RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04079
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her records be corrected to reflect she had six years of
service.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her discharge date should have been 30 September and not
31 August. Her total enlistment with her Army and Air National
Guard (ANG) service should be over six years.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a former member of the Air Force Air National
Guard (ANG).
Special Order AR 323 dated 4 Aug 98 reflects the applicant was
released from the New Jersey ANG on 30 Aug 98.
The applicants NGB Form 22, effective 30 Aug 98 reflects the
applicant was credited with 5 years, 11 months and 2 days of
service for pay.
The applicant ANG/USAFR Point Credit Summary dated 7 Nov 98
reflects the following:
FROM DATE
THRU DATE
AD
IDT
ECI
MBR
TOTAL
RETIRE
SAT SVC
92 SEP 29
93 SEP 28
0133
0045
0000
015
00193
00193
010000
93 SEP 29
94 SEP 28
0051
0041
0000
015
00107
00107
010000
94 SEP 29
94 NOV 28
0000
0000
0000
003
00003
00003
000000
94 NOV 29
96 FEB 28
CIVI
LIAN
STA
TUS
96 FEB 29
97 FEB 28
0131
0046
0000
015
00192
00192
010000
97 MAR 01
98 FEB 28
0037
0041
0000
015
00093
00093
010000
98 MAR 01
98 AUG 31
0000
0010
0000
000
00010
00010
000000
The applicant was credited with four years of satisfactory
service.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The National Guard provides no recommendation, based on the
guidance from the AFBCMR as the applicants the military
personnel records are difficult to read.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting
correction of the applicants record to credit her with six
years of service. Based on the available evidence of record, it
appears the applicant was appropriately credited for the service
she performed. Other than her own uncorroborated assertions,
the applicant has not provided any evidence that would indicate
that she was not appropriately credited for the service she
performed. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend granting the
relief sought.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-04079 in Executive Session on 25 Jun 13, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-04079 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Aug 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records.
Panel Chair
By letter, dated 2 Nov 96, the applicant was notified that since she had been twice considered and not recommended for promotion, the law required that her active status as an officer in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force be terminated not later than 15 Nov 96. Counsel’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Promotions Branch,...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02137
By letter, dated 2 Nov 96, the applicant was notified that since she had been twice considered and not recommended for promotion, the law required that her active status as an officer in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force be terminated not later than 15 Nov 96. Counsel’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Promotions Branch,...
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Performance Evaluation Section, AFPC/DPPPEP, also reviewed this application and indicated that while the applicant believes the ratings and comments on the EPR are inconsistent with her prior and subsequent evaluations, that does not render the report erroneous or unjust. DPPPEP does not believe that a personality conflict existed between the applicant and the rater. A complete copy of their evaluation is...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00833 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) for promotion to the grade of staff sergeant, Air National Guard, be changed from 1 Sep 96 to 1 May 83, which would allow him to be promoted to the grade of technical sergeant effective 15 Nov 97. However, when he...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01594
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01594 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6H (Drug Abuse) be changed to a 1 so she can reenlist. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-02693
DPFP stated that, after being diagnosed with a seizure disorder, the applicant was discharged from the New Mexico Air National Guard on 1 Feb 01. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the AFBCMR Medical Consultant provided the following advisory opinion. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01358 (Case 2) INDEX CODE: 126.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: A Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 14 Oct 97, and an Unfavorable Information File (UIF), dated Nov 97, be removed from her permanent records. The applicant provided copies of the 14 Oct 97 LOR, issued by her flight commander,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03576
DPP states that since the applicant never enlisted with the --- ANG or any other ANG unit she cannot be re-instated. DPPRSR states that the PALACE CHASE program requires the member to sign a contract in which the member agrees to serve two times whatever is currently owed to the Air Force in an Air Reserve Component unit. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Apr 03.
In her rebuttal to the Air Force evaluations (Exhibit F), applicant submitted an amended application and requested that the date of the commander’s indorsement on the DECOR-6 (Recommendation for Decoration Printout) (RDP) be changed from 18 May 1998 to 23 October 1997 and that the MSM be considered in the promotion process for cycle 98E8 to Senior Master Sergeant. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0394
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD01-0394 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0394 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH A1C) 1. Direct discharge with a general discharge either with or without probation and rehabilitation, or c. Forward this file to 19AF/CC with a recommendation for an honorable discharge either with or without...