Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04097
Original file (BC-2012-04097.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04097 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His entry-level separation with uncharacterized service; Reentry 
(RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an Honorable 
discharge or entry-level separation without characterization of 
service); and Separation Program Designator (SPD) code be 
changed so he may reenlist in the military. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

There were no errors in his discharge processing, but he has 
corrected his performance since his discharge and would like a 
second chance at the military. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________ ______________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he commenced 
his active service on 4 Jun 12. 

 

On 2 Aug 12, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was 
recommending his discharge from the Air Force for unsatisfactory 
entry-level performance or conduct. The reason for the action 
was the applicant’s numerous unsatisfactory conduct and 
performance infractions while in Basic Military Training (BMT), 
as documented on his BMT Forms 105A, Basic Military Training 
Record, which document his failure to adapt in a military 
environment. 

 

On 2 Aug 12, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action 
and waived his right to consult with legal counsel and submit 
statements in his own behalf. 

 

 


On 3 Aug 12, the discharge authority concurred with the 
commander’s recommendation and the applicant was furnished an 
entry-level separation with uncharacterized service for entry-
level performance and conduct and issued SPD and RE codes of 
“JGA” and “2C,” respectively. He was credited with 10 months 
and 14 days of total prior inactive service. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of 
the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or injustice. Based on the documentation on file in 
the master personnel records, the discharge to include the 
service characterization, separation and reentry codes was 
appropriately administered and within the discretion of the 
discharge authority. Airmen are given entry-level separation 
with uncharacterized service when separation is initiated in the 
first 180 days of continuous active service. Therefore, his 
character of service and SPD and RE codes are correct and in 
accordance with DoD and Air Force instructions. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
change his RE code, noting the separation was carried out in 
accordance with established policy and administrative 
procedures. The RE code was based on the applicant’s entry-
level separation with uncharacterized service and was required 
in accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF; there 
is no basis to support a change in his original RE code. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 15 Feb 13, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit E). As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 


2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with respect 
to the applicant’s request to correct his record so that he may 
re-enlist. We took notice of the applicant’s complete 
submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree 
with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices 
of primary responsibility (OPRs) and adopt their rationale as 
the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the 
victim of an error or injustice with respect to his entry-level 
separation with uncharacterized service and the reentry and 
separation program designator codes issued to him in conjunction 
with his separation. Notwithstanding the above, we note the 
applicant has not been appropriately credited for his active 
service when he was separated. In this respect, we note that 
his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, indicates that he was credited with no active service. 
However, we have been advised by the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility (OPR) that his records will be corrected 
administratively. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend any relief beyond that 
granted administratively. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04097 in Executive Session on 11 Apr 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04097 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Aug 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 19 Dec 12. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 15 Feb 13. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Feb 13. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02501

    Original file (BC-2011-02501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 Jan 11, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for a condition that interferes with military service, specifically for mental disorders. DPSOS states, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the narrative reason for separation and separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04411

    Original file (BC-2008-04411.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The sole reason for his discharge from Basic Military Training (BMT) was his inability to perform the push-up requirement. On 24 Jun 97, the case was found legally sufficient and the discharge authority approved the discharge action on 27 Jun 97, directing the applicant be furnished an uncharacterized entry level separation. The applicant takes issue, however, with basis of the action related to his inability to adapt to the military environment, failure to make satisfactory progress in a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03505

    Original file (BC-2010-03505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 Jan 04, the applicant received an uncharacterized entry- level separation, with a reason for separation of entry level performance and conduct, and was issued an RE code of 2C. The applicant did not provide any evidence or identify any errors or injustices in the discharge processing, warranting a change to his narrative reason for separation and separation code. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04705

    Original file (BC-2010-04705.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04705 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow his reentry into the military. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02525

    Original file (BC-2010-02525.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02525 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 20 Oct 08, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for Erroneous Enlistment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05451

    Original file (BC 2013 05451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05451 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code of 2C (entry-level separation with uncharacterized service) be changed to one which will allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00261

    Original file (BC-2009-00261.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends changing the applicant's Separation Program Designator (SPD) code to accurately reflect his diagnosis of an Adjustment Disorder. The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting the applicant partial relief by changing the narrative reason for discharge to Secretarial Authority, but with no change in his uncharacterized service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03198

    Original file (BC-2010-03198.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03198 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a code that will enable him to reenlist. We note the applicant’s narrative reason and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01441

    Original file (BC-2010-01441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01441 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry level separation, separation code of “JFW” which denotes failed medical/physical procurement standards, and reentry (RE) code of 4C (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04634

    Original file (BC-2010-04634.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 22 Aug 02, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for mental disorders. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends the applicant’s narrative reason for separation and SPD code be administratively corrected to reflect “Secretarial Authority” and “KFF,” respectively, indicating that prior to 2003, the Services characterized all individuals discharged due to mental...