Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01145
Original file (BC-2012-01145.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01145 
COUNSEL: NONE 
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  records  be  corrected  to  reflect  a  temporary  duty  (TDY) 
deployment to Nakhon Phanom, Thailand in 1974.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
His  records  reflect  he  has  never  been  TDY  his  entire  career; 
however, his AF Form 910, TSgt, SSgt, and Sgt Performance Report 
during the period 1 Sep 74 through 1 Mar 75 states he was “TDY 
to a remote location and was commended for doing an outstanding 
job.”     
 
In  support  of  his  request,  the  applicant  provides  copies  of  AF 
Form  910,  Chronology  of  Service  Assignments  Listing,  and  a 
Report of Individual Personnel (RIP).  
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
On  19  May  71,  the  applicant  enlisted  in  the  Regular  Air  Force.  
He served 20 years, 8 months, and 12 days of active duty service.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial.  DPAPP states the applicant has a 
performance report from 1 Sep 74 through 1 Mar 75 that states he 
was TDY to a remote location; however, there is nothing in his 
records that indicates where the remote location was.  
 
The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
 

1

 

 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant  on  8  Jun  12  for  review  and  comment  within  30  days 
(Exhibit  D).    As  of  this  date,  this  office  has  not  received  a 
response. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of  the  office  of  primary  responsibility  (OPRs)  and  adopt  its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice.  We note the applicant 
provided  a  copy  of  his  performance  report  during  the  period 
1 Sep  74  through  1  Mar  75,  which  indicates  he  was  TDY  to  a 
remote  location;  however,  without  evidence  that  confirms  where 
the  remote  location  was,  we  are  unable  to  confirm  a  TDY  to 
Thailand.  Should the applicant provide evidence such as travel 
vouchers  or  TDY  orders  in  support  of  his  appeal,  we  would  be 
willing  to  reconsider  his  request.    In  the  absence  of  evidence 
to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to  recommend  granting  the 
relief sought in this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  Docket  Number    
BC-2012-01145  in  Executive  Session  on  14  Aug  12,  under  the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 

2

 

 
 
 

  
  
  

Panel Chair 
Member 
Member 

 
 
 
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Mar 12, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Record 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 24 May 12. 
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Jun 12. 

 
Panel Chair 

 
 

 
 

 
 

  
  

 
 

 
 

 
 

3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03763

    Original file (BC-2008-03763.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. There are no documents or evidence within his records that reflect he served in Vietnam. However, after a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the available evidence of record, we are not persuaded that he should be awarded the VSM.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05218

    Original file (BC 2012 05218.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP states that the Board should review the applicant’s records to see if Foreign Service other than what they were able to verify can be determined. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that his AF Form 7, Airman Military Record reflects he was TDY from 28...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01875

    Original file (BC-2005-01875.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01875 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM), and the Air Force Overseas Ribbon (AFOSR), and his service in Vietnam. A...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01166

    Original file (BC-2009-01166.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01166 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). DPSIDR also states they cannot support his request for award of the AFResM because he did not serve the minimum time necessary to qualify for this award.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01166

    Original file (BC 2009 01166.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01166 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). DPSIDR also states they cannot support his request for award of the AFResM because he did not serve the minimum time necessary to qualify for this award.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03099

    Original file (BC 2013 03099.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, does not reflect his service time in Vietnam and Thailand from 1973-1974. However, his master personnel records failed to provide any documents that substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00054

    Original file (BC 2014 00054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, personnel serving in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia in direct support of operations in Vietnam during the same time period were also eligible for the VSM. A thorough review of the applicant’s official military record did not locate any documentation verifying award of the VSM. The applicant provided TDY Order-Military, dated 24 Jan 67 assigning him to the 4133rd Bomb Wing (Provisional), Anderson Air Force Base (AFB), Guam; TDY Order-military, dated 22 Feb 68, assigning him to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03619

    Original file (BC 2013 03619.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03619 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his temporary duty (TDY) service in Thailand. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01030

    Original file (BC-2005-01030.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01030 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect award of the Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM), the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V), the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02467

    Original file (BC-2012-02467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also, he knows other veterans who served in Thailand during the same time period and were not in-country; yet, they received both medals. Furthermore, his performance report for the inclusive period 1 Oct 74 to 30 Mar 75, reflects he was assigned to Udorn RTAFB, Thailand; however, this time-frame is outside of the closeout period for award of the VSM and RVCM. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...