RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01473
INDEX CODE: 100.06
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2Q be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
While in basic training, he was diagnosed with pneumonia and
rhabdomyolysis. He was not discharged for the pneumonia but for the
rhabdomyolysis. The diagnosis was not supported by a doctor’s opinion
or lab results. While at the Wilford Hall Medical Center, he was
informed that rhabdomyolysis causes kidney and liver problems, as well
as muscle breakdown in the urine. He had absolutely no problems with
either his kidneys or his liver, both were in perfect working order.
They did find muscle breakdown in his urine. It was explained to him
that it may have been caused by the large bruises and cuts on both of
his knees and elbows, and the fact that the pneumonia would not allow
his muscles to receive the proper amount of oxygen. The bruises and
cuts were caused by warrior week and the low crawls over sand and
rocks.
Since his discharge, he has remained very physically active, and he
religiously runs three to five miles a day at least four times a week.
He has had no problems with his body or his lungs. On 16 Jan 02, he
underwent a complete physical at a Department of Veterans Affairs
(DVA) Medical Center in Chicago. It was the opinion of the medical
doctor that he be returned to active duty as soon as he wants.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided an expanded
statement, the results of a examination from the DVA Chicago Health
Care System, and a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release
from Active Duty.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 Jul 01 for a period
of six years.
On 19 Sep 01, while in basic training, the Emergency Medical Services
(EMS) was called to a training field after the applicant became
fatigued and confused. The EMS found the applicant to be hypoxic at
84 percent and transported him to the Wilford Hall Medical Center’s
Emergency Department. He was found to have multilobar pneumonia and
rhabdomyolysis and was admitted. He was released on 24 Sep 01
assigned to light duty for one week.
On 16 Oct 01, an MEB convened and established a diagnosis of
multilobar pneumonia with rhabdomyolysis, resolved. The MEB
recommended that the applicant’s case be referred to an Informal
Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). It also indicated that nonmilitary
hospitalization was required.
On 26 Oct 01, an IPEB convened and established a diagnosis of
rhabdomyolysis. The IPEB found that the applicant was unfit because
of physical disability, that the disability was incurred while the
applicant was entitled to receive basic pay, that the disability was
incurred in the line of duty, that the disability was ratable under VA
Diagnostic Codes 5021-5033 at 10 percent, and that the disability was
permanent. The IPEB recommended that the applicant be discharged with
severance pay.
On 1 Nov 01, the applicant agreed with the findings and recommended
disposition of the IPEB.
On 5 Nov 01, the Secretary of the Air Force directed that the
applicant be separated from active duty service for physical
disability under the provisions of 10 USC 1203, with severance pay.
On 8 Nov 01, the applicant received an entry level separation under
the provisions of AFI 36-3212 (Disability, Severance Pay), and
assigned an RE code of 2Q. He was credited with 3 months and 11 days
of active duty service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Medical Consultant noted that the applicant developed an episode
of rhabdomyolysis while in basic training. Rhabdomyolysis is the
abnormal breakdown of muscle cells releasing muscle enzymes into the
blood stream, in particular myoglobin, that can result in renal
failure and other complications. Rhabdomyolysis can occur due to a
variety of causes including high levels of exertion, trauma,
infections, drugs, and underlying muscle disease (including metabolic,
degenerative, and inflammatory disease processes). Heavy exertion in
hot climatic conditions that also results in dehydration and possibly
electrolyte depletion can cause this condition in otherwise normal
individuals as well as in those with predisposing underlying muscle
disease. A 1976 study of Marine Corps recruits found that nearly 40
percent had “substantial” elevations of muscle enzymes including
myoglobin, but remained asymptomatic during training. A variety of
underlying diseases of the muscle including genetic disorders of
muscle metabolism, muscle function, or inflammatory disease can
predispose to this condition, and an episode of rhabdomyolysis such as
this may be the only manifestation of an otherwise asymptomatic case.
It is the underlying muscle disease manifesting as rhabdomyolysis that
is the disqualifying condition. A single episode of rhabdomyolysis
due to causes not reflective of underlying muscle abnormalities or
disease may not necessarily be considered unfitting for continued
military service.
According to the Medical Consultant, the applicant developed
rhabdomyolysis in the setting of four significant contributing
factors: exertion, heat, a serious infection (pneumonia), and hypoxia
(low blood oxygen) due to the pneumonia. If the applicant did not
have the pneumonia and related hypoxia, it is quite possible that he
would not have developed rhabdomyolysis. The fact that he reported he
was asymptomatic with vigorous exercise, both now and during basic
training, suggests he is less likely to have an underlying genetic
disorder of muscle metabolism (or other abnormality) which predisposed
him to his episode of rhabdomyolysis. Had the applicant’s
rhabdomyolysis occurred only as a result of exertion in the heat, the
Medical Consultant indicated that he would have concurred with the
decision of the IPEB. However, in his opinion, the pneumonia and
related hypoxia were significant additional physiologic stressors that
resulted in rhabdomyolysis. In addition, the rhabdomyolysis appeared
to be mild in severity when considered in light of the severity of the
physiologic stressors, suggesting that the applicant is less likely to
possess an underlying metabolic muscle disease that would predispose
him to recurrent problems with exertion in the heat. It is possible
that he could suffer recurrent episodes of rhabdomyolysis if an
unrecognized disorder of muscle exists.
The Medical Consultant stated that Air Force Instruction 48-123,
Attachment 2, Medical Standards for Continued Military Service, does
not list rhabdomyolysis alone as disqualifying for continued service,
however Attachment 3, Medical Standards for Appointment, Enlistment,
and Induction, specifically lists rhabdomyolysis, or a history thereof
as disqualifying for enlistment. Thus, the applicant is potentially
caught in a “catch 22” where, if his request is granted to change his
RE code, he would still be disqualified from enlisting based on his
medical history. According to the Medical Consultant, it was under
the unusual circumstances of the added stress of the pneumonia with
hypoxia that triggered the rhabdomyolysis, and that the applicant
could have been kept on active duty. Recurrent episodes of
rhabdomyolysis following that initial episode would certainly have
been cause for MEB processing.
The Medical Consultant is of the opinion that the preponderance of the
current evidence suggests that the applicant did not have an
underlying disorder of muscle that disqualifies him from reenlisting
and that his request to change his RE code should be favorably
considered. He recommended that the applicant be evaluated by
Neurology at Wilford Hall Medical Center (WHMC) to assess for an
underlying muscle disease to determine whether the applicant’s history
of a single episode of rhabdomyolysis associated with pneumonia in Sep
01 can be waived for enlistment.
A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit
C.
AFPC/DPPAE conducted a review of the applicant’s case file and
determined that the RE code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or
discharged) was correct.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
In his response, the applicant indicated that his past was summed up
by the Medical Consultant’s advisory opinion. Since his discharge, he
has been attending college courses full time and working part time.
He exercises religiously and has not once experienced any problems
with his lungs or muscles. He is advising the Board of these facts
because he wants and needs to show the Board that he does not quit.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice warranting corrective action. The
evidence of record indicates that, while undergoing basic training,
the applicant was found unfit for continued military service after
being diagnosed with rhabdomyolysis and was separated by reason of a
physical disability. The applicant now requests that his RE code of
2Q be changed, indicating that he has not had any recurring problems.
The Medical Consultant has indicated that he does not believe that the
applicant’s episode of rhabdomyolysis was the result of an underlying
muscle abnormality or disease, but rather was the result of other
contributing factors; i.e., exertion, heat, pneumonia, and low blood
oxygen due to the pneumonia. Furthermore, it appeared to him that the
applicant’s condition was mild in its severity, suggesting that the
applicant is less likely to possess a condition that would predispose
him to recurrent problems. Notwithstanding this, rhabdomyolysis is a
disqualifying condition for enlistment. Therefore, the Medical
Consultant recommended that the applicant be medically evaluated at
WHMC to assess for an underlying muscle disease to determine whether
the applicant’s history of a single episode of rhabdomyolysis
associated with pneumonia can be waived for enlistment. Since a
determination cannot at this time be made whether the applicant’s
present condition is unfitting, we are not inclined to recommend a
change in the applicant’s RE code. However, after a thorough review
of the facts and circumstances of this case, we agree with the Medical
Consultant’s assessment and his recommendation that the applicant
should be medically evaluated at WHMC to determine whether an
underlying muscle disorder exists that would preclude his reentry into
military service. In our view, this is the appropriate course of
action at this point. In view of the foregoing, we recommend that the
applicant’s records be corrected to the extent set forth below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that invitational orders
to Wilford Hall Medical Center were issued by competent authority for
the purpose of his undergoing a physical examination to determine his
medical fitness for reentry into military service; that the results be
forwarded to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records at
the earliest practicable date so that all necessary and appropriate
actions may be completed; and, that all charges for the physical
examination be, and hereby are, waived.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
01473 in Executive Session on 14 Jan 03, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Panel Chair
Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Member
Mr. George Franklin, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Apr 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, Medical Consultant, dated 15 Jul 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 31 Oct 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Nov 02.
Exhibit F. Letter, applicant, undated.
CHARLES E. BENNETT
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-01473
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that invitational orders to
Wilford Hall Medical Center were issued by competent authority for the
purpose of his undergoing a physical examination to determine his
medical fitness for reentry into military service; that the results be
forwarded to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records at
the earliest practicable date so that all necessary and appropriate
actions may be completed; and, that all charges for the physical
examination be, and hereby are, waived.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02366
On 29 Jul 03, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) referred the applicant to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) for idiopathic rhabdomyolysis. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Jun 06 for review and comment within 30 days. ...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00904
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW Rhabdomyolysis Condition . No other conditions were service-connected with a compensable rating by the VA within 12-months of separation or contended by the CI.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00568 INDEX CODE 108.01 100.06 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2Q” (Personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to one that allows reenlistment. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPAE confirms the applicant’s RE code...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00034
The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. At a VA clinic examination on 12 October 2007, 4 months after separation, there was no weakness, muscle atrophy, with normal gait but persistent muscle pain.At the...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00523
All evidence to two Heat Strokes is in Military Medical Records. Even though I suffered two (2) Heat Strokes and was told I was being discharged for it, I do not receive any rating what so ever for it. Recurrent Heat Stroke with Rhabdomyolysis Condition .
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075429C070403
By memorandum dated 6 August 2001, the applicant was informed that an informal PEB found his unfitting condition warranted a combined rating of less than 30 percent which would result in his separation with severance pay. Once a soldier is determined to be physically unfit for further military service, percentage ratings are applied to the unfitting conditions from the VASRD. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011662
The applicant requests correction of his retirement orders to show his disability did (instead of did not) result from a combat-related injury as defined in Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104. The applicant states: * His disability was combat related; he was conducting a tactical road march, in full gear, when he was injured during the last obstacle of the Expert Field Medical Badge (EFMB) training * This training was a simulation of war, in preparation to act as an expert field medic in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01236
On 26 July 2001, the SAFPC determined the applicant was physically unfit for continued military service due to a physical disability which existed prior to service and directed she be separated without disability benefits. The disability processing records indicate the applicant was treated fairly throughout her DES process and was properly rated under disability laws and policy at the time of her medical discharge. The applicant’s case was processed through the medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00568A
He was issued an RE code of “2Q” (Medically retired or discharged) and a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of “JFL” (Disability, severance pay). A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded by email and requests an RE code which would allow him to enlist in the Air Force Reserves or to be reinstated in the Air Force Reserves as...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00355
The CI experienced right knee pain with running and was periodically issued physical profiles from May 2001 to May 2002. The C&P examination 14 months after separation recorded complaint of right knee pain with walking and stairs. The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES.