Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04109
Original file (BC-2012-04109.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04109 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (failure to meet physical standards 
for enlistment) be changed to a code that will allow him to 
reenlist in the military. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

During his pre-enlistment process, he informed the recruiter 
that he had childhood asthma but was told it wasn’t necessary to 
include that in the paperwork. The discovery of asthma happened 
as a result of a visit to the hospital during basis training for 
a sprained ankle. Because he was military dependent, all of his 
prior medical history was in the system. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted 
in the Regular Air Force on 6 Oct 09. 

 

On 27 Oct 09, the applicant was notified by his commander of his 
intent to recommend his discharge from the Air Force for 
erroneous enlistment. The specific reason for the action was 
that he did not meet minimum medical standards to enlist, as 
evidenced by as 23 Oct 09 medical narrative summary that found 
he did not meet the minimum medical standards to enlist. 

 

On 27 Oct 09, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action, 
waived his rights to legal counsel and to submit a statement in 
his behalf. 

 

On 29 Oct 09, the case was found to be legally sufficient and on 
29 Oct 09, the discharge authority directed the applicant be 
furnished an entry-level separation. On 30 Oct 09, the 
applicant was furnished an entry-level separation with 


uncharacterized service and credited with 25 days of total 
active service. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or injustice. The applicant’s discharge was consistent 
with the procedural and substantive requirements of the 
discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the 
discharge authority. His service characterization is correct as 
indicated on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or 
Discharge from Active Duty. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change 
his RE code, indicating the separation was carried out in 
accordance with established policy and administrative 
procedures. He does not meet current medical criteria for a 
waiver. 

 

A complete copy of the AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicant’s request for an 
RE code that would make him eligible to reenlist, indicating 
that while his RE code of 4C is erroneous, he should have been 
issued an RE code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an 
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without 
characterization of service) as required by AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF. The RE code 2C applies to all entry-
level separations without characterization of service regardless 
of whether the discharge is voluntary or involuntary. 
Therefore, because the 2C RE code is driven by his entry-level 
separation with uncharacterized service, AFPC/DPSOY will provide 
him a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with an RE code of 2C, 
unless otherwise directed by the board. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit E. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 3 Aug 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit F). 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting 
correcting the applicant’s record to allow him to reenlist. We 
took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging 
the merits of the case; however, other than the erroneously 
issued RE code of 4C that will be administratively corrected by 
AFPC/DPSOY to reflect 2C, we find no evidence of an error or 
injustice that occurred during the discharge process. Based on 
the evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s entry-level 
separation, with uncharacterized service for failure to meet 
medical standards for enlistment, was consistent with the 
substantive requirements of the governing instructions and 
within the commander’s discretionary authority. Therefore, in 
view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend favorable consideration 
of the relief requested. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04109 in Executive Session on 11 Apr 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04109 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Aug 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 19 Dec 12. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 22 Oct 12. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 24 Jan 13. 

 Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Feb 13. 

 

 

 Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04534

    Original file (BC-2010-04534.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04534 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02975

    Original file (BC-2012-02975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 03 Feb 09. Airmen are given entry-level separation with uncharacterized service when separation is initiated within the first 180 days of continuous active service. While the applicant’s military personnel records indicate that he was erroneously issued an RE code of 4C, his correct RE code should be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03496

    Original file (BC-2011-03496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03496 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of “4C” (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03614

    Original file (BC-2011-03614.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03614 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00909

    Original file (BC 2014 00909.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical authorities concluded the applicant had a pre-existing medical condition that would have precluded him from enlisting in the Air Force had this condition been made known in advance. The applicant entered active duty on 6 Apr 10 and was involuntarily discharged for Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards, on 22 Jun 10, with an entry level separation and uncharacterized service after serving 2 months and 17 days of service. The RE code 2C is required based on the entry...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01441

    Original file (BC-2010-01441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01441 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry level separation, separation code of “JFW” which denotes failed medical/physical procurement standards, and reentry (RE) code of 4C (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03259

    Original file (BC 2013 03259 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 May 2013, after her separation she saw an allergist and included his letter noting there was no reaction when she ingested shrimp. The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change her narrative reason for separation. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01758

    Original file (BC-2013-01758.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The documentation on file in the master personnel records supports the basis for discharge and his entry level service characterization. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSOA recommends his RE code be changed to “2C,” which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service." The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04255

    Original file (BC 2013 04255.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his RE code to reflect eligibility for reenlistment, medical discharge, or medical separation, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03334

    Original file (BC-2011-03334.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 Apr 09, the applicant was furnished an entry level separation with uncharacterized service for erroneous enlistment, with an RE Code of 4C, and a narrative reason for separation of “Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and...