Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04113
Original file (BC-2012-04113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04113 


 COUNSEL: 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

The former member’s records be corrected to reflect that he made 
a timely election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor 
Benefit Plan (SBP). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Her attorney timely submitted the proper documentation and 
election of SBP coverage on her behalf to the Defense Finance 
and Accounting Service (DFAS). DFAS confirmed receipt and 
indicated the request would be held in abeyance until the former 
member’s retirement. However, DFAS later notified the applicant 
that her election was not timely filed as, according to DFAS 
records, it was received four days after the their system of 
record reflected that the election was received four days late. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________ ______________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 31 October 2010, the member was relieved from active duty and 
retired, effective 1 November 2010, and was credited with 28 
years and 4 days of total active service. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIAR recommends approval contingent upon recovery of all 
applicable SBP premiums. Title 10, USC, Sections 1448(b)(2) and 
1450(f)(3)(A) pertain to a member’s and a former spouse’s 
responsibilities to elect, or to deem (respectively) SBP 


coverage when a divorce occurs while the member is on active 
duty. A member has no opportunity to make an SBP election 
before out-processing for retirement; however, a former spouse 
must submit a valid request to DFAS to deem SBP coverage within 
the first year following divorce. In the latter case, the 
former spouse must provide legal documentation the member 
agreed, or the court ordered the member, to establish former 
spouse coverage. In this case, the applicant and former member 
were married on 29 December 1983. They divorced on 28 September 
2007 and the court ordered the applicant be provided SBP 
coverage. On 12 September 2008, the applicant’s attorney 
submitted a SBP election request to DFAS. On 13 February 2009, 
DFAS acknowledged receipt and indicated the request would stay 
on file until the member’s retirement. The member retired 
effective 1 November 2010 and elected child only coverage under 
the SBP based on full retired pay. However, on 30 September 
2011, DFAS informed the applicant that her SBP coverage election 
was not timely filed. However, to deny the applicant’s request 
would be to deny her a benefit awarded to her by the court. 
There is no evidence the applicant or the former member have 
remarried, as such, there is no competing claimant. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 16 October 2012 for review and comment within 30 
days. As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office (Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) that it 
would be appropriate to recommend granting the requested relief. 
While DFAS apparently erroneously acknowledged timely receipt of 
the applicant’s deemed election for former spouse coverage, it 
appears as though her deemed election was not received by DFAS 
within one year of the divorce as required by the governing 
statute. Nevertheless, we believe the applicant and her counsel 


exercised due diligence in ensuring the deemed election was 
timely provided to DFAS and believe it would be an injustice to 
deny the applicant an entitlement awarded to her by the court. 
Therefore, in view of the fact there is no competing claimant, 
we believe it would be in the interest of justice to grant the 
requested relief and correct the records as indicated below. 

 

4. The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the FORMER MEMBER be corrected to show that on 
1 November 2010, former spouse and child coverage was 
established under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) based on full 
retired pay, naming the APPLICANT as the former-spouse 
beneficiary. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04113 in Executive Session on 7 May 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 August 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIAR, dated 2 October 2012. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 October 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02752

    Original file (BC 2012 02752.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The member did not request coverage for his former spouse be terminated and the fact that SBP premiums were deducted from his retired pay for over three years following their divorce are indicative of his intent to maintain the applicant as the eligible SBP beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect on 10 Apr 2009, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02752

    Original file (BC-2012-02752.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect on 10 Apr 2009, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, we agree with AFPC/DPSIAR’s recommendation that the member’s records should be corrected to reflect that he made a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03655

    Original file (BC-2012-03655.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03655 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for former spouse and child coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). However, there was no evidence that either the applicant or the former spouse made an election to change spouse...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04712

    Original file (BC-2010-04712.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Six days after the divorce was final, her attorney submitted a request to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) for her portion of the retirement pay and a SBP election for former spouse coverage, both awarded to her by the court. By letter dated 2 Feb 94, DFAS notified her attorney that a specific form was needed for the division of retirement pay garnishment. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01800

    Original file (BC-2012-01800.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 Oct 90, the parties divorced and the applicant was ordered to elect SBP on behalf of his former spouse. Neither party submitted an election for former spouse coverage within the first year of the divorce; however, the member did not request his former spouse be removed as the SBP beneficiary. The complete DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05021

    Original file (BC-2012-05021.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence either party submitted an election to change spouse coverage to former spouse coverage within the first year following their divorce. SBP premiums for spouse coverage continued to be deducted from the member’s retired pay, and the former spouse’s name and date of birth remained as the applicant’s eligible spouse beneficiary until DFAS-CL received his 19 Mar 12 request to change spouse coverage to former spouse SBP coverage. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01209

    Original file (BC-2012-01209.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    If neither the member nor the spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 27 August 1996, he elected former-spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) at the previous reduced level...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02598

    Original file (BC-2012-02598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, absent a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, we agree with AFPC/DPSIAR’s recommendation that the member’s records should be corrected to reflect that he made...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02598

    Original file (BC 2012 02598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, absent a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, we agree with AFPC/DPSIAR’s recommendation that the member’s records should be corrected to reflect that he made...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01307

    Original file (BC-2012-01307.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    If neither the member nor the spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. Even though a member fails to notify DFAS—Cleveland (DFAS-CL) of the divorce and continues to pay SBP premiums afterword, the former spouse is not eligible for annuity payments upon the member’s death. However, should the applicant provide a notarized statement from the deceased former member’s widow relinquishing her...