On 11 Jun 58, the applicant's commander requested that he be separated from the Air Force with an undesirable discharge. The records also indicated that the applicant was court-martialed and found guilty of only one of the two specifications and charges. DPPRS stated that the applicant did not submit evidence or identify any errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts which would warrant an upgrade of the discharge he received almost 40 years ago.
Attachment: Ltr, HQ USAF/DPRC, dtd 27 May 1998, w/Atch Panel Chair 4 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC - 1040 Air Force Pentagon Washington DC 20330-1 040 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ USAF/DPRC 27 May 1998 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records-- This responds to a request for a BCMR advisory o records be changed to show he was due reimbursement ho is requesfing his allowance rent, higher, OHA rate ceiling than the one he was...
DPPPA stated each officer eligible for promotion consideration by the CY97C board received an officer preselection brief (OPB) several months prior to the date the board convened in July 1997. It was the applicant’s responsibility to have the erroneous information corrected prior to the board or, as a minimum, to notify the Board of the erroneous duty titles on his OSB by letter prior to the board if he believed it important to his promotion consideration. Several months prior to the...
These decorations were reflected on the Senior NCO- Evaluation Brief and the Evaluation Board reviewed the applicant's records and assigned the 390.00 board score with full knowledge of the decorations. A complete copy of the DPPPWB evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response, the applicant indicated the decoration citations are placed in selection folders so that the board members can review them.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). T h e advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AUG 2 8 1998 AFBCMR 98-01227 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF 'I Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that on 20 N Overseas Housing...
He was honorably discharged on 1 April 1998, and reeenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 April 1998, of four (4) years with entitlement to a Zone A, multiple % Selective Reenlistment Bonus with obligated service through 24 August 1999. for a period C p e f Examiner Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01231 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: s s m : Having...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request to be awarded the NCO Professional Military Education Graduate Ribbon.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC AUG 2 11998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01238 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the DeDartment of the Air Force relating...
APPLICANT CONTENDS T H A T : His follow-on assignment from Air War College (AWC) as a Flight Surgeon is well below his qualification and is an act of reprisal - The applicant states that he is an Aerospace Medicine (physician) specialist. He is now appealing to the AFBCMR, because he was given a 4-hour notice that he would be placed on assignment since he had not been selected for any Squadron Commander j o b s he had volunteered for. After reviewing the evidence submitted, the Board found...
The additional raters statements only provide statements to be added to the contested reports. They find it interesting to note that both of the evaluators on the 29 June 1990 OPR made a PME recommendation, and the additional rater on the 29 June 1991 OPR made a command recommendation. d APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant's counsel reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states: "First, the Air Force argues that applicant's raters and additional raters all want to add...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D. C. JUL 2 8 l%8 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01250 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the A i r Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to to show that six ( balance. It...
A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Defense Finance and Accounting Service off ice evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). requested .
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not informed of the ADSC prior to entering training; that the ADSCs were not briefed to him at any time during the assignment process; and, that it was not until well after his completion of training when his unit commander pursued enforcement of ADSCs for all personnel attending training that he learned of the three-year Initial Qualification Training ( I Q T ) ADSC. During his in-briefing, as his new commander, he briefed the applicant that there was...
Air Force Board for Correction. - Attachment: Ltr, HQ USAF/DPRC, 27 May 1998, w/Atch Panel Chai'r DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 27 May 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ USAF/DPRC 1040 Air Force Pentagon Washington DC 20330- 1040 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records- This responds to a request for a BCMR advisory o records be changed to show he was due reimbursement for is requesting his sing allowance rent, higher, OHA...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC SEP 15 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01270 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that on 31 M coverage and his wife...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The applicant states no reasonable basis for the untimeliness of his request. A bad conduct discharge is an appropriate punishment for the offenses the applicant has committed.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). On 27 Sep 96, the IPEB found the member unfit for continued military service for a diagnosis seronegative spondyloarthropathy ankylosing spondylitis and recommended he be discharged with severance pay with a 20 percent disability rating. This is the reason why an individual can be found fit for military duty and later receive a...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . No other characterization of service is possible under law for service members separated within the first 6 months of entry. Applicant served only 20 days and therefore, the uncharacterized discharge is correct and in accordance with Department of Defense and Air Force directives.
Appiicantls submission is at Exhibit A. * The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant Is request that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to either general (under honorable conditions) or honorable on 26 September 1 9 8 5 (Exhibit C). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
After consulting counsel, applicant submitted a statement in his own behalf requesting an honorable discharge. He had completed 1 year, 2 months and 15 days and was serving in the grade of airman (E-2) at the time of discharge. Letter to Board for Correction of Air Force Records, RE: Discharge upgrade/DD form 293, November 6, 1997 8.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01303 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating to corrected to show that on 10 September 1997,...
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Separations Branch, Directorate of Personnel Program Management, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed this application and states that they concur with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant's recommendation that the applicant's reason for separation should be changed to "Secretarial Authority" with a SPD of "KFF." The Board notes that the AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends changing the narrative reason for separation on the DD Form 214...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant requests award of the I Service Medal. We recommend disapproval of the applicant's request to be awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal.
I D E P A R T M E N T OF THE A I R F O R C E HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPAE 550 C Street West, Ste 10 Randolph AFB TX 78 150-47 12 The applicant requests a constructive reenlistment to enable her to retire the first day of the month following High Year of Tenure (HYT). He needs an additional 38 months to retire effective 1 Jan 2000. We give this date since it is the first day of the month following the...
Therefore, Attachment: Ltr, HQ USAF/DPRC, dtd 27 May 1998, w/Atch Panel Chair I , MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ USAF/DPRC DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC - 1040 Air Force Pentagon Washington DC 20330-1040 27 May 1998 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Record- This responds to a request for a BCMR advisory on who is requesting his records be changed to show he was due reimbursement for his overseas housing allowance (OHA) under a...
They further state the citations for the award of the MSM, DMSM, and DMSM, 1OLC the applicant claim were missing from his OSR when he was considered for promotion by the CY97B board were filed in his OSR when his records met the board in December -. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and states that the basis of his request for SSB consideration is the result of an unfair review...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant ' s request on 15 April 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
* AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01319 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and separation program designator (SPD) code be changed so that he may reenter the Air Force. After 7 years of service, he was honorably discharged from the Army Guard on 14 November 1 9 9 7 with a r l l l l RE code. A copy of the complete Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...
He should be awarded the PH based on wounds he received when his aircraft was hit by enemy flak while on a bombing mission to Berlin, Germany, during World War 11. The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (Le., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bail out injuries, etc.). The applicant's former aircrew members have provided statements indicating that the applicant was wounded when their aircraft was hit by enemy flak and...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC JUC 0 7 i p s ~ Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01323 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 4 1998 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01330 COUNSEL : HEARING DESIRED: NO ~ Applicant requests his 23 March 1960 general discharge be upgraded to honorable. After careful consideration of applicant's request, we found insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
She applies now to change the reason for discharge “from personality disorder” to “adjustment disorder.” FACTS: Early in basic military training the applicant was evaluated by the mental health section of Wilford Hall Medical Center with a resulting diagnosis of “Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood DSM-IV Code 309.0.” Details of the evaluation are missing from the records, but the condition is noted on the letter of notification to the applicant that she was being recommended for...
Exhibit A. evaluated applicant's request The appropriate Air Force office to the Board recommending the and provided an advisory opinion The advisory opinion was application be denied (Exhibit C ) . Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. All other aviation cadet graduates of air crew training will...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The member is requesting that his record be corrected to allow his participation in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The member states that he did not have the package until much later than the mailing date.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC JUL 66 lB8 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 9 8 - 0 1 3 4 4 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. ment of the Air be corrected to charged and on Chief Examiner Air Force Board for...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS b RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01348 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No AUG 2 8 lB8 APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT: His late brother's DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Overseas Short Tour Ribbon, Air F o r m Training Ribbon, Air Force Longevity Service Award, and any other Air Force awards to which the applicant may be entitled. ...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98- 01353 . Attachment: Ltr, HQ USAF/DPRC, dtd 27 May 1 9 9 8 , w/Atch DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 27 May 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ USAF/DPRC SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Record 1040 Air Force Pentagon Washington DC 20330-1 040 "-r This responds to a request fofi a BCMR advisory on-ho records be changed to show he was due...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01383 XXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No Applicant requests his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, Block 1, Name, be changed to read ; and Block 15a, Member Contributed to post- era Veterans’ Educational Assistance Program, be amended by placing an X in the “Yes” block. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and...
Applicact's s u b x i s s i o ~ is at Exhibit Ti. The appropriate Air Force off;re evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory o p i n i o r . Appiicant's resporse to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. l2ursuar.t ts the 2 o a r d ' s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigatlon, Washington, D .
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01368 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions oflhe above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: of the Department of the Air Force ted to show that Special Order No. to reflect “Self...
Public Law (PL) 92-425 (21 Sep 72) which established the SBP, did not provide authority to change from spouse to former spouse coverage following divorce, nor to suspend premium payments when the retiree no longer had an eligible beneficiary. PL 98-94 (24 Sep 83) permitted retirees to elect former spouse coverage within one year following the divorce. Recommendation: Although there is no evidence of Air Force error, we recommend that the member's record be corrected to reflect that on 1...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. While legal addresses may change from time to time during a member’s career, HOR remains constant.
Attachment: Ltr, HQ USAF/DPRC dtd Jun 5, 1998, w/Atch Anel Chair/ DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 5 June 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ USAFBPRC 1040 Air Force Pentagon Washington DC 20330-1040 tion of Military Record This responds to a request for a BCMR advisory o records be changed to show he was due reimbursement fo is requesting his - allowance rent, higher, OHA rate ceiling than the one he was under while assigned to By way of...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Applicant's request to correc administratively corrected to sho The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The Air Force states that although Block 15a of the DD Form 214 covers members who entered the service during the Veterans Education and Assistance Program (VEAP) era, the applicant has since enrolled in the Montgomery GI Bill program, and VEAP no longer applies to him....
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions D E P A R T M E N T OF THE A I R FORCE H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FQRCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E T E X A S -- 21 August 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPC/DPAPPl 550 C Street West, Ste...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The advisory provided by the AFBCMR Medical Consultant, 15 Jun 98 gives information concerning applicant’s medical condition at the time of her enlistment. Commander advised that if the recommendation for discharge is approved, her discharge would be described as an entry level separation and she will be ineligible for reenlistment...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01396 AUG 2 4 S98 L A MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen rtment of the Air Force relating to be corrected...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01400 JUL 2 7 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36- 2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that: partment of the Air be...