AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01302
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The 27 days of leave she lost at the end of fiscal year (FY) 2011
be restored. By amendment, the applicant requests if full
restoration of 27 days is not possible, she would like 17 days of
leave be restored.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was unable to use 27 days of leave due to her being deployed
in support of OPERATIONs Iraqi Freedom/New Dawn from 1 April 2010
through 2 March 2011, attending senior noncommissioned officer
academy (SNCOA) from 11 April 2011 to 30 May 2011, her permanent
change of station (PCS) move on 10 June 2011, and being placed on
half days from 8 August 2011 through 21 September 2011.
She believes she is entitled for leave restoration based on Title
10, USC, Section 701-F-l A&B, which contained a special
authorization that granted service members up to 120 days of
leave at the end of the fiscal year provided they served on
active duty for a continuous period of at least 120 days in an
area in which they were entitled to special pay for duty subject
to hostile fire or imminent danger under the provisions of DOD
7000. 14-R, volume 7 A, chapter 10. In addition, the member will
not lose any leave and 120 days of leave is the maximum amount of
leave that may be carried forward under SLA authority from FYI0
to FY14 (fourth fiscal year following the fiscal year in which
the member qualified for SLA).
In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of her
deployment orders, paid travel voucher, and leave and earning
statements.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of senior master sergeant (E-7).
On 1 April 2010, the applicant was deployed to Balad AB, Iraq for
an unspecified period.
On 17 April 2011, the applicant was ordered to perform temporary
duty (TDY) at Maxwell AFB, AL for a period of 41 days for the
purpose of attending the Senior Noncommissioned Officers Academy.
On 5 June 2011, orders were published directing the applicant’s
permanent change of station from Arlington, Virginia to
Washington, District of Columbia, effective 15 June 2011.
On 25 September 2011, the applicant was placed on convalescent
leave for a period of 43 days, which expired on 6 November 2011.
On 1 October 2011, the applicant lost 27 days of leave, as a
result of FY-end leave balancing.
Service members are ineligible for SLA when the following
precludes the use of leave: Normal PCS moves and TDYs, base
closures, hospitalization, aeromedical evacuations, quarters, and
convalescent leaves, details and special working groups, training
exercises,
research
requirements, pending separations and retirements, workload after
return from deployment and members did not take leave before
1 October, post-deployment recovery time, post deployment/
mobilization respite absence (PDMRA).
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial noting the applicant is not eligible
for leave restoration. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program,
paragraph 10.9, states, in part, that a member's application must
clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force
caused the member's lost leave. Furthermore, paragraph 10.8.1,
of the AFI states that members are not authorized leave
restoration for normal PCS moves and TDYs.
The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
attending
schools
or
courses,
and
2
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 26 July 2012 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s)
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-01302 in Executive Session on 4 December 2012,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
3
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-01302 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 April 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 21 June 2012.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 July 2012.
Panel Chair
4
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01298
During this time the applicant was forced to use 51 days of leave. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that fifty-one (51) days of leave were restored to his account commencing 2 October 2012. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 July 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05726
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. The guidance states members are ineligible for SLA when the following precludes using leave: Normal PCS moves and TDYs. AFI 36-3003, also states in paragraph 4.1.5., unit commanders: advise members who schedule use or lose leave in August...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05768
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05768 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Thirteen days of leave he lost at the end of Fiscal Year 2011 (FY11) be restored. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05768
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05768 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Thirteen days of leave he lost at the end of Fiscal Year 2011 (FY11) be restored. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01001
His wing commander agreed that he should be restored 10 days of leave and approved a Special Leave Accrual (SLA) request. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that he was deployed on Contingency Exercise Deployment (CED) orders prior to starting his already- approved ten days of use/lose leave for FY12. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01027
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01027 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Eight (8) days of leave be restored to his leave account. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01775
According to the information provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility the applicant carried forward 63.5 days of leave at the beginning of FY 2010. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03471
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03471 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 17 days of lost leave be restored, or as an alternative, he be allowed to sell back 15 days of leave. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, explains Special Leave Accrual (SLA) allows members who are faced with circumstances that prohibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00465
In Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07) and FY08, she requested SLA and was approved to carryover 120 days of leave. However, she came to understand that her SLA request in FY09 was lost when she changed jobs and was informed in Oct 09 that she had to either sell back or lose 10 days of leave. The application was timely filed.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01612
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01612 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 4 days of lost leave be restored. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, explains SLA shall not be a means to authorize the accumulation of leave in excess of 60 days (75 days from 1 October 2008 through 30 September 2013) when it is a result of the...