Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01386
Original file (BC-2002-01386.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-01386
            INDEX CODE:  107.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded Office of Special Investigations  (OSI)  ribbons  for
job performance; he be given credit for Explosive Ordnance Disposal
(EOD) training; and he be awarded the M-16 Marksmanship ribbon.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

From August 1975 to 1977 his airman performance reports (APRs)  are
false and his medical records are missing documents.  When  he  was
reassigned to  the  Air  Force  Office  of  Special  Investigations
(AFOSI), his records  did  not  reflect  combat  readiness  or  EOD
performance.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 23 May 1975.  He was
promoted to the grade of senior airman (SrA/E-4), with an effective
date and date of rank (DOR) of 1 March 1978.

A resume of applicant’s Airman Performance Reports  (APRs)  profile
follows:

            PERIOD CLOSING              OVERALL EVALUATION

                 22 Nov 76                                    7
                 17 May 77                                    8
                 17 May 78                                    9
                 20 Jan 79                                    8

All performance reports reflect that the applicant was assigned  to
the --- Civil Engineering Squadron at Vandenburg  AFB  CA,  with  a
Duty Title as Base Sheet Metal Specialist.

Applicant was awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award and  the
Air Force Good Conduct Medal.


On 22 May 79, the applicant  was  released  from  active  duty  and
transferred to the Air Force Reserve under the provisions of AFR 39-
10 (Expiration of  Term  of  Active  Obligated  Service).   He  was
credited with four years of active duty service.

Applicant’s DD Form 214, Report of  Separation  from  Active  Duty,
Item  27,  Remarks,  reflects  he  completed  the  Non-commissioned
Officer Orientation Course in April 1978.  DD Form 215,  Correction
to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release  or  Discharge  from  Active
Duty, dated 17 July 2002, amended his DD Form 214  to  include  the
Air Force Longevity Service Award.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPPR reviewed this application and recommended no  further
changes to applicant’s awards and decorations.  They find that  the
applicant’s records reflect no indication the  applicant  performed
any duties, assigned or attached, with the  OSI  or  EOD.   He  did
perform duty as a Base Sheet Metal Specialist, and his only unit of
assignment was  the  ---nd  Civil  Engineering  Squadron  (CES)  at
Vandenburg AFB CA.  There is no indication that he was  recommended
for, or awarded, a decoration during this period.

There is no award for qualifying as Marksman on the  firing  range,
only for firing Expert (Small  Arms  Expert  Marksmanship  Ribbon).
There was no indication that applicant qualified as Expert.

Applicant did not provide any  documentation  to  substantiate  his
claim for performance in OSI or EOD, therefore, they were unable to
verify his eligibility for any decoration.

A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant reiterated his original request  for  the  aforementioned
awards and stated additionally that his training  records  are  not
accurate and his medical records for the period  of  1  Dec  75  to
1 May 77 are missing.  He gave a summary of  the  events  involving
his assignment to the OSI and  the  associated  medical  conditions
resulting from the assignment.

In support of his appeal, applicant provided a personal  statement,
a copy of a letter from his congressman; local unit/base  newspaper
clippings, extracts from his master personnel records, and  letters
from former co-workers.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit E.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient  relevant   evidence   has   been   presented   to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After a  thorough
review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are
not persuaded that his  contentions,  in  and  by  themselves,  are
sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided  by  the
Air Force.  Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary  responsibility  and  adopt  the
rationale  expressed  as  the  basis  for  our  decision  that  the
applicant has failed to  sustain  his  burden  of  having  suffered
either an  error  or  injustice.   Therefore,  in  the  absence  of
persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of  the  Board  considered  this  application
AFBCMR Docket Number 02-01386 in Executive Session on 4 March 2003,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Panel Chair
      Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
      Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 Apr 02, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 26 Jun 02, w/atchs.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Aug 02.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, 13 Aug 02, w/atchs.




                                   JOSEPH A. ROJ
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01355

    Original file (BC-2004-01355.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01355 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Action Ribbon. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01599

    Original file (BC-2004-01599.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01599 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR) and the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101027

    Original file (0101027.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01027 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) medal. He was awarded the PH by a general officer while he was in the hospital. He recently received a formal letter of presentation from the President of Korea which included the new ribbon and medal.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0201709

    Original file (0201709.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s records reflect that he was awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award, Air Force Good Conduct Medal, Air Force Overseas Long Tour Ribbon, Air Force Training Ribbon and the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon. We noted that he was asked to provide supporting documentation to substantiate his deployment to Libya in direct support of the Eldorado Canyon operations; however, he did not respond. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Sep 02.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01875

    Original file (BC-2005-01875.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01875 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM), and the Air Force Overseas Ribbon (AFOSR), and his service in Vietnam. A...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003244

    Original file (0003244.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. In addition, his Airman Performance Report (APR) rendered for the period 30 November 1964 through 16 June 1965 states that he flew 17 missions into Vietnam during the rating period. Although AFPC has administratively corrected his record to reflect award of the AM basic and the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), there is no evidence he was ever submitted for an additional AM.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00675

    Original file (BC-2004-00675.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00675 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 25 May 1955, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | bc-2007-01883

    Original file (bc-2007-01883.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01883 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 DEC 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, dated 30 Nov 79, be corrected to reflect award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) First Oak Leaf...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02579

    Original file (BC-2003-02579.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is a document that shows a 12-month tour in Vietnam from 28 August 1971 to 24 August 1972, however, the document is dated four years after the applicant was released from active duty. The evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 5 March 2004, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. There is a document which shows a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103591

    Original file (0103591.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his Individual Flight Records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s available military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. His Individual Flight Records show that he...