RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04016
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. Reserve Order EK-0550 dated 14 December 2001, Reserve Order
EL-2169 and all retirement documents from 2000 through 4 April
2009 be expunged from his record and be replaced with a medical
profile until the age of 60.
2. He be medically retired due to his combat related injury of
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Major Depression.
3. He be promoted to chief master sergeant.
4. His awards and decorations be updated.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was mismanaged in his position as an Air Reserve Technician
(ART). On 13 December 2001, a Merit System Protection Board
(MSPB) ruled that he was incompetent and not of sound mind. His
civilian records are being updated accordingly. He requests any
retirement related documents be removed from his military
records in line with his civilian retirement. He also requests
he be granted a medical discharge for the Air Force Reserves
failure to investigate his PTSD and major depression.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal
statement, medical records, letter of support and documentation
from his master personnel records.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 20 November 1968. On
3 January 2001, he received a physiciatric evaluation. That
evaluation stated that he would have significant difficulty
performing his job and his prognosis would be extremely poor
should he return to the same type of employment. On 14 February
2001, the applicant declined to have his case forwarded for
review by the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) for a
fitness only determination.
On 29 October 2001, he was notified that separation action had
been initiated against him due to physical disqualification. He
acknowledged the notification memorandum and his rights to elect
retirement or be separated with an honorable discharge. On
9 November 2001, he elected to be transferred to the Retired
Reserves effective 1 December 2001. As of 4 April 2009, he was
placed on the Retired Reserve List and authorized retired pay.
He was credited with 40 years, 4 months and 14 days for basic
pay.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K recommends denial of the applicants request for
promotion to chief master sergeant and denial of his request to
update his awards.
Regarding the applicants request for promotion to chief master
sergeant; Air Force Reserve personnel are promoted in accordance
with AFPD 36-25 and Air Reserve Promotion Policy. Under these
provisions, individuals must hold a primary Air Force specialty
code with a 9 skill level, 24-months time-in-grade, 14 years of
satisfactory service for retirement, complete Reserve component
Chief Orientation Course, be a satisfactory participant in
accordance with AFI 36-2254VI, Reserve Personnel Participation
and must meet physical fitness standards for promotion to chief
master sergeant. The individual must also be recommended by the
assigned supervisor and approved by the promotion authority
(commander). It is solely at the discretion of the assigned
supervisor/designee to recommend promotion to the promotion
authority when the individual has met the promotion eligibility
requirements for promotion to the next higher grade. The
applicant has not provided any documentation showing he was
selected for promotion to chief master sergeant by the promotion
authority.
With regard to the applicants request that his awards be
updated; AFI 36-2803, Air Force Awards and Decorations Program,
states no individual is automatically entitled to award upon
completion of an operation, temporary duty assignment or
departure for an assignment. It further states that
recommendations for awards should be initiated as soon as
possible following the act, achievement or service. The
recommendation should be placed into official channels within
two years and awarded within three years of the act, achievement
or service. There is no evidence a recommendation for award was
placed in military channels or submitted.
The complete AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C.
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends approval of the
applicants request to have his reserve retirement changed to a
disability with placement on the Permanent Disability Retired
List (PDRL).
The applicant served his country and the United States Air Force
for over 30 years. Through no fault of his own, he now has
conditions which preclude him from adequately performing the
duties required of his office, grade or rank. His medical
conditions create an unreasonable long-term risk to his health
and mission degradation; particularly relevant in the context of
the austere operational conditions and unrelenting physical
stressors confronting all members of the military. With this in
mind, the Medical Consultant opines it appropriate to have the
applicants orders amended to a medical retirement, effective
4 April 2009, which parallels his civilian retirement date.
The applicant also requests his Depression and Post-Traumatic
Stress Disorder be considered combat related. DODI 1332.38 is
clear in its intent that combat related is considered as while
engaged in hazardous service. Such service includes, but is not
limited to, aerial flight, parachute duty, demolition duty,
experimental stress duty and diving duty. The record indicates
the applicants depression and disappointment with the perceived
loss of core values, integrity and honor. These issues are
central to his request regarding PTSD and Depression.
Additionally, these issues all took place while in the United
States and not while engaged in hazardous service. While the
applicant was involved in a new mission platform with prolonged
hours and unidentified consequences, the benchmark for combat
related has not been met.
The applicants records should be changed to reflect permanent
disability retirement effective 4 April 2009, with a rating of
50 percent as follows:
Occupations and social impairment with reduced
reliability and productivity due to such symptoms as:
flattened affect; circumstantial, circumlocutory, or
stereotyped speech; panic attacks more than once a
week; difficulty in understanding complex commands;
impairment of short- and long-term memory (e.g.,
retention of only abstract thinking; disturbances of
motivation and mood; difficulty in establishing and
maintaining effective work and social relationships.
The complete BCMR Medical Consultants evaluation is at
Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 26 March 2013 and 19 June 2013 for review and
comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit E).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with regard
to the applicants request to be promoted to chief master
sergeant, update his awards, remove all retirement documentation
and that his PTSD be considered combat related. With regard to
these requests, after a thorough review of the evidence of
record and the applicants complete submission, we are not
persuaded that record warrants the noted corrections. The
applicants contentions are duly noted; however, he has not
provided persuasive evidence to override the rationales provided
by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and the
BCMR Medical Consultant. Therefore, we agree with the opinion
and recommendation of the OPRS and adopt their rationale as the
basis for our conclusion the applicant is not entitled to
promotion to chief master sergeant and his military awards are
accurate as currently reflected in his records. Furthermore, we
are not persuaded that his PTSD should be considered combat-
related as his condition was not caused while engaged in
hazardous service.
4. Notwithstanding the above determination, we believe some
relief is warranted. We agree with the BCMR Medical
Consultants opinion the applicant, through no fault of his own,
now has conditions which preclude him from adequately performing
all the duties required of his office, grade or rank. He should
therefore, be medically retired effective 4 April 2009, to
coincide with the date of his civilian retirement. Accordingly,
we recommend the applicants record be corrected to the extent
indicated below.
5. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. On 3 April 2009, he was found unfit to perform the
duties of his office, rank, grade, or rating by reason of
physical disability, incurred while he was entitled to receive
basic pay; that the diagnosis in his case was Post-Traumatic
Stress Disorder associated with Major Depressive Disorder VASRD
code 9411, rated at 50 percent; that the degree of impairment
was permanent; that the disability was not due to intentional
misconduct or willful neglect; that the disability was not
incurred during a period of unauthorized absence; and that the
disability was not received in the line of duty as a direct
result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war.
b. On 4 April 2009, he was not authorized retired pay under
the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 12731
and placed on the USAF Reserve Retired List, but on that date,
his name was placed on the Permanently Disability Retired List.
c. His election of Survivor Benefit Plan option will be
corrected in accordance with his expressed preferences and/or as
otherwise provided for by law or the Code of Federal
Regulations.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-04016 in Executive Session on 13 August 2013,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
All members voted to correct the record, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dtd 30 Aug 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 3 Dec 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dtd 18 Mar 13.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBC, 26 Mar 13.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 19 Jun 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00517
According to a letter from AFRC/DPM dated 27 July 2005, the applicant was notified of the recommendation that he be discharged IAW AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members, paragraph 3.14, Physical Disqualification. A complete copy of the A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the decision to grant the applicant relief cannot be based upon a medical assessment or whether an error has occurred, but...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02147
________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends approval, noting the applicants record should be amended to reflect, as a minimum, the applicant was placed on active duty orders for pay and points on 5 Mar 11 and remained so until his medical retirement effective 29 Aug 12. The applicants request is duly noted; however, we did not find the evidence provided substantial enough to override the opinions...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00072
Regarding the applicants request that she be given a 20 year active duty retirement with full retirement benefits, A1K states that her medical case which included the applicable documentation that ultimately led to a finding of ILOD was appropriately reviewed and a determination was made on that case by the PEB. The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant certainly...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00436
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00436 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her rank of master sergeant (E-7) be reinstated with her original date of rank of 1 January 2008. The discharge board that convened on 27 January 2011 found the applicant did not wrongfully use marijuana and recommended she be retained in the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04813
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) enlisted promotion and demotion policy was folded into an active duty Air Force publication AFI 36-2502, Airman Promotion/Demotion Programs, 31 December 2009. Air Force Reserve enlisted members are promoted to chief master sergeant in accordance with AFPD 36-25, Military Promotion and Demotions and Air Force Reserve Enlisted Promotion Policy. Based on this...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00062
He was eventually diagnosed with an Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome and on 25 August 2006 a LOD determination was completed with the finding that his condition existed prior to service (EPTS) thus making him ineligible for medical retirement. The Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) found the applicant unfit for continued military service and determined his condition was EPTS; however, the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) determined the applicant was unfit for duty but...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00162
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the BCMR Medical Consultant at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/SG recommends denial of the applicant's request and states that he was deemed medically disqualified for world-wide active military service due to chronic pain in his shoulder. Air Force Regulation (AFR) 35-41,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01227
It is unclear why no medical documentation was provided or why the case was not completed. In this case, he is not eligible for active duty orders. We note that the Air Force offices of primary responsibility state the applicants medical condition was not found to be in the line of duty; therefore no eligibility for active duty orders or pay exists.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03904
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03904 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official records be corrected to show he was promoted to the grade of master sergeant (E-7), effective 4 Aug 07. According to information provided by the applicant, special order P-049, dated 4 Aug 07, the applicant was promoted to the grade of...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00064
The Board further noted that after the applicants injury in Germany, he was returned to full duty after receiving occupational therapy, and that his recent injury happened during civilian employment, and therefore was EPTS. The second injury to the members wrist occurred in civilian status in 2005, and is therefore not service connected. The complete BCMR Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW...