.
-
"
,
* .
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01043 -**pj f3 19%
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
1% '\
Applicant requests that the narrative reason for separation, issued
in conjunction with her 22 December 1997 discharge, be changed from
Applicant I s
I'Miscellaneous/General Reasons" to "To Attend School. I'
submission is at Exhibit A .
The Lppropriate Air Force off ices evaluated applicant I s request and
provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). As
of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant. Absent
persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled,
appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards
were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant 'of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
' evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board, Messrs. David C. Van Gasbeck, Richard A.
Peterson, and Jackson A . Hauslein, considered this application on
20 October 1998 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute, 1 0 U.S.C. 1552.
p
a
i
r
Exhibits:
A . Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinions
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS
MAY 0 7 1998
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPRS
550 C Street West Ste 11
Randolph AFB TX 78 150-47 13
SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military R
o
d
c
e
!
r
Y
The applicant, while serving in the grade of senior airman, was separated from the Air Force 22
Dec 97 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Voluntary-Miscellaneous Reasons) with an
Honorable discharge. She served 03 years, 08 months 24 days total active service.
Requested Action. The applicant is requesting the separation reason be changed fiom
“miscellaneous/general reasons” to “attend school.”
Facts. The applicant voluntarily requested early separation from the Air Force by submitting an
AF Form 3 1 which indicated her reason for requesting early separation was miscellaneous reason.
Her application was submitted according to AFI-36-3208, paragraph 3.15 which is the provision
for a miscellaneous/general reasons separation. In order for her to be eligible for early separation
to attend school her request would have had to be submitted according to paragraph 3.8 of AFI
36-3208 which requires that usually, the date of separation not be more than 10 days before the
class start date. In addition, applicants must show they have been accepted for a hll-time course
of instructions in a recognized Institution of higher education or vocational or technical school.
There is no evidence that the applicant submitted the required information and supporting .
documents therefore, her only option, was to submit the miscellaneous/general reasons request
which she submitted on 22 Jul97 with a requested separation date of 22 Dec 97. The Unit
Commander did indicate in her endorsement to the application that applicant desires to enter
nursing program in the fall 1998 and must complete certain pre-requisite courses prior to this.
The commander hrther indicated she had been accepted to a university as a pre-major student in
the College of Nursing for the 14 Jan 98 spring term. However, with the applicant’s desire to
separate 01 Jan 98 (as indicated in her application), she still would not have been eligible for a
separation “to attend school” because her normal expiration term of service (ETS) was 980328,
more than 90 days allowed by Air Force Instructions. The request was approved for her
separation to be effective 22 Dec 97. The Air Force approved just what she ask for at the time of
her application. The reason given in the majority of applications submitted for early released from
active duty under the miscellaneous separation provision is to attend school.
Discussion. This case has been reviewed for separation processing and there are no errors or
irregularities causing an injustice to the applicant. Her discharge complies with directives in effect
at the time of her discharge. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and
appropriate action was taken. She was not eligible to separate early to attend school because of
her requested date of separation was more than 90 days from her ETS and her only option was to
separate for miscellaneous reason.
Recommendation. Applicant did not identifjl any specific errors in the discharge processing nor
provide statements that indicate she was provided erroneous information during her separation
application which warrant a change in the separation reason. Accordingly, we recommend
applicant’s request be denied. However, if the decision is to grant the relief sought, the records
should be corrected to show SPD “MCF” and a reason for separation as “To Attend School.”
She has filed a timely request.
..
JOHN C. WOOTEN, GS-9
Military Personnel Mgmt Spec
Separations Branch
Dir of Personnel Program Management
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
17 July 1998
MEMORANDUM FOR SAFBCMR
FROM: HQ AF/DPRCL
1040 Air Force Pentagon
Washington, DC 20330-1040 *-
SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Recor
The attached file is forwarded to you for final action. Our office has primary
responsibility for establishing Air Force policy on unemployment compensation for ex-
servicemembers (UCX). We interpret the law and determine which separation narratives fall
within the statutory eligibility criteria.
Title 5, United States Code, is the legal basis for Air Force policy. It establishes basic
UCX eligibility by providing conditions of separation that would qualify for unemployment
compensation. Members who separate without completing their first full term must have
separated for convenience of the government under an early release program; hardship; medical
disqualification, service incurred injury/disability, parenthood or pregnancy; or inaptitude or
personality disorder. The Air Force determines which separation narratives would qualify for
UCX under these criterion.-separation
unemployment benefits.
narrative is not among those that qualify for
separation narrative, as validated by AFPC was “Miscellaneous Reasons.”
As such, the separation narrative is not among those making an ex-servicemember eligible for
UCX. We do not have authority to recommend approval or disapproval of a request to change a
narrative reason for separation. If the board elects to change the member’s separation reason and
questions arise concerning the UCX eligibility of the proposed new separation narrative, we will
advise the board on the UCX status of the proposed narrative.
EUGENE f. McGRATH, Major, USAF
Chief, Special & Incentive Pay Policy
Directorate of Personnel Resources Division
695-0060
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The applicant voluntarily requested early separation from the Air Force for miscellaneous reasons and the request was approved for his separation to be effective 06 Aug 97.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . No other characterization of service is possible under law for service members separated within the first 6 months of entry. Applicant served only 20 days and therefore, the uncharacterized discharge is correct and in accordance with Department of Defense and Air Force directives.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01763
Separations from the Air Force based on those reasons would be detailed on the DD Form 214 as reasons for separation, and for ex-service-members who did not complete their first full term of service, a “Miscellaneous” separation generally would not serve as an exception for qualifying for UCX. Had she realized the importance of the narrative reason for discharge, she would have filed for early separation with her main reason, that being education. In order to provide the relief she seeks,...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions D E P A R T M E N T OF THE A I R FORCE HEADQUARTERS.. AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR ~ FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPRS 550 C Street West Ste 1 1 Randolph AFB TX 781 50-4713 ;JuN 2 4 398 The...
She requested separation for pregnancy and was separated on 03 Jan 98, an arbitrary date. Her separation date was 8 days before she would have been eligible for the MGIB. AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ USAFDPPE 1040 Air Force Pentagon Washington, D.C. 20330-1040 I Bill Eligibility 0 6 AUG 1998 1 9 4 7 - 1 9 9 7 Public Law 98-525, the legislation which enacted the Montgomery GI Bill, requires that individuals who first became...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant’s request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02531 INDEX CODE: 100, 100.03 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for her separation on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be changed from Miscellaneous/General Reasons to financial hardship and that her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be...
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00073
The applicant feels that since the Air Force would not let her complete her initial enlistment without extending to be retrained, the reason for discharge should be changed to convenience of the government. The Board reviewed the record to find that the applicant had received an Honorable discharge and at her request her commander had allowed her to remain in the Air Force an additional 10 months from her notification of retraining. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR...
She applies now to change the reason for discharge “from personality disorder” to “adjustment disorder.” FACTS: Early in basic military training the applicant was evaluated by the mental health section of Wilford Hall Medical Center with a resulting diagnosis of “Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood DSM-IV Code 309.0.” Details of the evaluation are missing from the records, but the condition is noted on the letter of notification to the applicant that she was being recommended for...