RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01386
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded Office of Special Investigations (OSI) ribbons for
job performance; he be given credit for Explosive Ordnance Disposal
(EOD) training; and he be awarded the M-16 Marksmanship ribbon.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
From August 1975 to 1977 his airman performance reports (APRs) are
false and his medical records are missing documents. When he was
reassigned to the Air Force Office of Special Investigations
(AFOSI), his records did not reflect combat readiness or EOD
performance.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 23 May 1975. He was
promoted to the grade of senior airman (SrA/E-4), with an effective
date and date of rank (DOR) of 1 March 1978.
A resume of applicant’s Airman Performance Reports (APRs) profile
follows:
PERIOD CLOSING OVERALL EVALUATION
22 Nov 76 7
17 May 77 8
17 May 78 9
20 Jan 79 8
All performance reports reflect that the applicant was assigned to
the --- Civil Engineering Squadron at Vandenburg AFB CA, with a
Duty Title as Base Sheet Metal Specialist.
Applicant was awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award and the
Air Force Good Conduct Medal.
On 22 May 79, the applicant was released from active duty and
transferred to the Air Force Reserve under the provisions of AFR 39-
10 (Expiration of Term of Active Obligated Service). He was
credited with four years of active duty service.
Applicant’s DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty,
Item 27, Remarks, reflects he completed the Non-commissioned
Officer Orientation Course in April 1978. DD Form 215, Correction
to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, dated 17 July 2002, amended his DD Form 214 to include the
Air Force Longevity Service Award.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPPR reviewed this application and recommended no further
changes to applicant’s awards and decorations. They find that the
applicant’s records reflect no indication the applicant performed
any duties, assigned or attached, with the OSI or EOD. He did
perform duty as a Base Sheet Metal Specialist, and his only unit of
assignment was the ---nd Civil Engineering Squadron (CES) at
Vandenburg AFB CA. There is no indication that he was recommended
for, or awarded, a decoration during this period.
There is no award for qualifying as Marksman on the firing range,
only for firing Expert (Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon).
There was no indication that applicant qualified as Expert.
Applicant did not provide any documentation to substantiate his
claim for performance in OSI or EOD, therefore, they were unable to
verify his eligibility for any decoration.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reiterated his original request for the aforementioned
awards and stated additionally that his training records are not
accurate and his medical records for the period of 1 Dec 75 to
1 May 77 are missing. He gave a summary of the events involving
his assignment to the OSI and the associated medical conditions
resulting from the assignment.
In support of his appeal, applicant provided a personal statement,
a copy of a letter from his congressman; local unit/base newspaper
clippings, extracts from his master personnel records, and letters
from former co-workers.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough
review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are
not persuaded that his contentions, in and by themselves, are
sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by the
Air Force. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the
rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden of having suffered
either an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
AFBCMR Docket Number 02-01386 in Executive Session on 4 March 2003,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Panel Chair
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Apr 02, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 26 Jun 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Aug 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, 13 Aug 02, w/atchs.
JOSEPH A. ROJ
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01355
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01355 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Action Ribbon. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01599
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01599 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR) and the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01027 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) medal. He was awarded the PH by a general officer while he was in the hospital. He recently received a formal letter of presentation from the President of Korea which included the new ribbon and medal.
Applicant’s records reflect that he was awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award, Air Force Good Conduct Medal, Air Force Overseas Long Tour Ribbon, Air Force Training Ribbon and the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon. We noted that he was asked to provide supporting documentation to substantiate his deployment to Libya in direct support of the Eldorado Canyon operations; however, he did not respond. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Sep 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01875
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01875 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM), and the Air Force Overseas Ribbon (AFOSR), and his service in Vietnam. A...
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. In addition, his Airman Performance Report (APR) rendered for the period 30 November 1964 through 16 June 1965 states that he flew 17 missions into Vietnam during the rating period. Although AFPC has administratively corrected his record to reflect award of the AM basic and the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), there is no evidence he was ever submitted for an additional AM.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00675
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00675 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 25 May 1955, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | bc-2007-01883
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01883 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 DEC 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, dated 30 Nov 79, be corrected to reflect award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) First Oak Leaf...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02579
There is a document that shows a 12-month tour in Vietnam from 28 August 1971 to 24 August 1972, however, the document is dated four years after the applicant was released from active duty. The evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 5 March 2004, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. There is a document which shows a...
In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his Individual Flight Records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s available military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. His Individual Flight Records show that he...