AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02793
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPF recommends denial of his request to change his OPB to reflect select in the Developmental Opportunity block and noted the applicant is not a "Select." The complete DPAPF evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial, stating, in part, after careful review of his application, no evidence was found to show the applicant's nonselections for promotion to the grade of Lt Col by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02795
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating the applicant was considered and denied for award of the DSSM and he was awarded the appropriate level award for his service and retirement from a joint assignment in accordance with...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02801
If she had been on the correct profile when she completed the June 2011 FA, she would have passed the FA with a 75.5 score and would not have received the referral EPR. DPSID states that based on the AFPC/DPSIM advisory to grant the relief sought to exempt the cardio component of the FA dated 8 June 2011, they contend that the fitness assessment failure is an inappropriate comment on the contested referral EPR, and as a result, the referral EPR should be removed from her record. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02806
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02806 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to his dependents. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 17 September 2012, a copy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02808
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an MSM upon his retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02813
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the cardio, sit-up, and push-up components of her FA dated 2 Apr 2012 reflect exempt in the AFFMS. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02820
AFBCMR BC-2012-02820 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02824
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. _____________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial of the applicants request to remove the Article 15 and states, in part, nonjudicial punishment is authorized by Article 15, UCMJ (10 U.S.C. Consequently, he appealed the Article 15 on the basis that he was not provided...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02830
The applicants contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-02830 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 July 2012, w/atchs. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02831
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: According to a letter he received from the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) dated 23 January 2012, he should have been discharged in the grade of Staff Sergeant instead of Senior Airman. On 23 August 2012, AFPC/DPSOE notified the applicant by letter (Exhibit D) that although SAFPC determined that he served satisfactorily in the grade of Staff Sergeant, it was for disability purposes...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02840
AFBCMR BC-2012-02840 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02844
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02844 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official records be corrected to reflect that he was not twice passed over for promotion to the rank of captain, but was promoted to captain. The OPR included bullets which read When required, could accelerate his pace to the level necessary to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02848
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02848 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record reflects his service in the Republic of Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Based on the available records, the applicant had continuous service from 11 Sept 69 until his discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02850
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02850 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _______________________________________________ ____________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation, Reentry (RE) code, and separation program designator (SPD) code be changed so that he can be eligible to re-enlist. While the applicants narrative reason for separation and SPD code should be corrected, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02852
The applicant provided an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 13 March 2012, stating no push-ups. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant requests the entire FA be removed, the AF Form 469 only exempted him from the push-up portion of the FA and not the other components.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02853
AFBCMR BC-2012-02853 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02858
As of Aug 03, the service member had no eligible child for SBP. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit C. Letter,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02860
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02860 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Air Force Overseas Ribbon - Short Tour (AFOR-ST). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02873
By letter dated 12 July 2012, AFPC/DPSIM requested the applicant provide additional supporting documentation to substantiate his claim; specifically, copies of his signed fitness questionnaire and a signed memorandum from the NCOIC or OIC of the bioenvironmental engineering office stating the weather conditions for the day in question (Exhibit B). The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02880
A complete copy of the NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPFD recommends denial, indicating, there is no evidence of an error or injustice with respect to the applicants disability processing. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFD evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 17 Feb 13 for review and comment within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02885
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02885 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal and the Air Force Longevity Service Award. Service from 1 June 1963 to an indefinite date shall be considered under the criteria established for the Air Force Good Conduct...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02886
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02886 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His entry level separation be changed to a medical discharge. Had the Air Force known of this condition at the time of his enlistment, he would not have been allowed entry into the military. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02889
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02889 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. In order to separate a service member in lieu of court-martial, the request must be based on the fact that charges have been preferred. Based on her time in service, she would have had the right to an administrative separation board hearing.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02890
On 10 Jan 86, the case was found to be legally sufficient and, on 17 Jan 86, the discharge authority directed the applicant be furnihed a general discharge. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02895
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His duty title history reflects that during the period of 2007- 2010 he was the squadron commander; however, during this period, he was recommended for Operations Officer, which had a negative progression from a commander position. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02897
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02897 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His military personnel records be changed to reflect his correct social security number (SSN). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIRP evaluation is at Exhibit C. __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02898
She transferred to the Air Force Reserve effective 29 May 2012; the date her appointment was approved by the Secretary of Defense (SecDef). The General Counsel determined the appointment date is the date the SecDef approved the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02900
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C, D, and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PP recommends denial of the applicants request for promotion to Master Sergeant, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. ANGI 36-2502, Promotion of Airman, states Prior to promotion to any...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02903
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02903 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. Other relevant facts pertaining to this application, extractedfrom the applicant's military records, are at Exhibit B. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02905
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, stating, in part, that based onthe information reported in the TEB and counseling notes inRight Now Technology (RNT) by the Total Force Service Center(TFSC) personnel, the applicant was provided all instructions/requirements needed prior to the TEB applicationapproval; specifically, the requirement to sign a Statement ofUnderstanding (SOU) agreeing to the obligated service incurredfor participating in the TEB option under the Post-9/11 GI...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02908
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02908 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 2T211, Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) be removed from his military personnel records. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K states in accordance with Air Force Instruction 36- 2101,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02912
On 10 Sep 08, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) referred her to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB), based on the diagnoses of metabolic syndrome and fibromyalgia. The applicant did not agree with their findings and recommendation On 9 Dec 10, a Formal Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) reviewed her case and also recommended her removal from the TDRL and discharge with severance pay with a 20 percent disability rating. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02916
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02916 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4E (Grade is airman first class or below and airman completed 31 or more months (55 months for a 6- year enlistees), if a first-term airman; or, grade is airman first class or below and the airman is a second-term or...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02919
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was informed at the time of his discharge that he was to wait at least six months and request an upgrade to an Honorable discharge. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to grant the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02923
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02923 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Re-entry (RE) code of 4E, Ineligible Due to Insufficient Grade Grade is A1C or Below, on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Discharge or Release from Active Duty be changed or upgraded to 3B, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration Decision...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02928
DPSIM states the applicant is contending that he failed the FA due to an elevated heart rate; however, a review of his fitness assessment shows that he scored above the required minimum in the cardio component. He further states that his PCM provided a memorandum that clearly states the medication has an effect on the heart rate. In this respect, we note that although the evidence of record indicates that the side effect of the medication impacted the applicants score on the cardio...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02932
The Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program (AFHPSP) contract the applicant signed specifically states that if a member is separated prior to completing a period of active duty that was agreed upon to serve, the member may be subject to recoupment of educational funds. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02934
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02934 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntary separation with Honorable discharge) be changed to a code that will allow him to enlist in the United States Marine Corps. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02937
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02937 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Global War on Terrorism - Expeditionary Medal (GWOT-E) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He deployed after 9/11 in support of Operation...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02941
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. Based upon the published policy guidance, the fact that the applicant met all eligibility requirements and that the delay in release of the FY12 ACP policy was through no fault of his, they recommend approval of the applicant's requests. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02942
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02942 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Vietnam and Thailand. He spent over 20 total months in Thailand, Vietnam, and Okinawa in 1967, 1968, and 1969. The remaining relevant facts...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02948
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02948 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge from the Air National Guard be upgraded tohonorable. At that time, he was also invited to provide additional evidence pertaining to his activities sinceleaving the service (Exhibit D). THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did notdemonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02950
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02950 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report ofTransfer or Discharge, should be updated to reflect his Vietnamservice. Additionally, a thorough review of his MPR, medical records, and training records, failed to substantiate his claim of foreign service in Vietnam, as therewere no travel orders,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02951
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, noting that the TEB program wasnot in effect at the time of the applicants retirement on30 Jun 08. She has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice on the part of the Air Force. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Aug 12.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02956
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02956 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, becorrected to show that he was awarded the Republic of VietnamCampaign Medal (RVCM). The applicant's complete response is at Exhibit D. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The following members of the Board considered Docket NumberBC-2012-02956 in Executive Session...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02958
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02958 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His character of service be changed from uncharacterized to honorable. Additionally, the Medical Consultant recommends the applicants narrative reason for discharge be changed to reflect the correct narrative reason Adjustment Disorder. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02966
After reviewing the evidence of record, the AFDRBconcluded that no change in his discharge was warranted. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to recommendgranting the relief sought on that basis. 2 The following members of the Board considered Docket NumberBC-2012-02966 in Executive Session on 14 Feb 13, under theprovisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02967
He has matured over the years. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who entered active duty on 16 March 1981. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 17 December 2012 Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2012-02967 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02975
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 03 Feb 09. Airmen are given entry-level separation with uncharacterized service when separation is initiated within the first 180 days of continuous active service. While the applicants military personnel records indicate that he was erroneously issued an RE code of 4C, his correct RE code should be...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02979
If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was not personally notified about the need to transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, the Board may approve the member's request. The complete DPSIT evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He asks the Board...