Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02806
Original file (BC-2012-02806.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02806 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of 
Educational Benefits (TEB) to his dependents. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was not informed of the requirement to transfer his benefits 
while still on active duty. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from 
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter 
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFRC/A1K recommends denial. A1K states the applicant may be 
eligible to use the Post-9/11 GI Bill himself based on the number 
of qualifying Title 10 days he has completed; however, he is not 
eligible to transfer educational benefits to his dependents since 
he retired on 24 June 2007, prior to the 1 August 2009 effective 
date of the transfer program. 

 

The A1K complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 17 September 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days 
(Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The 
applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with 
the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error 
or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02806 in Executive Session on 11 February 2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02806 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 May 2012, w/atchs. 


 Exhibit B. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 10 September 2012. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 September 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04745

    Original file (BC-2012-04745.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Due to the limited time between implementation of the Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB on 1 August 2009 and his retirement on 1 September 2009, he was not afforded sufficient information or opportunity to apply for and receive a Certificate of Eligibility and request transfer of benefits to his dependents. The complete AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response, the applicant states...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05625

    Original file (BC-2012-05625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 10 December 2004, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. Title 38 of the United States Code mandates a service member to complete six years of satisfactory service and the member must also agree to serve four additional years in the Selected Reserve when transferring benefits to their dependents. After a thorough review of the evidence of record...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05036

    Original file (BC-2012-05036.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00104

    Original file (BC-2013-00104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00104 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependents effective 11 February 2010. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He elected to transfer his educational...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01858

    Original file (BC-2012-01858.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01858 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) application be approved. He was verbally informed that because he was retired, he was no longer eligible to transfer his education benefits. All Department of Defense (DoD) requests and transactions...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02542

    Original file (BC-2012-02542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-02542 in Executive Session on 8 Jan 13,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03998

    Original file (BC-2010-03998.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was not provided the necessary information regarding the transfer of benefits to a dependent prior to his retirement. While we note the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicates were taken to inform eligible personnel of this new benefit, it appears that through no fault of the applicant,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01502

    Original file (BC-2012-01502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election can transfer their unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and in light of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01556

    Original file (BC-2013-01556.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Air Force Reserves. At the time of retirement, the applicant had completed 9 satisfactory years of service. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility that since the applicant did not meet the requirements of the Post-9/11 GI Bill program at the time of his retirement, he is not eligible to transfer...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00917

    Original file (BC-2010-00917.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after August 1, 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service....