RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04082
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be continued in the Air Force Reserve.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was deferred for promotion while assigned to the non-
participating Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). After being
reassigned to a participating unit, he met his second major
promotion board (less than a year later). His record only showed
that he completed some Unit Training Assemblys (UTAs) and his
annual tour; however, he used that time to complete the necessary
security clearance paperwork and took care of other issues that
made his status current. He attempted to be placed on orders
that were specific to his job; however, both times the orders
were unfunded because of budget constraints. He wishes to be
continued in order to prove his potential as a participating
member.
His complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was discharged from the Air Force Reserve (AFR) on
31 Mar 06.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the
Air Force, which is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/PB recommends denial. The applicant was considered and not
selected by the CY11 Nonparticipating Reserve Major Promotion
Selection Board (W0411A, 31 Jan 11) while he was assigned to the
Nonaffiliated Nonparticipating Ready Personnel Section (NNRPS),
and the CY12 Participating Reserve Major Promotion Selection
Board (V0421A, 23 Jan 12).
One of the requirements for continuation is that the officers
primary or duty Air Force Specialty (AFS) had to be manned at
less than 85 percent; however, he was not eligible because the
32E3 AFSC was not manned at less than 85 percent.
There were no errors in the applicants record at the time he was
considered for promotion. However, rather than be offered
continuation, the applicants record could be corrected to allow
him to establish a Reserve of the Air Force performance record,
which will improve his chances for promotion.
The complete PB evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 11 Jan 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Reserve Personnel Centers office of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error
or injustice. While ARPC/PB suggests partial relief by allowing
the applicant to establish a performance record which would
improve his competiveness for promotion; however, we find no
basis to recommend such relief. In this respect, we note that it
is more likely than not the reason he was not selected for
continuation was because his career field was not undermanned at
the time of his second non-selection for promotion, rather than a
weak record. Nevertheless, we find no evidence that he has been
treated any differently than other officers who are similarly
situated. In accordance with 10 USC 14301, all officers on the
RASL must be considered for promotion when eligible. Therefore,
in view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-04082 in Executive Session on 4 Apr 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Aug 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/PB, dated 21 Dec 12.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jan 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02059
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. When considered by the CY11 and CY12 Nonparticipating Reserve Major Promotion Selection Board, the applicant was assigned to the Nonobligated Nonparticipating Ready Personnel Section (NNRPS). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00089
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00089 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His non-selection for promotion to the grade of major (O-4) in the Calendar Year (CY) 2012 Individual Ready Reserves (IRR) Major Selection Board be removed from his records. In response to the applicants DD Form 149 requesting his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02838
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant contends he did not have sufficient time to prepare and be competitive for his major selection board. The applicant contends...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02322
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02322 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her non-selection for promotion to the grade of major by the Calendar Year 2012 (CY12) Nonparticipating Reserve Nurse Corps Major Promotion Selection Board, be removed from her record. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-03007
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03007 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His nonselections for promotion to the grade of major while assigned to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) be removed. The applicant has provided no evidence that the board's recommendations were in any way unfair or unjust. A review of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03409
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial of the applicant's request to remove the CY12 nonselection from her record. Through no fault of the applicant, her record was incomplete at the time she was considered by the selection board in question, in that four of her United States Marine Corps (USMC) evaluations (FitReps) were not...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02952
On 5 Jun 14, she received notification she was non-selected for promotion to major for the second time. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02947
The NPR has a promotion opportunity of one (1) at each board. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2013-02947 in Executive Session on 15 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Jun 13, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01275
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01275 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her nonselection for promotion to the grade of major while assigned to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) be removed. She will promptly provide her official transcripts to the appropriate office at AFIT and update her records to reflect...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05712
The applicant was discharged from active duty on 1 September 2007 and assigned to the Obligated Reserve Section until 10 May 2009. While assigned to the NNRPS, he was considered for, but not selected by, the CY11 and CY12 non-participating Reserve major selection promotion boards. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; that...