corrected to reflect the addition of an Oak Leaf Cluster to the AM and DFC (see AFBCMR 80- 00947, with Exhibits A through C) . The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant I s requests and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the applicant's requests be denied (Exhibit E). Concerning his request for award of the China War Memorial Medal, the facts and opinions stated in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800883

    Original file (9800883.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force off ice evaluated applicant I s request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). .” Another states “I know that I can reenlist rather than extend, but I have elected to execute this extension instead of reenlisting.” Both of these statements clearly indicate the applicant was aware of the reenlistment options.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800061

    Original file (9800061.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The applicant voluntarily requested early separation from the Air Force for miscellaneous reasons and the request was approved for his separation to be effective 06 Aug 97.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800491

    Original file (9800491.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900261

    Original file (9900261.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900717

    Original file (9900717.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9901081

    Original file (9901081.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802774

    Original file (9802774.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802106

    Original file (9802106.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.