Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01352
Original file (BC-2002-01352.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-01352
            INDEX CODE:  128.14

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He  be  reimbursed  for  the  amount  of  Servicemembers’  Group  Life
Insurance (SGLI) deducted from his pay.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He signed for $100,000.00 not $250,000.00 SGLI coverage.

In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a Leave and  Earnings
Statement for the period 1-31 December 2001.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving on  extended  active  duty  in  the
grade of captain.

Section 312 of Public Law  106-419,  1  November  2000,  automatically
increased the level of SGLI coverage for all eligible military members
from $200,000  to  $250,000  effective  1  April  2001.   Implementing
guidance dated 12 March 2001 stipulated that members eligible for SGLI
on 31 March 2001 with continued eligibility on 1 April 2001 would have
their SGLI increased to $250,000 effective 1 April 2001, regardless of
any prior election.   Members  who  had  elected  less  than  $250,000
coverage prior  to  1 April  2001  could  avoid  any  higher  premiums
provided they completed a new SGLV 8286 in April 2001 to retain  their
previously elected coverage.
_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPW recommended denial.  They indicated that  after  receiving
the applicant’s DD Form  149,  dated  14  January  2002,  they  needed
additional information to sufficiently evaluate his claim and make  an
appropriate recommendation.  On 15 May 2002 they sent a letter to  the
applicant requesting the additional information.  They did not receive
a response.

The evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 26 July 2002, a  copy  of  the  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant for review and response within thirty (30) days.  As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for  our  conclusion  that  the
applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to support  his  claim.
On  15  May  2002,  AFPC/DPW  forwarded  a  letter  to  the  applicant
requesting additional documentation to process his case  (i.e.,  leave
and earnings statements, current and previous  SGLI  certificates  and
any other documentation to support his claim).  He failed  to  provide
this documentation.  Therefore, in the  absence  of  evidence  to  the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of  an  error  or  an  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
01352 in Executive Session on 12 December 2002, under  the  provisions
of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member
                 Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 14 January 2002, w/atch.
   Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPW, dated 19 July 2002, w/atch.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 July 2002.




                       JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
                       Panel Chair




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02700

    Original file (BC-2002-02700.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to support his claim. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2002-02700 in Executive Session on 15 April 2003, under the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02563

    Original file (BC-2002-02563.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Members who had elected no coverage or less than $250,000 coverage prior to 1 April 2001, could avoid the higher premiums provided they completed a new election form in April 2001. No evidence has been submitted showing that the applicant declined coverage during the month of April 2001. We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that no basis exists to reimburse the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102059A

    Original file (0102059A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, they recommend the Board approve applicant’s request and authorize reimbursement of all overcharged premiums effective 1 July 2001 and disapprove reimbursement of all charged premiums from 1 April 2001 through 30 June 2001. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 April 2002 for review and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02700A

    Original file (BC-2002-02700A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's request to be reimbursed for his SGLI premiums was considered and denied by the Board on 15 April 2003. Lackland AFB notified its servicemembers of the pending change to SGLI coverage by using the base bulletins, newspapers, and the April 2001 pay statements. It would appear that he was notified of the SGLI increase and we find no evidence to support his miscounseling contention.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201462

    Original file (0201462.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 February 2002, the applicant completed a new SGLV 8286 declining coverage _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommended denial. It is their opinion that the Aviano AB leadership took adequate steps as directed to inform all members of the increase in coverage and that the applicant had adequate time during the month of April 2001 to make a new election and avoid the increased premium. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-03442

    Original file (BC-2001-03442.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 17 April 2002, the applicant provided additional information, with attachments, to support her appeal. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPW stated that the applicant was erroneously charged for SGLI for the period of 20 Feb 98 to 31 Mar 01. In their opinion,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103224

    Original file (0103224.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03224 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for the Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (SGLI) premiums automatically deducted from April through September 2001. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102344

    Original file (0102344.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Members who failed to complete a new SGLV 8286 during the month of April 01 to elect a lower amount of coverage or “no coverage” were automatically covered for $250,000 in accordance with this provision (Exhibit B). A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application AFBCMR Docket Number 01-02344 in Executive Session on 24 July 2002, under the provisions of AFI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01908

    Original file (BC-2002-01908.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Effective 1 April 2001, Public Law 106-419, automatically increased the level of SGLI coverage to $250,000 for all military members, until the members could elect reduced coverage or no coverage, regardless of any prior election. The AFPC/DPW evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states, in part, that Kirtland AFB leadership did not advise that if you had...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00860

    Original file (BC-2003-00860.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: SGLI premiums for the $250,000 coverage have been taken out since August 2000 until March 2003, while his records reflect $100,000 coverage since August 2000. It is their opinion that the applicant’s Air Force base leadership took adequate steps to inform all members of the increase in coverage and that the applicant had adequate time during the month of April 01 to make a new election and avoid the...