AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00768
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The former service member's military personnel records were destroyed by fire in 1973. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSFM recommended denial and stated that after a thorough review of the information submitted by the applicant, there was no documentation to support the authorization of any Air Force Specialty badges. After a thorough review...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00844
In addition, her flight commander broke his contract with her not to fly on weekends and to not schedule her to fly on the same day as a major academic test. He told her that the standard was to recommend students for elimination with three academic failures while at the same time he recommended another individual for reinstatement. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00882
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-00882 INDEX CODE: 126.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Article 15 be set aside so that her discharge can be upgraded so that she may qualify for Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits. The service member may then consult with a defense counsel to determine whether to accept nonjudicial...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00890
His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 1999B Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board be voided and replaced with a reaccomplished PRF. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and furnished a detailed response and additional documentary evidence which are attached...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00893
On 14 Oct 01, the applicant’s commander told him his request for clemency was denied. A member accepting nonjudicial punishment proceedings may have a hearing with the commander. If the commander did not have the authority to impose the punishment, as in this case, the immediate commander should recommend suspending, mitigating, remitting, or setting aside the action to the next superior commander who is empowered to impose such a punishment.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00911
Personnel who do not perform at expected standards or require close supervision may believe that an evaluator is personally biased. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 9 Aug 02 for review and response (Exhibit E). JOHN L. ROBUCK Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2002-00911 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00938
They noted the argument that the applicant was forced to compete unfairly at the three SSBs conducted in 1998 because he was unable to compile or establish a record in his new grade of major before meeting these boards, and agreed with the assessment that meeting a lieutenant colonel board without any record of service in the form of evaluation reports in the grade of major certainly made the applicant less competitive and more likely to be nonselected. We agree with AFPC/JA that it is not...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00945
On 30 November 2001, the applicant submitted an appeal regarding the 31 March 2000 OPR to the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB). A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that the members of his supervisory chain were not in a position to provide a correct evaluation of performance for the period of the OPR in question. Only with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00950
Additionally, the recommendation for discharge without consideration for disability processing was inequitable because the existing medical condition was present at the time of her entrance into the US Air Force Reserve (USAFR), the USAFR was aware of her physical profile at all times, and based on the lack of consideration for her years of dedication and service. Documentation submitted in support of her appeal included her personal statement, extracts of AFI 148-123 (Medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00997
He returned to training on 7 September 2000, completed the training on 24 January 2001 and was promoted to SrA on 10 February 2001. Further, DPPI notes that the applicant refers to AFI 36-2502, Airmen Promotion, to validate his request for DOR change. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 May 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01026
Whereas the Air Force rates a member's disability based on the degree of severity at the time of separation. The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends the application be denied. Whereas the Air Force rates a member's disability based on the degree of severity at the time of separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01037
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states Public Law (PL) 99-145, established on 8 November 1985, required as of 1 March 1986 spousal concurrence of the SBP election, if the election was providing less than maximum spouse coverage. According to the Defense Finance and Service - Cleveland Center (DAFS- CL) the servicemember elected full spouse and child coverage under SBP, but later submitted a corrected election to decline SBP...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01053A
He was given a Reentry Code of “2Q,” “personnel medically retired or discharged” and a Separation Code of “JFL,” “involuntary discharge directed by established directive (No entitlements) for a physical disability which existed prior to entry on active duty, during a break in service, or during a period of inactive service, and was established by a physical evaluation board.” On 25 September 2002, the Board considered the applicant’s request and determined that the applicant should be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01056
The AFBCMR Medical Consultant stated that, at the time of separation from active duty with the Regular Air Force, the applicant’s left knee condition was not “unfitting” for continued active military service. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The additional advisory opinion is provided following review of the previous AFBCMR action granting the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01061
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After correcting errors in his military record, he was retroactively promoted to the grade of lieutenant colonel in Jun 83, he was given a date of rank as though selected by his original board, and as part of that board process, augmented into the Regular Air Force. However, because of the length of time it took to correct his records, he was not able to build a record as a lieutenant colonel to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01078
His EPR rendered for the period 6 Mar 01 through 30 Sep 01 be declared void and removed from his records; and, that the report be reaccomplished with the evaluation rewritten and considered for a senior-level indorsement by the wing commander. This reviewing commander was also the same commander to whom the appeal of the Article 15 action would have been made. In fact, the applicant provided a statement from his commander indicating that he did not receive a senior rater indorsement on his...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01087
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01087 INDEX NUMBER: 108.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force disability rating of 60% be changed to 100% to agree with the 100% rating he has been awarded by Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) and to allow him to withdraw from the Survivor Benefit Plan...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01092
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01092 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) be corrected to include the award of the Air Force Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), the Aerial Achievement Medal (AAM), the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM), his overseas duty history and assignment to Kadena Air Base,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01096
The MEB referred him to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states the Air Force medical standards regarding asthma are very strict, and even mild asthma is a disqualifying condition for continued service, even if it does not directly interfere with the individuals work performance. ROBERT S. BOYD Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2002-01096 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01096A
Members of the Board, Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Ms. Barbara J. White- Olson and Ms. Marcia J. Bachman, considered this application on 13 August 2003. BRENDA L. ROMINE Panel Chair Attachments: 1. Record of Proceedings, dtd 28 Apr 03 AFBCMR BC-2002-01096 INDEX CODE: 110.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01151
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS INDEX CODE 111.01 111.03 111.05 131.01 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-01151 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period closing 24 Oct 98 be declared void, the Performance Recommendation Form (PRF) for the Calendar Year 1999A (CY99A) Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01173
On 21 March 2002, the commander notified the applicant that he was recommending a discharge for erroneous enlistment. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01180
The following information was extracted from documents provided by the applicant (the member’s son) at Exhibit A and by the Air Force at Exhibit C. The applicant originally appealed through his Congressional representative on 10 Dec 01. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR notes the applicant has not provided any documentation showing his father was an officer and a pilot, awarded the DFC, demoted by court-martial from an...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01206
Subsequent to being evaluated by the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) and Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB), the applicant was released from active duty under the provisions of AFR 35-4 (Placed on Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL)). Following a period of observation and treatment on TDRL status, he was permanently disability retired on 12 Jun 1986, with a disability rating of 40 percent for his condition and received pay in the grade of colonel, with over 26 years...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01265
In reviewing the service member's record he had 19 years of service at the time of his death. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain her burden that she has suffered either an error or an injustice. Therefore, the applicant is not eligible to receive RCSBP annuity based on...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01276
AFPC/DPAMF2 noted that the applicant further cited a fifty-seven year old accession that he is aware of who had completed two years of active duty, separated, and was to return as a lieutenant colonel in Fiscal Year 2002 (FY02). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPOC evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPRRP reviewed this application and indicated that the United States Code (USC), Title 10, Section 8911, provides that the Secretary of the Air Force may, upon the officer’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01298
He was credited with 1 year, 6 months and 6 days of active service (excludes 35 days lost time due to periods of AWOL and confinement). Although the applicant did not specifically request consideration based on clemency, we also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on that basis. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 7 Oct 02, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01304
INDEX CODE: 135.00 AFBCMR 02-01304 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01305
HQ USAF/DPFM’s evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the additional Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 22 October 2002 for review and response. Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP1, dated 5 June 2002.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01313
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Hq USAF/ILGT recommends the applicant be reimbursed in the amount of $419.00. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected as indicated below. CATHLYNN SPARKS Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-01313 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01334
DPPD states that his medical records show he was treated for various conditions while on active duty, however, none were identified to be serious or life threatening enough to require referral through the Air Force military disability evaluation system. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states that the focus of the applicant's contention is that his current diagnosis of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01345
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01345 INDEX CODE: 131.09 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement grade of senior airman (E-4) be changed to reflect technical sergeant (E-6) and that he receive consideration for reinstatement to the grade of master sergeant (E-7). A Monthly Retirement Pay Estimate was introduced into...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01352
They indicated that after receiving the applicant’s DD Form 149, dated 14 January 2002, they needed additional information to sufficiently evaluate his claim and make an appropriate recommendation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to support his claim. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01374
He also claims that he is entitled to promotion because his current service for basic pay exceeds the high year tenure (HYT) for the grade of staff sergeant. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The applicant’s counsel reviewed the Air Force evaluations and indicated that at this time his client chooses not to respond to the advisory opinions. After...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01385
The AFPC/JA evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO recommends the application be denied, and states, in part, that officers will not be considered by an SSB if, in exercising reasonable diligence, the officer should have discovered the error or omission in his/her records and could have taken timely corrective action. Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we do not find these assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01386
Applicant’s DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, Item 27, Remarks, reflects he completed the Non-commissioned Officer Orientation Course in April 1978. They find that the applicant’s records reflect no indication the applicant performed any duties, assigned or attached, with the OSI or EOD. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reiterated his...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01387
The applicant, while serving in the grade of airman basic, was separated from the Air Force on 30 March 1956 under the provisions of AFR 39-17 (Unfitness) with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge. The Air Force Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s upgrade request to reenlist on 20 March 1959. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01397
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01397 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Promotion Recommendation (PRF), AF Form 709, prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 1999B (CY99B) Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, indicating a “Promote” recommendation, be replaced with a reaccomplished PRF containing a change to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01404A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01404 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests that the Board Discrepancy Report for Board P0501B be removed; his Officer Selection Record (OSR) for the Calendar Year 2001B (CY01B) Lieutenant Colonel Selection...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01429
Counsel discusses the difference between the applicant’s case and that of a former Air Force member, Hensala, who was discharged on the basis of his homosexual orientation. On 2 May 96, the Air Force Personnel Board determined that the applicant’s statements, along with other evidence in the case file, supported the finding that the applicant was homosexual and supported the recommendation that he be discharged for homosexual conduct. Additionally, we note that the applicant states in his...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01451
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01451 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Selection Brief (OSB) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 2001B (CY01B) Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, be amended in the "Assignment History" section by adding the duty title of “Joint Information...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01473
The Medical Consultant has indicated that he does not believe that the applicant’s episode of rhabdomyolysis was the result of an underlying muscle abnormality or disease, but rather was the result of other contributing factors; i.e., exertion, heat, pneumonia, and low blood oxygen due to the pneumonia. Therefore, the Medical Consultant recommended that the applicant be medically evaluated at WHMC to assess for an underlying muscle disease to determine whether the applicant’s history of a...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01476
Members of the Board Mr. John L. Robuck, Mr. Robert H. Altman, and Mr. Albert C. Ellett, considered this application on 14 October 2003. JOHN L. ROBUCK Panel Chair 2 Attachment: 1. AFBCMR BC-2002-001476 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01477
In support of his appeal, applicant provided copies of certificates of completion for the CAP Officer Correspondence Program, the Aerospace Power Course and Squadron Leadership School; and a copy of the DD Form 214, Certification of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, dated 1 Feb 01. At the time a member is separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE Code predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their separation. After reviewing the documentation...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01485
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-1485 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to honorable, his prior grade and rank be reinstated, and his reenlistment eligibility be changed to “Eligible.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01488
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01488 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be upgraded to 1 and that her uncharacterized entry level separation be changed to an honorable discharge. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPRS recommends the narrative reason for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01500
An AF Form 526 (ANG/USAFR Point Credit Summary), dated 15 Feb 86, addressed to the applicant, reflects that as of Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 15 December 1985 he had 18 years, 8 months, and 10 days of satisfactory service. They further state that the applicant would need an additional 1 year, 3 months, and 20 days of satisfactory service to gain eligibility for retired pay. After careful review of the limited records and the applicant’s submission, it appears the applicant believed that...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01515
On 19 Dec 00, the Secretary of the Air Force directed that the applicant be separated from active service for Physical Disability with severance pay. Thus, there is no evidence provided that his condition of excessive sun sensitivity has actually improved. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 15 Nov 02 for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01518A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01518 INDEX CODE 131.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s appeal for reconsideration, he again asks that he be afforded Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for the Calendar Year 2001A (CY01A) and CY01B Central Colonel Selection Boards with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01529
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. The applicant requested that on his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect an AFSC as an Airborne Electronic Counter Measures (ECM) Operator (293X4). As noted by the Air Force, the AFSC for ECM Operator...