Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01284
Original file (BC-2012-01284.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01284 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
       
 
       
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  DD  Form  214,  Armed  Forces  of  the  United  States  Report  of 
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the 
Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
While on active duty he ferried C-130 aircraft from the Lockbourne 
AFB, Ohio to Vietnam from Jun 66 through Aug 66. 
 
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  VSM  is  awarded  to  all  members  of  the  U.  S.  Armed  Forces 
serving at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in the area 
of  eligibility  (AOE).    The  AOE  is  defined  as:  Vietnam,  its 
contiguous waters, or airspace there-over; in Thailand, Laos, or 
Cambodia,  their  contiguous  waters,  or  the  airspaces  there-over, 
and in direct support of operations in Vietnam.  To be eligible, 
a Service member must have served on TDY for 30 consecutive or 60 
non-consecutive days.  These time limitations may be waived for 
personnel who participated in actual combat operations.  A bronze 
service star denotes campaign participation and is awarded for at 
least 1 day served in each campaign phase. 
 
The  applicant’s  records  reflect  he  served  on  active  duty  from 
9 Jul 63 to 7 Jul 67. 
 
The  applicant's  performance  report  for  the  period  ending 
27 Nov 66, indicates he flew for six weeks in Panama on Operation 
GREENLEAF.  The report further indicates the applicant flew many 
logistical and tactical missions in the United States. 
 
The  applicant’s  AF  Form  7,  Airman  Military  Record,  Foreign 
Service Summary reflects he was on temporary duty (TDY) on three 
separate occasions, the first for 43 days, the second for 9 days 

and  the  third  for  7  days.    However,  the  locations  of  the  TDYs 
were not listed. 
 
The  applicant’s  DD  Form  214  dated  7  Jul  67  reflects  he  had 
3 months and 15 days of foreign service. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPAPP  recommends  denial.    DPAPP  states  a  review  of  the 
applicant’s  master  personnel  records  and  the  documentation  he 
provided  do  not  substantiate  he  had  foreign  service  time  in 
Vietnam.   
 
The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial.  There was no evidence located in 
the  applicant’s  submission  or  his  official  military  personnel 
record to support he served in the AOE for the required period of 
time for award of the VSM.  Although his records indicate he was 
TDY,  the  locations  of  the  temporary  duty  are  not  provided; 
however, his TDY for 43 days coincides with the TDY to Panama, 
mentioned in his performance report closing Nov 66.  However, the 
remaining TDY's are not 30 consecutive days or more; therefore, 
had  he  traveled  to  the  AOE  for  which  award  of  the  VSM  is 
applicable,  the  number  of  days  served  on  the  remaining  TDYs  do 
not qualify him for award of the VSM.   
 
The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 26 Jul 12, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The  application  was  not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough 
review of the applicant’s submission and the evidence of record we 
found it insufficient to conclude that he served or was stationed 
in  Vietnam.    Therefore,  we  agree  with  the  opinion  and 

 

2 

recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility 
and adopt their rationale as the basis for our decision that the 
applicant  has  failed  to  sustain  his  burden  of  proof  of  the 
existence of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  the 
application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. 
 
__________________________________________________________________ 
 
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2012-01284  in  Executive  Session  on  4  Dec  12  under  the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Forms 149, dated 3 Mar 12. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 1 Jun 12. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 2 Jul 12. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Jul 12. 
 
 
 
 
                                 
                               Panel Chair 
  
 

   Panel Chair 
   Member 
   Member 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04655

    Original file (BC-2011-04655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s requests...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01068

    Original file (BC-2010-01068.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01068 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 Jul 10, for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01247

    Original file (BC-2011-01247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Thailand and Vietnam; however, his orders and record copies reflecting his service from 1966 through 1977 are missing. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued in conjunction with his 28 Aug 70 discharge; an extract of an airman performance report (APR); a statement from a former...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03656

    Original file (BC-2010-03656.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03656 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he served in Vietnam. DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and the documentation he provided do not substantiate he had foreign service time in Vietnam. Therefore, we agree with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01746

    Original file (BC-2012-01746.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01746 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant served in units during their award periods for the RVNGC w/P, which would imply...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04289

    Original file (BC-2011-04289.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VSM is awarded to service members of the Armed Forces who served at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in Vietnam, Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia, their contiguous waters, or the airspaces there over, and in direct support of operations in Vietnam. Although the applicant received the VSM and RVCM, the award of these decorations did not require his actual presence in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03067

    Original file (BC-2011-03067.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His military service record be corrected to reflect the time he served in Vietnam. The DVA stated the evidence of record showed he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam Era, therefore, exposure to herbicides is conceded. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of his request for service in Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02704

    Original file (BC-2012-02704.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This implies the applicant’s unit provided combat support to military operations in the AOE for award of the VSM. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states the VSM is awarded to all members of the United States Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in the AOE. As a member of the 964th Squadron during this time period of...