Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01238
Original file (BC-2012-01238.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01238 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  Fitness  Assessment  (FA)  dated  12  Dec  2011  be  removed  from 
the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He injured his right knee during the cardio component of the FA 
which caused an unsatisfactory composite score. 
 
He  completed  the  test,  but  was  unaware  that  he  was  allowed  to 
stop the test at the moment of his injury.  After the FA he went 
to the hospital and was put on a 21-day running waiver. 
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
Individual Fitness Assessment History. 
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force in the grade 
of senior airman (SrA, E-4). 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  DPSIM states on 27 Jun 2012, a 
memorandum  was  sent  to  applicant  requesting  additional 
documentation.    He  was  asked  to  provide  copies  of  his  AF Form 
469,  Duty  Limiting  Condition  Report;  AF  Form  422,  Notification 
of  Air  Force  Member’s  Qualification  Status;  and  AF  Form  108, 
Physical  Fitness  Education  and  Intervention  Processing,  his 
signed  fitness  assessment  score  sheet  and  signed  fitness 
questionnaire. 
 
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
On 28 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
C). 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.    Therefore,  in  the 
absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 

 

2 

The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  this  application 
in Executive Session on 15 Nov 2012, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603: 
 
     Panel Chair 
     Member 
  
Member 
 
The  following  documentary  evidence  pertaining  to  Docket  number 
BC-2012-01238 was considered: 
 
     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 May 2012, w/atch. 
     Exhibit B.  Letter, HQ USAF/DPSIM, dated 14 Aug 2012,   
                 w/atch. 
     Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Aug 2012. 
 
 
 
 
                                     
                                   Panel Chair 
 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01460

    Original file (BC-2012-01460.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. DPSIM states on 9 May 12 a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional documentation, specifically, the member’s signed FA score sheet and a letter from the FAC indicating that he informed them he was injured while completing the FA and was seeking medical attention afterwards. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01780

    Original file (BC-2012-01780.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIM states per AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program - Air Force Guidance Memorandum 4, Paragraph 10, If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF), but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 28 Aug 12, a copy...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02229

    Original file (BC 2012 02229.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He should have been allowed 42-90 days to complete a FA after his recommended release date. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Aug 12, for review and comment within 30 days. The AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, submitted by the applicant is noted; however, in the absence of the fitness assessment scoresheet, fitness...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04056

    Original file (BC-2012-04056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence provided by the applicant did not include medical provider recommended exemptions for the cardio component. If the medical evaluation validates the illness or injury and provides supporting medical documentation, the Unit Commander may invalidate the FA results by notifying the FAC in writing. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02896

    Original file (BC-2012-02896.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2905, Air Force Guidance Memorandum on Fitness Program “if an airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the unit commander.” In this instance it is clear the applicant did not report to the MTF upon completion of her FA due to the elevated heart rate. We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01643

    Original file (BC 2013 01643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW AFI 36-2905, Para 2.10.4 “Members with a duty limiting condition (DLC) prohibiting them from performing one or more components of the FA will have a composite score calculated on the assessed components.” On 14 Aug 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and was tested on the sit-up, push-up and AC components of the test. IAW AFI 36-2905; Attach 1, para 10, “If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results; and para...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02592

    Original file (BC-2012-02592.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-02592 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _____________________ _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 9 August 2011 and 7 June 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. We also find no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01591

    Original file (BC 2013 01591.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 Nov 2011, a medical evaluation letter was signed by the same provider who issued the previous AF Form 469s. The letter states, “There are medical conditions that preclude this member from achieving a passing score on the Air Force fitness assessment.” On 1 Dec 2011, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was initiated from his Medical Provider, which could exempt the applicant from the cardio and push-up components of the FA. On 27 Mar 2012, a medical evaluation letter was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03025

    Original file (BC-2012-03025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit B. In this case, the applicant was tested in accordance with his AF Form 422, dated 19 Dec 11, which states he is cleared to test on height, weight, and AC only and is exempt from all other components (start date 14 Dec 11 and end date 12 Apr 12). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02006

    Original file (BC-2012-02006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His provider’s memorandum for record (MFR) stated he had a medical condition that prevented him from attaining a passing score on the walking component of his FA; however, the test was not removed from his records. Upon expiration of your 42 days reconditioning, you are cleared to test in all components of the AF Fitness Test.” On 29 May 12, a memorandum was sent to applicant requesting additional documentation for removal of his FA dated 29 Oct 10. While he contends that he was...