AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01540
In support of his application, applicant has provided a personal statement that is at Exhibit A. The applicant received an honorable discharge on 8 May 2000 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Personality Disorder). Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01548a
She received five (5) Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) in the grade of lieutenant colonel, in which the overall evaluations were “Meets Standards” and one (1) Referral OPR, closing 17 Feb 98, with the overall evaluation of “Does Not Meet Standards.” The applicant was relieved from active duty in the grade of lieutenant colonel on 30 Jun 98, under the provisions of AFI 36-3203 (Voluntary Retirement), and retired on 1 Jul 98. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01558
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01558 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), and the AFCM, Second Oak Leaf Cluster (2OLC). The Air Force has...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01576
His Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) be upgraded to a Airman’s Medal (AmnM) for action performed on 13 November 1982. b. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 1 October 1984, he was awarded an Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) for Heroism for his actions on 13 November 1982. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01582
To provide the applicant an exception would be unfair to service members who also were not eligible to retire under TERA. In this respect, the majority notes that the Air Force had a critical shortage of physicians when the applicant was appointed into the service and based upon this continuing need for his services, age waivers were approved until he reached 67 years of age. Therefore, in consideration of the totality of the circumstances of this case, and his nearly 17 years of faithful...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01608
The AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The applicant’s counsel states that AF/JAG concedes that the U.S. Court of Appeals has twice concluded that the EEO language used by the Secretary at the CY96C board required different treatment of officers based on their race and gender and must now be evaluated under a strict scrutiny analysis. The court has found the same language...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01610
c. Correction of his duty title on his Officer Selection Brief (OSB) to match the Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 31 May 99. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPE advises that the applicant’s officer selection record was complete for the CY00B promotion selection board. The instructions specifically state, “Officers will not be considered by a Special Selection Board if, in exercising reasonable diligence, the officer should have discovered the error or omission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01619
On 19 December 1999, administrative discharge actions were terminated and she was retained in the Air Force Reserve. The applicant’s service history record indicates that for R/R year 1 February 1999 to 31 January 2000 (contested period), she earned 17 Active Duty points 22 Inactive Duty points, 0 Extension Course Institute (ECI) points and 15 membership points for 54 total retirement points and a satisfactory year of Federal service. Therefore, in the absence of evidence indicating she...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01623
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01623 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded an additional Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) to the Distinguished Unit Emblem. They have verified the applicant’s entitlement to the Distinguished Unit Citation with 1 Oak Leaf Cluster, while assigned to the ---th Bomb Squadron. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01646
AFBCMR BC-2003-01646 INDEX NUMBER: 112.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01661
However, should the Board approve the relief sought, the record should be corrected to reflect a pay date of 17 Mar 87. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the following legal opinion is provided. Exhibit F. Letter, HQ USAF/JAG, dated 28 Feb 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01702A
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 19 December 2002, the Board considered applicant’s request that he receive MOP of $300.00 for each of his two enlistments. Mr. Bennett voted to correct the records and has submitted a minority report which is attached at Exhibit H. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 15 Jul 03, w/atchs. Since the evidence of record establishes that he served on...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01704
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01704 (Case 2) INDEX CODE: 131.00, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY01B Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board (P0501B), with the corrected assignment history on his Officer Selection...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01707
His medical records include two physical examinations, one completed on 31 October 1946 at the time of his discharge from the U.S. Army, and another completed 22 August 1952 during his active duty period in the U.S. Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this case for a second time and determined that action and disposition in this case are proper and equitable reflecting compliance...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01710
The Secretary certainly would not be authorized to include a provision in the contract that provided for recoupment in cases where an officer was involuntarily discharged for medical reasons when the statute otherwise provides that such discharge must be on the basis of a voluntary failure to complete active duty or because of misconduct. Finally, counsel discusses HQ USAF/JAG’s position that paragraph 6(b) of the HPSP contract controls regardless of the reason for disqualification, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01711
The applicant was discharged on 12 Apr 98, he served 7 years, 1 month, and 1 day on active duty. The authorities involved all believed that a BCD was an appropriate consequence that accurately characterized his military service and his crimes. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01714
They have no record the member made an election at either time. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The spouse of the former member states in October of 1991, the former member signed for the package explaining retirement benefits that he was to review and elect the option of coverage to be provided. She also read in the letter of 1 November 2002, that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01740
On 27 September 2001, the Board recommended that the reason for his discharge be changed from asthma to anxiety disorder based on the opinion of the BCMR Medical Consultant that a diagnosis of asthma was not substantiated and that the applicant’s disabling symptoms were due to an anxiety disorder manifesting as panic attacks. The BCMR Medical Consultant concludes that the prior AFBCMR decision to change the applicant’s records to show disability discharge for anxiety disorder without...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01744
AFBCMR 02-01744 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01750
After a thorough review of the available records, we found no evidence that the RE Code assigned at the time of the applicant’s separation was contrary to the governing regulation or unjust. At the time a member is separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE Code predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their separation. The evidence of record supports the stated reasons for applicant’s separation and the corresponding RE code assigned in his...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01757
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01757 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, be changed from “Erroneous Enlistment.” ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01770
---, which is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that the applicant provided no facts warranting an upgrade of his discharge. Exhibit B. LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-01770 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01781
According to HQ AFPC/DPPPO’s advisory opinion at Exhibit F, the applicant was considered for the grade of colonel by the following promotion boards: 20 Jun 60 Permanent Colonel (Regular) 12 Jun 61 Regular Colonel 27 Nov 61 HQ USAF Temporary Colonel 11 Jun 62 Regular Colonel 3 Dec 62 Temporary Colonel Nomination 10 Jun 63 Regular Colonel 8 Jul 63 Temporary Colonel Nomination, FY64 14 Sep 64 Central Temporary Colonel, FY65 24 May 65 Regular Colonel 13 Sep 65 Central Temporary Colonel, FY66 20...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01786
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01786 INDEX CODES: 108.00, 131.09 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he was medically retired in the grade of technical sergeant, the highest grade he held in the Air Force, with a disability rating of 75 percent. Under the Air Force system (Title...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01790
By memorandum dated 5 Apr 03, the applicant amended the above request to request that the Board approve replacement of his original PRFs with revised PRFs, signed by his senior rater, for the Calendar Year (CY) 1999B (99B) and CY00A Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards. Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the evaluations prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force found at Exhibits C, D, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01793A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01793 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he provides four letters of character reference in support of the following original requests: a. A majority of the Board finds that the commander acted completely...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01793B
_________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied. Ms. Graham voted to grant the applicant’s requests and has attached a minority report at Exhibit R. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit M. Addendum Record of Proceedings, dated 28 Jan 03, w/atchs. A majority found that applicant had not provided sufficient...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01795
The ERAB considered and denied a request to remove the contested EPR from the applicant’s records. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 4 Jun 03 for review and comment within 30 days. ___________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01796
She requested Reserve placement and was scheduled for a physical evaluation. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01798
Subsequent to his name change and gender reassignment on 31 Jul 98, the applicant submitted an application to the Board requesting a DD Form 214 correction to reflect the name as J---- Marie W----. DPSAMP states that Air Force personnel records correctly reflects the applicant's name and gender during the period of service and on the date of retirement. In this case the DD Form 214 is correct as of the date of retirement.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01813
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01813 INDEX CODE: A68.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable or general. A complete copy of the AFLSA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01815
On 19 July 2001, SAFPC determined that the applicant did serve satisfactorily in a higher grade within the meaning of Section 8964 and directed applicant’s advancement to the grade of master sergeant (MSgt) on the retired list effective the date of completion of all required service. The commander considered the evidence, including everything the applicant presented, and determined that the applicant committed the offenses and a reduction in grade was the appropriate punishment. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01816
There is no clear evidence to support the applicant’s contention that his diagnoses at that time were in error and that he should have been discharged based on his headaches or a depression diagnosis through the disability evaluation system. The decision to process a member through the military DES is determined by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) when he or she is determined disqualified for continued military service. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 19 Aug 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01818
He received one AF Form 475 dated 14 June 2001 to document his elimination from Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training (SUPT) due to flying deficiencies. The environment presented at Vance AFB, was in direct violation of the Department of Defense, the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the United States Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, the 71st Flying Training Wing, and the 25th Flying Training Squadron regulations policies, and guidelines concerning sexual harassment,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01818A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01818 INDEX CODE: 135.00, 102.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests that he regain his Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) slot at NAS Corpus Christi, and be given 10 warm-up flights in the T-34 and then placed in the T-44...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01820
DPAMW recommended denial and stated in order to meet a Medical Corps selection board, an individual must be a member of that competitive category--Medical Corps. AFPC/DPPPO complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and stated that his complaint goes into detail on the current privileging and job responsibilities of podiatrists and how...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01821
Other reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. Applicant was not given pay credit for the period 20 May 1984 to 11 May 1988, time spent in USUHS per Title 10 USC Section 2126 which states “service not creditable while a member of the program shall not be counted (1) in determining eligibility for retirement other than by reason of a physical disability incurred while on active duty as a member...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01823
DPFP’s evaluation, along with attached correspondence from the -- ANG Chief of Staff and an e-mail trail between DPFP and the ANG Advisor to the Commander for 19th Air Force, is at Exhibit B. HQ AETC/DOF recommends the applicant not be reinstated into SUPT. DOF’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant notes that the National Guard Bureau (NGB) has...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01833
On 7 Jun 02, it was requested that the member provide a completed DD Form 2656-1, SBP Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01836
JA recommends that no changes be made to the applicant’s record. AFOATS/JA’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. Regarding the “bounced” checks, the applicant states that he did not reveal them in his application to Officer Training School (OTS) because he did not know that that part of his financial history was an issue.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01849
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01849 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Record (OSR) be corrected to include the award of the Air Force Meritorious Service Medal, 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (MSM 1OLC), his duty title entry corrected and he receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01855
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states in 1950 he put in for his discharge thinking that his leave time accrued would be included in his time served. He is unable to work and was hoping the discharge date can be changed to include his leave time (Exhibit E). Based on the limited documentation in...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01858
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-01858 INDEX CODE 131.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Academic Education section in the Officer Selection Brief (OSB) for the Calendar Year 2001A (CY01A) central colonel selection board be updated to reflect completion of the Advanced Education in General Dentistry II (AEGDII)...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01874
Although the applicant was eliminated from SUPT, the Air Force and the --- ANG supported him in his efforts to complete navigator training. At the time of the applicant’s enrollment in SUPT, the ANG had not implemented the IFT program for Air National Guardsmen; however, the ANG determined the applicant possessed the necessary qualifications to enter SUPT training anyway. Even though the applicant was eliminated from SUPT, the ANG supported him to become a Navigator.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01886
The Medical Consultant also noted that the applicant completed a DD Form 2697, Report of Medical Assessment, as part of his separation physical examination in Jun 00, reporting problems with low back pain, shin splints and bilateral elbow tendonitis. Under the Air Force system (Title 10, USC), Physical Evaluation Boards (PEBs) must determine if an individual’s medical condition renders them unfit for duty. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01894
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01894 INDEX CODE: 131.09 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be provided the retirement grade he should have received. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. There was evidence in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01915
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial stating, in part, that the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) is awarded for service in Vietnam, Thailand, Cambodia and Laos during the period of 4 Jul 65 – 28 Mar 73. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01921
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01921 INDEX CODE: 108.01 COUNSEL: Ms. Marcia B. Delaree HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be changed to reflect that he was discharged for medical reasons. He was treated for various medical conditions throughout his military career; however, his...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01942
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01942 INDEX NUMBER: 111.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In his original DD Form 149, dated 11 Jun 02, the applicant requested that the Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered on him for the period 1 Jan 00 through 31 Dec 00 be replaced with a revised report. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01943
She addressed the training issue and her missing training records in her rebuttal to the referral report. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO recommends that the applicant not be considered for promotion to major by special selection board for the CY01A Central Major Selection Board. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Additional Air...