DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01159
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be
changed to general (under honorable conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He respectfully makes his request for an upgrade to his character
of service based on leniency and the fact he has been a model
citizen, a responsible husband and father, and gainfully employed
for the past 30 plus years. He was young and ignorant of his
childish ways at the time of his discharge.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant began his military service on 14 Feb 72.
On 7 Nov 74, the applicant’s commander notified him of his intent
to recommend his discharge for misconduct. The reason for the
action was the applicant’s arrest by civil authorities on
2 Jul 74 for unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous
substance, to wit marijuana. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced
to 30 days in jail. He was also administered an Article 15 on
29 Nov 73 for wrongfully having in his possession .11 grams, more
or less, of marijuana. Furthermore, he was also confined in
South Carolina from 25 Jul 74 to 20 Sep 74 facing charges of bank
fraud and embezzlement from a Federal Credit Union; conspiracy;
illegal manufacture, use, possession, or sale of emblems or
insignia, forgery of U.S. Treasury check, and theft; and forgery
and cashing of U.S. Treasury checks.
On 7 Nov 74, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action and
elected to have his case heard by an administrative discharge
board. However, on 21 Nov 74, the applicant elected to waive his
rights to said Board and elected to submit statements in his
behalf.
On 11 Dec 74, the case file was found legally sufficient and the
discharge authority concurred with the commander’s recommendation
on 12 Dec 74.
On 20 Sep 74, the applicant was furnished a UOTCH discharge and
credited with 2 years, 7 months, and 14 days of total active
service, which included 79 days of lost time for the period
1 Jul 74 through 20 Sep 74.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigation Report,
which is at Exhibit C. On 27 Aug 12, a copy of the FBI report
and a request for post-service information was forwarded to the
applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).
In response, the applicant indicates he only tried to fit in with
the airmen he was serving with as they were from cities around
the country and he was considered a slow small-town country boy.
He admits to his ignorance of their ways. In support of his
request, the applicant provides a supporting statement from his
pastor.
The applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at
Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or
injustice that occurred in the discharge process. Based on the
available evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s Under
Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge for misconduct
was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation and within the discharge authority’s discretion. He
has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe his UOTHC
discharge was improper or contrary to the provisions of the
governing directive. In the interest of justice, we considered
upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not
2
find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to
recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Therefore,
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no
basis exists to recommend upgrading the applicant’s UOTHC
discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-01159 in Executive Session on 28 Sep 12, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Mar 12, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 27 Aug 12, w/atch.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 31 Aug 12, w/atch.
Chair
3
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00523
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00523 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions) and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to an eligible code. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04691
The administrative discharge board met on 5 Nov 82 and recommended the applicant be furnished a UOTHC discharge without probation or rehabilitation. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge on the basis of clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient for us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis at this time. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to grant the relief sought in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02267
On 22 Aug 73, the discharge authority concurred with the recommendation for an undesirable discharge without probation and rehabilitation. He accumulated 398 days of lost time, which includes 4 days absent without leave from 9 Aug 73 to 12 Aug 73, and 389 days of confinement from 31 Aug 73 to 23 Sep 74. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03609
Applicant was discharged with a BCD on 27 Sep 74. Based on his overall record of service, and in view of the contents of the FBI Report of Investigation, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge is warranted on the basis of clemency. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03525
The applicants commander approved the recommendation of the discharge board on 26 Nov 80. The applicant received a UOTHC discharge on 8 Dec 80 after serving 6 years and 14 days on active duty. In response to our request, applicant provided post-service information, which is attached at Exhibit A.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-03032
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03032 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant was discharged on 15 Dec 72, in the grade of airman first class, under the provisions of AFM 39-12, by reason of unfitness, with service...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02376
The maximum punishment authorized for the offenses for which the applicant was convicted was a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 10 years, total forfeitures of all pay and allowances, and reduction to E-1. The applicant’s sentence was well within the legal limits and was a fitting punishment for the offenses committed. The evidence of record reflects the applicant was convicted by general court-martial for wrongful use of cocaine resulting in a bad conduct discharge.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02621
On 26 Aug 87, he submitted a conditional waiver of his rights associated with an administrative discharge board. On 26 Nov 07, the Board staff requested the applicant provide documentation concerning his activities since leaving military service (Exhibit D). However, after a thorough review of the applicant's submission and the evidence of record, we see no evidence of any extenuating circumstances in this case.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00232_
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00232 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 JUL 08 ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge (UOTHC) be upgraded. A copy of the report was provided to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00492
Capt M started court-martial proceedings against him. Although he has no proof, he feels his discharge was based on the ill-feelings Capt M had towards him. The applicant submitted a similar application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his discharge be upgraded to honorable.