Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01279
Original file (BC-2012-01279.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01279 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
 
His  records  be  corrected  to  reflect  65  days  service  time  in 
Korea. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He  was  a  Aircraft  Pneudraulic  Specialist  assigned  to  the  18th 
Field  Maintenance  Squadron  (FMS),  Kadena  Air  Base,  Japan  from 
Nov 1973 to May 1976.  
 
While assigned in Japan, he was sent on Temporary Duty (TDY) to 
Osan  AB,  Korea  on  at  least  four  different  occasions.    Each  of 
the following TDY trips to Korea lasted between 14 and 21 days:   
 
1.  Apr through May 1974 for 21 days in support of Air Defense 
Alert Mission Operations and the 18th TFW Operational Readiness 
Inspection (ORI).  
 
2.  Oct 1974 for 14 days in support of Air Defense Alert Mission 
Operations. 
 
3.  Nov  1974  for  14  days  in  support  of  Air  Defense 
Reconnaissance Operations. 
 
4.  Mar  1975  for  14  days  in  support  of  Air  Defense  and 
Reconnaissance Operations.  
 
In  support  of  his  request,  the  applicant  provides  copies  of  AF 
Form  626,  Request  and  Authorization  for  Temporary  Duty  – 
Military  and  AF  Form  899,  Request  and  Authorization  for 
Permanent Change of Station – Military. 
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 

 

1

 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  served  on  active  duty  in  the  Regular  Air  Force 
from  11  Sep  1969  to  30  Sep  1993.    He  retired  in  the  rank  of 
master sergeant (MSgt, E-7). 
 
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, reflects a total of 24 years and 20 days of total active 
service with 2 years, 6 months and 21 days of Foreign Service. 
 
The  KDSM  is  awarded  to  personnel  who  have  been  physically 
present  in  the  Area  of  Eligibility  (AOE)  for  30  consecutive  or 
60  non-consecutive  days.    Individuals  must  have  been  assigned, 
attached  or  mobilized  to  units  operating  or  serving  on  all  the 
land area of the Republic of Korea, on the contiguous waters out 
to 12 nautical miles, and all airspace above the stated land and 
water areas. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPAPP  recommends  denial.    DPAPP  states  after  a  thorough 
review of applicant’s military records, there was no mention of 
any time served in Korea.  Although he provided a copy of a TDY 
order,  a  TDY  order  does  not  prove  that  a  member  actually 
performed  the  TDY.    His  DD  Form  214  does  not  list  specific 
locations;  rather  it  reflects  the  amount  of  Foreign  Service  a 
member served.  The applicant’s Foreign Service reflected on his 
DD Form 214 appears to be correct. 
 
The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
He  provides  a  DD  Form  214-3,  Report  of  Separation  from  Active 
Duty, which he received shortly before he returned to the United 
States from Kadena AB, Japan.  The DD Form 214-3 (section 19), 
reflects  some  of  the  time  he  spent  TDY  in  Korea.    However,  it 
does  not  reflect  the  entire  time  he  was  TDY  in  Korea.    He 
reaffirms  his  previous  contentions  and  asserts  that  he  spent 
65 days TDY in Korea and would like his records to reflect his 
service time. 
 
His complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 

 

2

 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.    The  applicant’s 
response to the Air Force evaluation is noted, however, we find 
no evidence that his records should be corrected to reflect any 
service time beyond that currently reflected on his DD Form 214.    
Should the applicant provide travel vouchers to substantiate he 
had  additional  service  time  in  Korea,  we  would  be  willing  to 
reconsider  his  request.    In  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the 
contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief 
sought in this application.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission  of  newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered 
with this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 

 

3

 
 
 

 
 
 

     
  
 
 
 

 Panel Chair 
 Member 
 Member 

 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  this  application 
in  Executive  Session  on  13  Sep  2012  and  3  Oct  2012,  under  the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
  
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-01279: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 Mar 2012, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP dated 5 Jun 2012. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Jun 2012. 
    Exhibit E.  Rebuttal, Applicant, dated 29 Jun 2012, w/atchs. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  

 
 
Panel Chair 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
  

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

4



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01746

    Original file (BC-2012-01746.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01746 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant served in units during their award periods for the RVNGC w/P, which would imply...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01191

    Original file (BC 2014 01191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a personal letter to the board and states the USAF lost all of his personnel records when they sent him from Kadena AFB to Maxwell AFB for Retirement. Examiner’s Note: On 27 May 14 an inquiry letter was sent to AFPC/DPAPP requesting to adjust their advisory opinion in the following manner: “The applicant’s AF Form 7, Page 92 of his records reflects that he was in combat mission in Vietnam on 18 Oct 67. With respect to his request for his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02504

    Original file (BC-2010-02504.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation submitted failed to substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03721

    Original file (BC-2006-03721.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. The applicant did not provide any documentation showing he was assigned or TDY to Korea. There is no documentation in the applicant’s military records to reflect he was assigned or TDY to Korea.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02356

    Original file (BC-2012-02356.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02356 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records reflect his foreign service at Kadena Air Base (AB) Okinawa. The Board notes that the Air Force office of primary responsibility states the information provided failed to support the applicant’s claim of Foreign Service at Kadena AB,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02734

    Original file (BC-2008-02734.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02734 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show his entitlement to the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM). Service member must have been assigned, attached or mobilized to units operating in the area of eligibility for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02413

    Original file (BC-2012-02413.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 2 APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He asserts that he traveled to various locations in Korea, Vietnam and Japan. Should the applicant provide documentation that establishes he served in Vietnam or Japan, we would be willing to reconsider his request. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03636

    Original file (BC-2011-03636.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to reflect foreign service in Vietnam. DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation he submitted failed to provide any documents to substantiate foreign service time in Vietnam. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to add the VSM to his records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02164

    Original file (BC-2011-02164.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02164 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). There is no evidence of any time served in Vietnam. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...