8
I
.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AUG 1 4 1998
IN THE MATTER OF:
.
1_1____
DOCKET NUMBER: 9 8 - 0 1 0 7 8
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests his general discharge be upgraded to
honorable. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant I s
request to have his general discharge upgraded to honorable on
3 April 1 9 9 8 .
In accordance with policy, the application was
forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C).
The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and
response (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the AFDRB brief appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by
applicant/counsel. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was
denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no
basis to disturb the existing record'.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Michael P. Higgins, Dr. Gerald B.
Kauvar, and Mr. Allen Beckett considered this application on
2 8 July 1 9 9 8 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and the governing statut
--
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records .
C. AFDRB Brief
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 15 July 1998. The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant ' s request 2nd the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The AFDRB brief response (Exhibit Board (AFDRB) denied applicant I s In accordance with policy, the .s Board for further consideration was forwarded to applicant for D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for - review and response (Exhibit D) . After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. the Board Mrs. Barbara A .
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant s request on 2 6 October 1998. In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C ) . The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant I s request on 17 July 1998 (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant I s request on 17 July 1998 (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Appiicantls submission is at Exhibit A. * The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant Is request that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to either general (under honorable conditions) or honorable on 26 September 1 9 8 5 (Exhibit C). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 8 October 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).) After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.