Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801141
Original file (9801141.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AUG  1 4  1996 

. 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

DOCKET NO:  98-01141 

COUNSEL:  None 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

Applicant  requests  his  bad  conduct  discharge  be  upgraded  to 
general. 

Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. 

The facts surrounding his separation from the Air Force are unknown 
inasmuch as no military records were available. 
After  careful  consideration  of  applicant's  request,  we  found 
insufficient relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to  demonstrate 
the  existence  of  probable  error  or  injustice.  Based  upon  the 
presumption of  regularity  in the  conduct of  governmental affairs 
and  without  evidence  to  the  contrary, we  must  assume  that  the 
applicant's discharge was proper and in compliance with appropriate 
directives.  Therefore, we  find no basis upon which to  favorably 
consider this application. 
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. 
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision. 
Applicant should also be  informed that this decision is final and 
will  only be  reconsidered upon  the presentation  of  new  relevant 
evidence  which  was  not  reasonably  available  at  the  time  the 
application was filed. 

Members of the Board Ms. Martha Maust, Mr. Richard A. Peterson, and 
Mr.  Patrick  R. Wheeler,  considered this  application on  4 August 
1998  in  accordance with  the  provisions  of  Air  Force  Instruction 
36-2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. --  1552. 

MAdiTHA MAUST ' 

Panel Chair 

Exhibit : 
A.  Applicant's DD Form 149 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800447

    Original file (9800447.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The applicant’s responses are at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9800447

    Original file (9800447.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The applicant’s responses are at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00447

    Original file (BC-1998-00447.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The applicant’s responses are at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900035

    Original file (9900035.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 16 September 1996. In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801786

    Original file (9801786.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702245

    Original file (9702245.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge and changed of reason for discharge (Exhibit C). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request for change of his RE Code and provided an advisory opinion to the Board (Exhibit D). The decision of the AFDRB appears to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1997 | 9702245

    Original file (9702245.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge and changed of reason for discharge (Exhibit C). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request for change of his RE Code and provided an advisory opinion to the Board (Exhibit D). The decision of the AFDRB appears to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9803059

    Original file (9803059.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702463

    Original file (9702463.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force off ice evaluated applicant s request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9602041

    Original file (9602041.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted by applicant. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.