Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04093
Original file (BC-2012-04093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04093 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependents. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He completed the transfer of benefits on the website prior to 
his retirement. After retiring and applying for one of his 
children to receive the benefit, he was told there was no record 
of his transaction. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant retired from active duty, effective 1 Jul 11, in 
the grade of major (O-4). 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the Post-9/11 GI Bill, 
Chapter 33 became effective 1 Aug 09. Any member of the Armed 
Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, is eligible for the Post-
9/11 GI Bill, had at least 6 years of service on the date of 
election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their 
dependents. 

 

Service Secretaries were required, as of 22 Jun 09, to provide 
and document counseling regarding these benefits. The Air Force 
issued AFGMI on 23 Jul 09, which required pre-separation 
counseling be documented on DD Form 2648. 


DoD developed a special website to facilitate the transfer of 
educational benefits. On 27 Jun 09, the website was operational 
for the purpose of accepting transfer of benefits applications. 
Both the DTM and AFI 36-2306 state the transfer must be made 
while the member is serving in the Armed Forces. Both documents 
were published on government-hosted websites prior to 1 Aug 09, 
the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. 

 

Based on the facts provided, the applicant did not provide 
adequate documentation to justify an error or injustice. He 
received pre-separation counseling and indicated on his pre-
separation, DD Form 2648, that he did want counseling for 
educational benefits prior to his retirement. There is no 
record of the applicant applying for the benefit in the system. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

As part of his pre-separation briefing, the applicant was given 
guidance on where to apply for the transfer of benefits and was 
advised to transfer one month’s worth of benefits to each of his 
children. After the briefing, he did so and at the end of the 
process, the screen read “submitted” as his status. After 
several months passed, he went to the base education office to 
receive his counseling and confirm he had done what was 
necessary. He told the counselor what he had done and the 
counselor told him that he was good. He did not inquire again 
about the transfer until his oldest daughter was about to enter 
college. At that time, he was told there was no record of his 
request and his claim was denied. He was led to believe by both 
the web page and personnel from the base education office that 
he had completed the appropriate steps and therefore, requests 
that his records be corrected to allow him to reapply to 
transfer his education benefits to his children. 

 

A complete copy of the applicant’s response is at Exhibit E. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 


recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Other than his own uncorroborated assertions, the applicant has 
provided no documentary evidence whatsoever that indicates he 
was somehow miscounseled or that his failure to transfer his 
Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents was somehow the 
result of an error on the part of the Air Force. Therefore, in 
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04093 in Executive Session on 3 Jun 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Aug 12. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 18 Sep 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Oct 12. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 23 Oct 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00542

    Original file (BC-2013-00542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00542 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) to request Transfer of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04962

    Original file (BC-2012-04962.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the applicant was approved for retirement on 19 May 09, nearly three full months prior to the start of the program on 1 Aug 09. The applicant has not provided any evidence that he was never briefed of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01925

    Original file (BC-2012-01925.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Moreover, as indicated by the OPR, the Air Force did not engage in a service-wide effort to seek-out members who were already on terminal leave or who had already completed their pre-separation counseling, in order to provide them with additional counseling on the Post 9/11 GI Bill. ________________________________________________________________ requirements eligibility dependent met the 2 THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05040

    Original file (BC-2012-05040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least six years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, the applicant retired from active duty prior to the Tranfer of Benefits becoming effective on 1 Aug 09 and, other than argument and conjecture, he has presented no evidence to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03052

    Original file (BC-2012-03052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Both documents were published on government-hosted websites prior to 1 Aug 09, the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. Based on the facts provided, the applicant did not transfer his benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement and he has not provided any evidence that his failure to do so was the result of his being improperly briefed prior to retirement. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02355

    Original file (BC-2012-02355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02355 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01985

    Original file (BC-2012-01985.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not counseled on the requirements to transfer at least one month of education benefits to each dependent prior to his retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01391

    Original file (BC-2012-01391.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He applied for the Post 9/11 GI Bill prior to retirement; however, the transferability portion of the benefit had not been established at that time and believes for that reason he should be given an opportunity to complete this transfer. The applicant states that he applied for the 9/11 GI Bill right before he retired (no date of when this happened), but the transferability requirement for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01350

    Original file (BC-2012-01350.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After retiring from the Air Force he became aware that he was required to transfer his education benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement. He was not briefed that he had to transfer benefits before retiring. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2012-01350 in Executive Session on 13 Nov 2012, under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04334

    Original file (BC-2011-04334.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states “I out-processed the education office upon retirement, but still did not know that I had to transfer my Post-9/11 GI Bill while still on active duty.” Again, a second time that the applicant could have received the information and failed to ask. The applicant states “I did not sign away my right to not let my family have this benefit, the Air Force did.” The applicant did “sign away” his right to transfer benefits to his dependents, by failing to take action when given...