AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03956
The Evaluations Report Appeals Board (ERAB) granted his request to remove his OPR for 2008 from his record because a Change of Rater (CRO) OPR should have been accomplished. The reaccomplished report stratified him at #1 of my 41 0-4s! h. While there are no guarantees, the stratification in the reaccomplished OPR would have most likely ensured his promotion to lieutenant colonel. In fact, in an e-mail the applicant provided to the ERAB as evidence, the military deputy spoke with him and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03960
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of staff sergeant. Based on the applicants pay grade as an E-4 on the effective date of his PCS orders, their office deemed that he did not qualify for the weight in addition to the administrative weight entitlement, and therefore exceeded his weight allowance. Special Order AB-005435, dated 19 December 2007, be amended to reflect...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03962
DPSI states that the request does not contain the required medical evidence and supporting documentation required for award of the PH. MRBP states the applicants request does not include the required supporting evidence, such as the applicants flight records, crew member logs or eyewitness statements, for award of the DFC. § 1130 clearly states that, Upon request of a member of Congress the Secretary shall make a determination as to the merits of approving the award however, it does...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03969
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating the applicant failed to demonstrate a clear error or injustice. The MTF has provided no documentation indicating the applicant should have been exempt from any component of th FA. A complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03970
Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations (38 USC 3319(b)(1). We took notice of the applicants complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03972
On 4 Apr 07, the discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged from the Air Force with an uncharacterized entry-level separation. DPSOR states a review of the applicants record reveals there was an error in his separation record. Specifically, the applicants DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, incorrectly reflects he was discharged with a separation code of JFX and a narrative reason of Personality Disorder. Since the applicant was diagnosed...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03976
However, between the time it was submitted and completed, it was discovered on or about 10 Mar 12, the position had been downgraded from an E-8 billet to an E-5 (staff sergeant) billet by the National Guard Bureau (NGB). A1PP states that after reviewing the documentation submitted by the applicant and coordinating with A1M, it was determined the E-8 position was downgraded to E-5 prior to the submission of the promotion package to the 113th Force Support Squadron on 11 Feb 12. The complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03982
The former service member may file and election change or the former spouse may request the service member be deemed to make an election on his or her behalf. In the latter case, the former spouse must provide legal documentation the service member agreed, or the court ordered the service member, to establish former spouse coverage. She has not provided any evidence showing the former service member made an election for former spouse coverage within one year of their divorce as required by law.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03985
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03985 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Standard Form (SF) 88, Report of Medical Examination, and SF 93, Report of Medical History, both dated 2 Oct 73, be removed from his records. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The SF 88 and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03990
While it is unfortunate the service member failed to elect SBP coverage on the applicant's behalf five times, it would be inappropriate to provide an additional opportunity to elect SBP coverage, an opportunity not afforded to other surviving spouses similarly situated. Although the applicant believes her medical condition may have precluded the service member from electing SBP coverage, it is the responsibility of each service member to elect the SBP coverage that best suits his family...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03993
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03993 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO __________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 25 April 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). While we note that said correction will not result in the applicant receiving an overall passing score, given the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03995
AFBCMR BC-2012-03995 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03997
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 10 Dec 74. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists for us to recommend an upgrade of the applicants UOTHC discharge. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03998
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. At no time during the applicants disability processing was he boarded for or given a disability rating for OSA. The OSA should have been...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04000
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04000 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The reasons for the action were as follows: a) During the period 18 through 23 June 1991, the applicant obtained services under false pretenses/unauthorized telephone service for which he received non-judicial punishment under Article 15 of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04004
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04004 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be granted supplemental promotion consideration to the grade of technical sergeant (E-6) for promotion cycle 12E6. The applicant was considered and non- selected for promotion to E-6 during promotion cycle 12E6. The remaining relevant facts...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04006
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. By the time she completed the process to extend on active duty, signed the SOU, and received approval for TEB she had an outstanding...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04007
AFBCMR BC-2012-04007 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04010
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04010 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The AF Form 3070A, Record of Nonjudical Punishment Proceedings, reflects the following: Block 3.a. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSOE does not provide a recommendation.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04011
The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 3 Feb 12 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he accrued 16...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04015
On 17 May 2010, an AF Form 4363, Record of Promotion Propriety Action, was initiated by the applicants commander, notifying him of his recommendation to delay the applicants 28 May 2010 promotion to first lieutenant (O-2) until 27 November 2010 due to his failure to meet exemplary conduct standards. On 11 June 2010, the applicant acknowledged the final decision of his promotion delay until 27 November 2010. However, the applicants promotion was delayed by the initiating commander before...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04016
Regarding the applicants request for promotion to chief master sergeant; Air Force Reserve personnel are promoted in accordance with AFPD 36-25 and Air Reserve Promotion Policy. The complete BCMR Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 26 March 2013 and 19 June 2013 for review and comment within 30...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04018
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04018 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed from Dunkirk, Maryland (MD) to Eagle River, Alaska (AK). The applicants contentions are duly noted; however, he has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe that his home of record was erroneously...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04024
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04024 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he went temporary duty (TDY) to Camron [sic] Bay, South Vietnam for 53 days and that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04037
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her home of record (HOR) be changed to reflect an address in Florida (FL). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of this case; however, she has not provided sufficient evidence which would lead us to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04049
Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Fitness Assessment dated 6 May 2012, be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The Board determined that the military records should be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, United States Air Force. Copy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04052
AFBCMR BC-2012-04052 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04056
The evidence provided by the applicant did not include medical provider recommended exemptions for the cardio component. If the medical evaluation validates the illness or injury and provides supporting medical documentation, the Unit Commander may invalidate the FA results by notifying the FAC in writing. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04059
On 11 Jun 12, AFBCMR sent the applicant the SAF/MRB Legal Advisory, dated 9 Apr 13, see Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF recommends approval. The complete NGB/A1PF evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was under the impression that ACP was not authorized at the time he signed his contract only due to Congressional...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04066
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04066 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 16 February 2012 be removed from his records. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 25 January 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04070
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04070 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions) or an honorable discharge. JAJM states the applicant does not allege an error or injustice, rather he believes the discharge should be upgraded due to the amount of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04074
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04074 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 23 July 2010 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant did not provide the requested documentation. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04079
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04079 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect she had six years of service. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant was appropriately credited for the service she performed. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04082
The applicant was considered and not selected by the CY11 Nonparticipating Reserve Major Promotion Selection Board (W0411A, 31 Jan 11) while he was assigned to the Nonaffiliated Nonparticipating Ready Personnel Section (NNRPS), and the CY12 Participating Reserve Major Promotion Selection Board (V0421A, 23 Jan 12). There were no errors in the applicants record at the time he was considered for promotion. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jan 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04084
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicants request to correct his rank to reflect A1C, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the service characterization was appropriately administered and within the discretion of the discharge authority. We took notice of the applicants complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04089
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The delayed release of the Air National Guard (ANG) FY12 ACP policy guidance resulted in him not being allowed to renew his ACP agreement in time to qualify for a two-year agreement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility and SAF/MRB Legal Advisor and are attached at Exhibits C and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04091
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for the AM w/5BOLC, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The evidence of record indicates the applicant was awarded the AM four times (basic award...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04093
After retiring and applying for one of his children to receive the benefit, he was told there was no record of his transaction. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the Post-9/11 GI Bill, Chapter 33 became effective 1 Aug 09. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04096
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04097
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04097 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His entry-level separation with uncharacterized service; Reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an Honorable discharge or entry-level separation without characterization of service); and Separation Program Designator (SPD) code...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04105
AFBCMR BC-2012-04105 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04107
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04107 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In the interest of justice, we also considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence related to his activities since leaving the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04109
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04109 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (failure to meet physical standards for enlistment) be changed to a code that will allow him to reenlist in the military. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04113
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04113 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The former members records be corrected to reflect that he made a timely election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). A member has no opportunity to make an SBP election before out-processing for retirement; however, a...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04114
AFBCMR BC-2012-04114 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04116
On 30 March 2011, the applicant was diagnosed with wheezing and was referred to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, other than the erroneously issued RE code of 4K that has been administratively corrected by AFPC/DPSOR to reflect 2Q, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred during the discharge process. Based on the evidence of record, it appears the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04121
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04121 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. Specifically, § 1552(f) permits the correction of a record to reflect actions taken by a reviewing authority under the UCMJ. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04122
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04127
On 23 May 1961, the decedent submitted a request to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) for an upgrade to his discharge. Prior to the incident that led to the decedents separation, he served honorably for a period of approximately eight years. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to FORMER MEMBER be corrected to show that on 2 Dec 1960, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions).
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04128
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04128 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In support of his request the applicant provides a personal statement discussing events that occurred after he entered the Air Force, Standard Forms 600, Chronological...