Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04024
Original file (BC-2012-04024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04024 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect he went temporary duty (TDY) 
to Camron [sic] Bay, South Vietnam for 53 days and that he was 
awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His current DD form 214, Armed Forces of the United States 
Report of Transfer or Discharge, does not reflect his Vietnam 
service from 1970. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is a former member of the Air Force who served 
from 13 January 1969 through 3 February 1976. The remarks 
section of his DD Form 214 for the referenced period of service 
reflects “Vietnam – No.” He was, however, credited with 2 years 
and 1 day of Foreign Service during this period. 

 

After a review of his records, AFPC/DPSID verified the 
applicant’s entitlement to the Korean Defense Service Medal for 
the period of service of 4 February 1973 through 3 February 
1976, and will administratively correct his records, 
accordingly. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicants request to 
reflect he went TDY to Vietnam. A review of the applicant’s 
Master Personnel Records failed to substantiate he served in 
Vietnam. 

 

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 


AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the VSM. The VSM is awarded to 
all service members who between 4 July 1965 and 29 March 1973, 
served in the following areas of Southeast Asia: Vietnam and 
the contiguous waters and airspace; Thailand, Laos or Cambodia 
or the airspace thereof and in the direct support of military 
operations in Vietnam for 30 consecutive days or 60 non-
consecutive days. 

 

The Air Force Personnel Center, Director of Assignments was 
unable to verify the applicant had boots-on-the-ground in 
Vietnam. He is ineligible for the award of the VSM. 

 

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 3 February 2013, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date, this office has not 
received a response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the available evidence of record and the applicant's 
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, 
we find the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of 
proving that he meets the eligibility criteria for entitlement 
to the VSM. In this respect, we note that although the 
applicant contends he was sent TDY to Cam Rahn Bay, he provides 
no documentation to support this contention. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence that he meets the eligibility criteria for 
the VSM, we find no basis to grant the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 


application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04024 in Executive Session on 4 April 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Aug 12. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 20 Nov 12. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 25 Jan 13. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Feb 13. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02562

    Original file (BC 2013 02562.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02562 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04331

    Original file (BC-2012-04331.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for awards and decorations related to his service in the Republic of Vietnam, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-04331 in Executive Session on 2 May 2013, under the provisions of AFI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02295

    Original file (BC 2014 02295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02295 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following medals/ribbon: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02083

    Original file (BC 2013 02083.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects award of the VSM, however, DPSID is unable to substantiate the applicant was in the area of eligibility for this award. Furthermore, if the Board accepts the order as proof of Vietnam service, it only indicates 10 days, which does not meet the 30 day criteria for award of the VSM or the 6 month criteria for award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. The following documentary evidence in AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2013-02083 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03553

    Original file (BC 2013 03553 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSID states that the Air Force Personnel Center, Directorate of Assignments was unable to verify the applicant's Foreign Service time in Vietnam. Moreover, the applicant’s TDY orders and the Foreign and/or Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 match up perfectly. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01558

    Original file (BC 2014 01558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The VSM is awarded to all service members of the United States Armed Forces who served in Vietnam between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73 in the area of eligibility (AOE). THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02942

    Original file (BC-2012-02942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02942 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Vietnam and Thailand. He spent over 20 total months in Thailand, Vietnam, and Okinawa in 1967, 1968, and 1969. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01843

    Original file (BC 2013 01843.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01843 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected as follows: a. A though review of the applicant’s official military personnel records indicated there is no official documentation verifying the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00536

    Original file (BC 2013 00536.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He has documentation from a fellow service member who served in Vietnam with him who experienced a similar problem regarding his service in Vietnam, and how his records were corrected by the Air Force. Therefore, we recommend that his records be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02870

    Original file (BC-2012-02870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the DVA denied his claim because he could not provide a copy of his TDY orders or any official verification that he ever deployed to Thailand during the Vietnam War. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Oct 12, by letter, the applicant reiterates his original contentions. _________________________________________________________________ The following...