AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03804
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFMOA/SGHI recommends granting the applicants request to remain on active duty orders and receive service points for the time period of 13 Sep through 26 Oct 12 [sic] indicating, the applicant would not have been released from active duty, but would have received six weeks of physical therapy for his injury had his injury originally been found in the line of duty (LOD). While the evidence of record indicates that his line of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03808
AFBCMR BC-2012-03808 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Ltr, NGB/A1PS, dated 26 September 2012 2. Ltr, SAF/MRBP, dated 13 March 2013
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03810
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served on a temporary duty (TDY) assignment with the 6924th Security Forces Squadron, at Da Nang Air Base (AB), South Vietnam, from March through May 1970. In addition there is no documentation to verify that the applicant participated in TDY assignments to Da Nang AB, South Vietnam; therefore, he is ineligible for award of the VSM. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03817
At no time was he briefed on any additional requirements to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to documents provided by the applicant, he is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served from 3 September 1982 to 31 May 2009. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03818
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03818 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be promoted to the grade of staff sergeant (SSgt) with an original date of rank (DOR) and effective date of 1 July 2010. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03820
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03820 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to his dependents. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicants submission, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03823
The applicant did not provide evidence that indicates the run-time was documented incorrectly, nor contested at time of FA. The statement provided from his Unit Fitness Program Manager is noted; however, in the absence of a signed fitness assessment score sheet and signed fitness questionnaire, we find insufficient evidence to warrant disturbing the record. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 January 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03826
On 19 Jan 10, the applicant was counseled by Military Personnel Flight (MPF) via the AF IMT 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve on his extension request and his available options. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates his argument that he was miscounseled when told he...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03830
12731(a)(3) requires members who completed 20 years of satisfactory service prior to 5 October 1994 to also have completed the last 8 years of qualifying service in a Reserve component. 12731(a)(3) requires members who completed 20 years of satisfactory service between 5 October 1994 and 24 April 2005 to also have completed the last 6 years of qualifying service in a Reserve component. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03832
The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. While the applicant has provided some statements concerning his character, we find these statements insufficient to conclude that his post- service accomplishments are sufficient to overcome the misconduct for which he was discharged. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-03832 in Executive Session on 11 Apr...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03835
The applicant failed to complete the required mandatory PME or receive an approved waiver prior to his 28 Jul 12 retirement. Airmen with approved waivers must attend PME, in the higher grade, within 179 days of their effective promotion date, or as soon as they are available without impacting the mission. The DD Form 214 will reflect the active duty grade the member held at time of separation/retirement and the retirement order will reflect the rank as "highest grade held on active...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03836
However, his chain of command fabricated two additional LORs in order to involuntarily dismiss him from the military, and then denied his reenlistment in Mar 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03839
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03841
DPSID states that a detail review of the applicants military personnel record verifies he was deployed to the area of eligibility (AOE) in direct support of both Operations JOINT ENDEAVOR and JOINT GUARD. DPSID states that they could not verify the time period of the applicants deployments nor could they determine the location of his assignments in support of Operations JOINT ENDEAVOR and JOINT GUARD. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03843
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03843 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents while he was on active duty. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03846
The airman indicates the applicant completed the run portion of the FA ahead of his 12:59 run time. He again entered the track to provide support to the airman in completing the run by running with the airman and when they crossed the finish line the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) personnel incorrectly recorded his time as 13:34. In this respect, we note the applicant has provided a supporting statement from a fellow participant indicating the time recorded for the applicant must be...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03847
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03847 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). The RVCM is awarded to members of the US armed forces who, during the period 1...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03856
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03856 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 28 Feb 11 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). He was told he needed a valid FA in order to deploy whether it was a pass or fail, if he was put on a physical profile (DD Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03860
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03860 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 17 Apr 09, the applicant was notified of her commanders intent to recommend that she be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen for Fradulent Enlistment. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03861
AFBCMR BC-2012-03861 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03868
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03868 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation be changed. On 30 Aug 04, the applicant was notified of her commanders intent to recommend that she be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03871
They reiterated the SAF/IGQ case closure letter (22 Dec 09), para 3, stated the allegation that XXXXXXXXXX was found to be not substantiated. DPSID states they do not believe the applicant provided sufficient substantiating documentation or evidence to prove his allegation of two factual errors. As mentioned above, we note the applicant filed two IG complaints; however, the available record does not substantiate that either of the complaints filed alleged reprisal and it appears no...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03872
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C and F. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of his request for promotion reinstatement indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03873
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating the applicant was notified of his eligibility to participate in the RCSBP on 6 August 2004 because he had completed the required years of service under the provisions of Title 10, USC...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03880
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03880 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect: 1. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03882
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, noting the applicant was sent a memorandum requesting additional documentation, specifically, a copy of her AF FM 108 indicating she was evaluated and had medical condition that precluded her from obtaining...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03885
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/CV recommends denial, indicating there were no errors in his records as they met the boards. On 9 Apr 09, ARPC/DPP notified the applicant of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03898
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. DPSIT states the applicants application is not supported with evidence that he was a victim of an error or injustice. The applicants contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03900
Based on AFPC/DPSID review of the applicant's official military personnel record, they were able to determine the below Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons should have been awarded during his service from 17 October 1961 to 2 February 1965 and were not reflected in his records. The applicant's active duty service is from 17 October 1961 to 2 February 1965, which would not meet the eligibility requirements for the Air Force Longevity Service Award. The Air Force Longevity Service Medal is...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03902
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03902 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized discharge be changed to reflect honorable. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03903
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03903 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions). In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03906
In response to our request, applicant provided post-service information, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03907
Her DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects East Tawas, MI as her home of record at the time of her enlistment. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03916
Despite the applicants failure to submit a valid former spouse election change, he did not request SBP coverage to terminate following their divorce, indicative of his intent to continue SBP coverage for his former spouse. In this respect, we note 2 the applicant elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on full retired pay prior to his 1 Sep 00 retirement and believe his action to allow SBP premiums to be deducted from his retired pay for years following his divorce without requesting...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03921
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03921 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflect Regional Equipment Operator Training School. No documentation reviewed in the applicants records state completion of Regional Equipment Operator Training School. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03922
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His Military Personnel Flight (MPF) failed to notify him to reenlist prior to 1 Oct 10 to receive a Zone 3 Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United Air Force, required the MPF to notify him prior to the effective date of his AFSCs removal from the SRB list so he would have the opportunity to reenlist in time to receive the bonus. The remaining relevant facts...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03925
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The RE Code of 2C is required based on the ELS...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03926
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03926 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) scores, dated 10 Sep 09, 10 Dec 09, 31 Aug 10, 13 Oct 10, and 16 Feb 11, be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS); in the alternative, his records be corrected to reflect he...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03930
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03930 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessments (FAs), dated 27 October 2010, 26 January 2011, 26 April 2011, 15 July 2011 and 13 April 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). We also find that the FA dated 26 January 2011 should be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03931
AFBCMR BC-2012-03931 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03934
Joint Service Achievement Medal (JSAM) ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been awarded the requested medals. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service record, are contained in the evaluation provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03938
DPSIAR forwarded these documents to DFAS-CL and requested her SBP record be adjusted to reflect child only coverage based on full retired pay under the SBP, retroactive to her 1 October 1996 retirement, stop spouse SBP premium and refund the difference in monthly premiums subject to the 6-year statute of limitations. Evidence has been provided that supports the applicant was not married and attempted to elect child only coverage prior to her 1 October 1996 retirement. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03941
The administrative discharge board recommended discharge without consideration for probation and rehabilitation. His dates of time lost consisted of 1 September 1967 to 29 October 1967 and 22 November 1967 to 18 February 1968. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 17 April 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03945
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03945 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) and his promotion test score be amended accordingly. He contacted the 60th Awards and Decorations office, but they could not find any records of his medal. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03947
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service records, are contained in the Air Force evaluation at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/CCC recommends approval. Based on information in the case file, it appears erroneous information received regarding authorization for shipment prior to issuance of orders resulted in an injustice against the applicant, and their office concurs that he...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03950
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03950 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ____________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dishonorable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ____________________________________________________________________ _ COUNSEL'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The advisory opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03951
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03951 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her name be changed in her military personnel records to reflect Tina Garcia rather than Pamela Gene Garcia Combs. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03952
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the Presidential Unit Citation, Air Force Outstanding Unit Award and the Air Force Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03955
The applicant was not active duty during the inclusive dates for award of the Armed Forces Service Medal which was awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who, after 1 June 1992, participate, or have participated, as members of the United States military units. The applicant was not active duty during the inclusive period for award of the Air Force Training Ribbon awarded to service members who completed accession training after 14 August 1974. The DPSID complete...