Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01302
Original file (BC-2012-01302.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01302 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  YES 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
        
 
       
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
The 27 days of leave she lost at the end of fiscal year (FY) 2011 
be  restored.    By  amendment,  the  applicant  requests  if  full 
restoration of 27 days is not possible, she would like 17 days of 
leave be restored. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
She was unable to use 27 days of leave due to her being deployed 
in support of OPERATIONs Iraqi Freedom/New Dawn from 1 April 2010 
through  2  March  2011,  attending  senior  noncommissioned  officer 
academy (SNCOA) from 11 April 2011 to 30 May 2011, her permanent 
change of station (PCS) move on 10 June 2011, and being placed on 
half days from 8 August 2011 through 21 September 2011. 
 
She believes she is entitled for leave restoration based on Title 
10,  USC,  Section  701-F-l  A&B,  which  contained  a  special 
authorization  that  granted  service  members  up  to  120  days  of 
leave  at  the  end  of  the  fiscal  year  provided  they  served  on 
active duty for a continuous period of at least 120 days in an 
area in which they were entitled to special pay for duty subject 
to  hostile  fire  or  imminent  danger  under  the  provisions  of  DOD 
7000. 14-R, volume 7 A, chapter 10.  In addition, the member will 
not lose any leave and 120 days of leave is the maximum amount of 
leave that may be carried forward under SLA authority from FYI0 
to  FY14  (fourth  fiscal  year  following  the  fiscal  year  in  which 
the member qualified for SLA). 
 
In  support  of  her  appeal,  the  applicant  provides  copies  of  her 
deployment  orders,  paid  travel  voucher,  and  leave  and  earning 
statements. 
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  is  currently  serving  in  the  Regular  Air  Force  in 
the grade of senior master sergeant (E-7).   
 
On 1 April 2010, the applicant was deployed to Balad AB, Iraq for 
an unspecified period.   
 
On 17 April 2011, the applicant was ordered to perform temporary 
duty  (TDY)  at  Maxwell  AFB,  AL  for  a  period  of  41  days  for  the 
purpose of attending the Senior Noncommissioned Officers Academy. 
 
On 5 June 2011, orders were published directing the applicant’s 
permanent  change  of  station  from  Arlington,  Virginia  to 
Washington, District of Columbia, effective 15 June 2011. 
 
On  25  September  2011,  the  applicant  was  placed  on  convalescent 
leave for a period of 43 days, which expired on 6 November 2011. 
 
On  1  October  2011,  the  applicant  lost  27  days  of  leave,  as  a 
result of FY-end leave balancing. 
 
Service  members  are  ineligible  for  SLA  when  the  following 
precludes  the  use  of  leave:    Normal  PCS  moves  and  TDYs,  base 
closures, hospitalization, aeromedical evacuations, quarters, and 
convalescent leaves, details and special working groups, training 
exercises, 
research 
requirements, pending separations and retirements, workload after 
return  from  deployment  and  members  did  not  take  leave  before 
1 October,  post-deployment  recovery  time,  post  deployment/ 
mobilization respite absence (PDMRA). 
 
The  remaining  relevant  facts  pertaining  to  this  application  are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial noting the applicant is not eligible 
for  leave  restoration.    AFI  36-3003,  Military  Leave  Program, 
paragraph 10.9, states, in part, that a member's application must 
clearly  establish  that  an  error  or  injustice  by  the  Air  Force 
caused the member's lost leave.  Furthermore, paragraph 10.8.1, 
of  the  AFI  states  that  members  are  not  authorized  leave 
restoration for normal PCS moves and TDYs. 
 
The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 

attending 

schools 

or 

courses, 

and 

 

2 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on  26  July  2012  for  review  and  comment  within  30  days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  an  error  or  injustice.    We  took 
notice  of  the  applicant's  complete  submission  in  judging  the 
merits  of  the  case;  however,  we  agree  with  the  opinion  and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant  has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this 
application. 
 
4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been  shown  that  a  personal  appearance  with  or  without  counsel 
will  materially  add  to  our  understanding  of  the  issue(s) 
involved.  Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  the 
application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  the 
application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of 
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered  with  this 
application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2012-01302  in  Executive  Session  on  4  December  2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 

  Panel Chair 
  Member 
  Member 

 

3 

The  following  documentary  evidence  pertaining  to  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-01302 was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 5 April 2012, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 21 June 2012. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 July 2012. 
 
 
 
 
                                 
                               Panel Chair 

 

4 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01298

    Original file (BC-2012-01298.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    During this time the applicant was forced to use 51 days of leave. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that fifty-one (51) days of leave were restored to his account commencing 2 October 2012. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 July 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05726

    Original file (BC-2012-05726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. The guidance states “members are ineligible for SLA when the following precludes using leave: Normal PCS moves and TDYs.” AFI 36-3003, also states in paragraph 4.1.5., “unit commanders: advise members who schedule “use or lose” leave in August...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05768

    Original file (BC 2012 05768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05768 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Thirteen days of leave he lost at the end of Fiscal Year 2011 (FY11) be restored. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05768

    Original file (BC 2012 05768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05768 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Thirteen days of leave he lost at the end of Fiscal Year 2011 (FY11) be restored. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01001

    Original file (BC 2013 01001.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His wing commander agreed that he should be restored 10 days of leave and approved a Special Leave Accrual (SLA) request. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that he was deployed on Contingency Exercise Deployment (CED) orders prior to starting his already- approved ten days of use/lose leave for FY12. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01027

    Original file (BC-2012-01027.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01027 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Eight (8) days of leave be restored to his leave account. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01775

    Original file (BC 2012 01775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the information provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility the applicant carried forward 63.5 days of leave at the beginning of FY 2010. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03471

    Original file (BC-2012-03471.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03471 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 17 days of lost leave be restored, or as an alternative, he be allowed to sell back 15 days of leave. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, explains Special Leave Accrual (SLA) allows members who are faced with circumstances that prohibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00465

    Original file (BC-2011-00465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07) and FY08, she requested SLA and was approved to carryover 120 days of leave. However, she came to understand that her SLA request in FY09 was lost when she changed jobs and was informed in Oct 09 that she had to either sell back or lose 10 days of leave. The application was timely filed.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01612

    Original file (BC-2012-01612.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01612 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 4 days of lost leave be restored. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, explains SLA shall not be a means to authorize the accumulation of leave in excess of 60 days (75 days from 1 October 2008 through 30 September 2013) when it is a result of the...