ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01053
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code and separation code be changed
to allow his reentry into the service.
_______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was disability discharged with severance pay for chronic
low back pain on 23 Aug 99 after serving 1 year, 4 months and 29 days
on active duty. He was given a Reentry Code of “2Q,” “personnel
medically retired or discharged” and a Separation Code of “JFL,”
“involuntary discharge directed by established directive (No
entitlements) for a physical disability which existed prior to entry on
active duty, during a break in service, or during a period of inactive
service, and was established by a physical evaluation board.”
On 25 September 2002, the Board considered the applicant’s request and
determined that the applicant should be medically evaluated before it
rendered a decision regarding the applicant’s request. The Board
therefore directed that the applicant be issued invitational travel
orders to Wilford Hall Medical Center for the purpose of undergoing a
physical examination to determine his fitness for reentry into military
service and that the results be forwarded to the Board for a final
determination on his request.
_______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPD forwarded the results of the physical examination conducted
on the applicant at Wilford Hall Medical Center. They do not make any
further recommendation regarding the applicant’s request.
The applicant underwent a physical examination at Wilford Hall Medical
Center on 17 Dec 02. He was found to be worldwide qualified for
military service. The examining physician did point out that he was
unable to explain why the applicant experienced pain of an
incapacitating nature in his lower back several years ago while on
active duty. He also indicated that he could not predict the
applicant’s risk of experiencing such in the future.
The complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit H.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT”S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 22
Jan 02 for his review and response within 15 days. To date the
applicant has not responded.
_______________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL EVALUATION:
After again reviewing the complete evidence of record and the results
of the applicant’s examination, the Board determined that should it
grant the applicant’s request to change his RE code and narrative
reason for separation, his entitlement to the $2235.60 he received in
disability severance pay might be eliminated requiring him to reimburse
the Air Force regardless of whether he actually reentered service.
Consequently, the Board directed that the applicant be notified in
writing of this possibility and be required to advise the Board, in
writing, if he desired that the Board continue its consideration of his
case.
The letter advising the applicant is at Exhibit J.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL EVALUATION:
The applicant responded to the letter sent by the Board by stating that
he had no further information to add to his case and that he desired
that the Board proceed with his case.
The applicant’s response is at Exhibit K.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After receiving the results of the applicant’s physical examination and
his acknowledgement that he may be required to repay the disability
severance pay he previously received, the Board believes that the
applicant’s RE code and narrative reason for separation should be
changed to allow him to apply for reentry into military service. The
relief that the Board recommends will in no way guarantee that the
applicant will be accepted for military service, only that he will not
be excluded from applying. This recommendation also does not mean that
the previous discharge action was in error or constituted an injustice
at the time. The Board notes that the applicant’s records do not
contain any evidence of misconduct or poor performance, only that he
was found physically unfit for continued service. Since the applicant
is now considered fit for military service, the Board believes that he
should be afforded the opportunity to seek reentry into military
service. Therefore the Board recommends that the applicant’s records
be corrected as indicated below.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 23 August 1999,
he was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 by reason of
“Secretarial Authority,” with a separation code of “JFF” and issued a
Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “3K.”
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-01053 in
Executive Session on 12 March 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Panel Chair
Mr. E. David Hoard, Member
Ms. Diane Arnold, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit G. Record of Proceedings, dated 9 Oct 02,
w/atchs.
Exhibit H. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPD, dated 7 Jan 03,
. w/atch.
Exhibit I. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 22 Jan 03.
Exhibit J. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 6 Mar 03.
Exhibit K. Letter, Applicant, dated 8 Mar 03.
BRENDA L. ROMINE
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-01053
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to XXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX, be corrected to show that
on 23 August 1999, he was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-
3208 by reason of “Secretarial Authority,” with a separation code
of “JFF” and issued a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “3K.”
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01107A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01107 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: YES _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: By amendment at Exhibit K, the applicant requests her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to “Secretarial Authority” and she be given a medical disability retirement. The following documentary evidence was...
He was given a Reentry Code of “2Q,” “personnel medically retired or discharged” and a Separation Code of “JFL,” “involuntary discharge directed by established directive (No entitlements) for a physical disability which existed prior to entry on active duty, during a break in service, or during a period of inactive service, and was established by a physical evaluation board.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the evaluations prepared by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01096A
Members of the Board, Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Ms. Barbara J. White- Olson and Ms. Marcia J. Bachman, considered this application on 13 August 2003. BRENDA L. ROMINE Panel Chair Attachments: 1. Record of Proceedings, dtd 28 Apr 03 AFBCMR BC-2002-01096 INDEX CODE: 110.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00568 INDEX CODE 108.01 100.06 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2Q” (Personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to one that allows reenlistment. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPAE confirms the applicant’s RE code...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-00507
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-00507 INDEX NUMBER: 145.00 COUNSEL: Veterans of Foreign Wars HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that at the time of separation he received a higher disability rating and if this new disability rating qualifies him for medical retirement, he be medically retired with...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01236
On 26 July 2001, the SAFPC determined the applicant was physically unfit for continued military service due to a physical disability which existed prior to service and directed she be separated without disability benefits. The disability processing records indicate the applicant was treated fairly throughout her DES process and was properly rated under disability laws and policy at the time of her medical discharge. The applicant’s case was processed through the medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03811
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03811 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for his separation, listed in Block 28 of the DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, of Fraudulent Entry into Military Service be changed. ...
However, an error is noted in his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty), Item 28, which states the narrative reason for separation as being “Personality Disorder.” The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the current Air Force Instruction (AFI) regulating separations for mental health problems does not allow coding for other than “Personality Disorder,” an entirely different DSM-IV code sequence from that with which the applicant was diagnosed. A complete copy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00568A
He was issued an RE code of “2Q” (Medically retired or discharged) and a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of “JFL” (Disability, severance pay). A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded by email and requests an RE code which would allow him to enlist in the Air Force Reserves or to be reinstated in the Air Force Reserves as...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01096
The MEB referred him to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states the Air Force medical standards regarding asthma are very strict, and even mild asthma is a disqualifying condition for continued service, even if it does not directly interfere with the individuals work performance. ROBERT S. BOYD Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2002-01096 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...