AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MV 1 3 w98
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NO: 98-01034
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of
2X be changed to allow eligibility to enlist in the Air National
Guard. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C ) .
The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D ) .
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
of this decision.
The Board staff is directed to inform aDDlicant
Applicant should also be informed that this dec sion is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Ms. Rita S. Looney, Mr. Steven A. Shaw, and
Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler considered this application on 3 November
1998 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction
36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U H .
1552.
Panel Chair
IY
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R FORCE
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS
2 0 MAY ma
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPCDPPAE
550 C Street West Ste 10
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4712
The applicant requests his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code changed to a favorable
code so that he may enlist in the Air National Guard. He filed a timely request within three years
of discovering alleged error.
The applicant was discharged on 14 Dec 97 with an honorable characterization of
service after serving sixteen years, five months, and 17 days active and inactive service. He
received an RE code of “2X: First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not
selected for reenlistment under the SRP.”
SRP consideration is normally documented on an AF Form 418. Unfortunately, the
AF Form 41 8 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record.
However, we did confirm applicant’s RE code “2X” on a 3 1 Mar 98 “Project Capture” listing.
Also, a review of his record of performance reflects EPR ratings of “3” and “2” on his last two
reports. This supports a recommendation of denial of reenlistment.
Considering the above, we recommend denial of applicant’s request for correction of
RE code. However, if the decision is to grant the relief sought, applicant’s record should be
corrected to reflect his RE code as “3K: Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board
for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other reenlistment eligibility code
applies or is appropriate.” &-
. RAMLOGAN, C
Chief, Skills Manag
Dir of Personnel
, USAF
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant signed the form on 22 Sep 94, indicating his acknowledgment of nonselection and his intent to appeal the decision.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. code be The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. Based on the above, we recommend denial of applicant’s request for correction of RE code.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Based on the above, we recommend denial of applicant’s request for correction of RE code.
* AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01319 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and separation program designator (SPD) code be changed so that he may reenter the Air Force. After 7 years of service, he was honorably discharged from the Army Guard on 14 November 1 9 9 7 with a r l l l l RE code. A copy of the complete Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...
Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 16 Oct 98, w/atchs; Letter, dated 2 Oct 98; Statement BARBARA A. WESTGATE Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-00035 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-00114 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES AU9 r-1 898 Applicant requests that his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be deleted. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions E. Applicant’s Response D E P A R T M E N T OF T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS AUG 3 11998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01528 INDEX CODE: 100 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2C” on the DD Form 214, “Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty,” be changed to “1J” to allow enlistment into the Hawaii Air National Guard. We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. Applicant did not identifjl any specific errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts which warrant a change in the...